reported uses of it. Most examples are on highly activated
disubstituted enones or require long reaction times.5
We report herein a practical and general approach for
regiospecific addition of sodium bisulfite to activated olefins.
The sulfonic acid adducts’ utility is demonstrated by the rapid
assembly of the recently reported IZD class of pTyr
mimetics.
Table 2. Synthesis of Sulfonic Acids 6 via
Microwave-Assisted Additions of Sodium Bisulfite to Activated
Olefins 5
Ethyl cinnamate 5a was used as a model system to
optimize sodium bisulfite addition conditions that would
allow for exploration of a variety of substituted olefin
derivatives (Table 1). A solvent mixture of ethanol and water
Table 1. Optimization of Sodium Bisulfite Addition
Conditions
entry
heatingb
oil bath
oil bath
oil bath
microwave 165
microwave 180
T (ïC) pressure (bar) time (min) convc (%)
1
2
3
4
5
125
125
165
1
1
d
30
180
30
5
32
56
12
17
30
10
>95
>95
a Conditions: 1.0 equiv of ethyl cinnamate, 2.0 equiv of sodium bisulfite,
1:1 ) H2O/EtOH, 1.0 M concentration. b Heating at 165 and 180 °C was
done in 1.0 mL total solvent volume (1.0 mmol scale) in 10 mL sealed µW
tubes. c Determined by LCMS with monitoring UV at 220 nM. d Pressure
was not determined.
was selected to promote solubility of both the organic
reactant and the bisulfite salt. While reaction with sodium
bisulfite did proceed slowly at vigorous reflux (Table 1,
entries 1 and 2), clean conversion to product 6a was obtained
in a matter of minutes in the microwave at 165 and 180 °C
(Table 1, entries 4 and 5). While microwave tubes are
designed to withstand pressure up to 21 bar, we recommend
maintaining pressure under 15 bar.
Utilizing these optimized microwave-assisted conditions
a variety of â-aryl enoates were investigated as substrates
for sodium bisulfite additions (Table 2).
The expected products (6a-e) were initially isolated by
preparative HPLC/LCMS chromatography. However, on a
gram scale it was more convenient to isolate sulfonic acid
adducts via crystallization, which afforded comparable yields.
To explore the scope of the reaction, less reactive and more
hindered substrates were investigated. While in some cases
these examples required longer reaction times, cinnamide
5f, ethyl 3,3-dimethylacrylate 5g, and cyclic enoate 5h (Table
2) afforded moderate to high yields of adducts 6f-h utilizing
the optimized reaction conditions. In the case of enoate 5g,
the higher temperature and pressure in the microwave were
critical as the reaction did not proceed even after 24 h at
reflux in an oil bath.
Additional compounds with a methylene spacer between
the aryl ring and the IZD, substituted 4-but-2-enoic acid ethyl
esters, were examined as substrates. The first derivative 5i
afforded a high yield (87%) of product 6i. In attempts to
prepare further alkyl enoate derivatives, substituted styrene
5j was prepared with conjugation to the aryl ring instead of
(4) For early representative examples,, see: (a) Beilstein, F. K.; Wiegand,
H. Chem. Ber. 1885, 18, 482. (b) Dodge, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1930,
52, 1724. (c) Thurston, J. T. U.S. Patent 2,402,512, 1944.
(5) For more recent representative examples, see: (a) Kellogg, R. M.;
Nieuwenhuijzen, J. W.; Pouwer, K.; Vries, T. R.; Broxterman, Q. B.;
Grimbergen, R. F. P.; Kaptein, B.; La Crois, R. M.; de Wever, E.; Zwaagstra,
K.; van der Laan, A. C. Synthesis 2003, 10, 1626. (b) Baczko, K.; Chasseray,
X.; Larpent, C. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2001, 2, 2179. (c) Hejchman,
E.; Haugwitz, R. D.; Cushman, M. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 3407. (d)
Pfoertner, K. H. HelV. Chim. Acta 1980, 63, 664.
5068
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 22, 2005