2002 Organometallics, Vol. 29, No. 9, 2010
Table 1. CCA of Acetophenones by Ir(ttp)Cl(CO)
Li et al.
Scheme 1. Transformation from Ir(ttp)OH to Ir(ttp)H
entry
FG
F 2a
H 2b
Me 2c
OMe 2d
time/d
product (yield/%)
1
2
3
4
13
20
12
15
Ir(ttp)CO(4-F-Ph) 3a (74)
Ir(ttp)COPh 3b (71)a
Ir(ttp)CO(4-Me-Ph) 3c (78)
Ir(ttp)CO(4-OMe-Ph) 3d (79)
4a was hydrolyzed by water (100 equiv) in benzene-d6 at
200 °C for 3 days (eq 6).13 Likely, water attacks at the iridium
center to give Ir(ttp)OH14 and acetophenone. Ir(ttp)OH can
undergo reduction at high temperature to yield IrII(ttp);15
IrII(ttp) further rapidly disproportionates into IrIII(ttp)-
aAromatic CHA products of Ir(ttp)(p-COMe-Ph) 4b and Ir(ttp)(m-COMe-Ph)
4c were also isolated in 4% and 8% yield, respectively. For the typical experimental
details see ref 20.
þ
(OH2)n (n = 1 or 2) and IrI(ttp)-,16 which upon proton-
ation with H2O gives Ir(ttp)H (Scheme 1). We propose that
Ir(ttp)CH2COPh 4a, as the kinetic product, likely converts to
Ir(ttp)OH and Ir(ttp)H in the presence of water, or Ir(ttp)Cl
in the presence of HCl at high temperature. As Ir(ttp)H did
not react with benzene to give the aromatic CHA product of
Ir(ttp)Ph, more likely Ir(ttp)OH cleaves the aromatic C-H
bond to form 4b-c.14d,17
without any 3b formed (eq 3). The R-CHA reaction is a facile,
kinetic process.
The possible intermediacy of 4a for CCA was further
examined by independent reactions between 4a and 2b at
200 °C. After 15 days, 4b and 4c were produced in 21% and
42% yield, respectively, together with 3b in 21% yield (eq 4).
After 26 days, 3b was formed in 75% yield, while 4b,c still
remained in 8% and 16% yield, respectively (eq 4). Further-
more, when the more accessible Ir(ttp)Ph11 1b was used as an
analogue of Ir(ttp)(p- and m-COMe-Ph) (4b and 4c) to react
with acetophenone, the CCA product 3b was isolated in trace
amount (<5%) only with the recovery of 1b in 88% yield
after heating for 28 days at 200 °C (eq 5). These results
suggest that 4b,c are less likely the direct intermediates for
CCA, as they reacted very slowly. Furthermore, a direct
σ-bond metathesis of metal-C and C-C bonds is sterically
difficult and unprecedented.12 We therefore considered other
more plausible mechanistic fates for 4a-c.
Similar to 4a, 4b,c can be hydrolyzed to convert to Ir(ttp)OH
and Ir(ttp)H or Ir(ttp)Cl in the presence of water or HCl.
Indeed, with the addition of 100 equiv of water in the reaction
of Ir(ttp)Ph and acetophenone, a higher yield of Ir(ttp)COPh
3b was obtained in 12% yield (eq 7 vs eq 5). The slower rate of
hydrolysis of 1b compared with 4a is likely due to the stronger
and more hindered metal aryl bond than the metal alkyl
bond.18
As both Ir(ttp)OH and Ir(ttp)H are proposed inter-
mediates for CCA, the more accessible and observed
Ir(ttp)H was reacted with acetophenone independently.
(14) For Rh(oep)OH, see: (a) Del Rossi, K. J.; Wayland, B. B. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 7941-7944. For Rh(tspp)OH (tspp = tetra-p-
sulfonatophenylporphyrinato), see: (b) Fu, X.; Wayland, B. B. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2623–2631. (c) Fu, X.; Li, S.; Wayland, B. B.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8947-8954. For hydrolysis of Rh-
(tspp)CH2COR with water to form Rh(tspp)OH, see: (d) Zhang, J.; Li, S.;
Fu, X.; Wayland, B. B. Dalton Trans. 2009, 3661–3663. (e) Zhang, J.;
Wayland, B. B.; Yun, L.; Li, S.; Fu, X. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 477-483.
For Ir(acac)2OH, see: (f) Tenn, W. J., III; Young, K. J. H.; Oxgaard, J.;
Nielsen, R. J.; Goddard, W. A., III; Periana, R. A. Organometallics 2006, 25,
5173–5175. (g) Attempted synthesis of Ir(ttp)OH from the reaction of
Ir(ttp)Cl(CO) with KOH remains unsuccessful.
(15) Hydroxide ion is an effective one-electron reducing agent; see:
Sawyer, D. T.; Roberts, J. L., Jr. Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21, 469–476.
(16) Analogous disproportionation reactions of Rh(por)II, see: (a) In
excess MeOH: Li, S.; Cui, W.; Wayland, B. B. Chem. Commun. 2007,
4024-4025. (b) By strong ligand: Wayland, B. B.; Balkus, K. J., Jr.; Farnos,
M. D. Organometallics 1989, 8, 950-955. (c) Wayland, B. B.; Sherry, A. E.;
Bunn, A. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 7675–7684.
Indeed, Ir(ttp)H7 1c was observed in 20% yield together
with acetophenone 2b in 20% yield when Ir(ttp)CH2COPh
(11) Ogoshi, H.; Setsune, J.-i.; Omura, T.; Yoshida, Z.-i. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 6461–6466.
(12) Direct σ-bond metathesis of the C-C bond is unprecedented,
ꢀ
and it was proposed but later amended. See: Soulivong, D.; Coperet, C.;
Thivolle-Cazat, J.; Basset, J.-M.; Maunders, B. M.; Pardy, R. B. A.;
Sunley, G. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5366–5369.
(13) (a) The lower yield obtained is likely due to the competitive
decomposition of Ir(ttp)H. (b) 4a was consumed completely, and no
Ir(ttp)COPh and Ir(ttp)(p- and m-COMe-Ph) were observed. (c) The
alternate nucleophilic attack on the R-carbon of 4a would have produced
PhCOCH2OH, which was not detected. This mode of reaction has been
reported in strongly alkaline media for analogous rhodium porphyrin
complexes in intramolecular cases. See: Sanford, M. S.; Groves, J. T.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 588–590.
(17) For reported examples of the aromatic C-H bond cleavages by
M
IIIOH, see: (a) Kloek, S. M.; Heinekey, D. M.; Goldberg, K. I. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4736–4738. (b) Hanson, S. K.; Heinekey, D. M.;
Goldberg, K. I. Organometallics 2008, 27, 1454–1463. (c) Bercaw, J. E.;
Hazari, N.; Labinger, J. A. Organometallics 2009, 28, 5489–5492.
ꢀ
(18) Clot, E.; Megret, C.; Eisenstein, O.; Perutz, R. N. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 8350–8357.