A. Andreani et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 40 (2005) 1331–1334
1333
Table 2
IR and 1H-NMR of compounds 8–15 (th = thiazole, ar = aromatic)
Compound
IR: mmax (cm−1
)
1H-NMR:a d (ppm) in DMSO-d6
8
1670, 1320, 1230, 1140, 1100
1705, 1595, 1370, 1230, 1120
1670, 1320, 1230, 1135, 1095
1700, 1580, 1230, 1150, 825
1685, 1120, 750, 685, 655
1690, 1120, 950, 820, 655
1695, 1315 1225, 1110, 680
1720, 1220, 1130, 835, 730
1675, 1225, 1130, 750, 685
1710, 1205, 1120, 825, 690
1685, 1235, 1148, 717, 666
1725, 1230, 1122, 835, 738
1715, 1250, 1153, 764, 682
1696, 1127, 835, 748, 661
1700, 1291, 1148, 840, 687
1700, 1245, 825, 738, 666
1.36 (8H, m, 4CH2), 1.71 (4H, qui, 2CH2, J = 6.5), 2.48 (6H, s, 2CH3), 4.27 (4H, t, 2COOCH2, J = 6.5)
7.43 (2H, d, th, J = 4.4), 8.06 (2H, d, th, J = 4.4)
8a
1.37 (8H, m, 4CH2), 1.77 (4H, qui, 2CH2, J = 6.3), 2.70 (6H, s, 2CH3), 3.95 (6H, s, 2CH3I), 4.40 (4H,
t, 2COOCH2, J = 6.3) 7.89 (2H, d, th, J = 4.1), 8.42 (2H, d, th, J = 4.1)
9
1.32 (12H, m, 6CH2), 1.69 (4H, qui, 2CH2, J = 6.6), 2.49 (6H, s, 2CH3), 4.25 (4H, t, 2COOCH2,
J = 6.6), 7.43 (2H, d, th, J = 4.4), 8.05 (2H, d, th, J = 4.4)
9a
1.33 (12H, m, 6CH2), 1.76 (4H, qui, 2CH2, J = 6.7), 2.71 (6H, s, 2CH3), 3.95 (6H, s, 2CH3I), 4.40 (4H,
t, 2COOCH2, J = 6.7) 7.89 (2H, d, th, J = 4.2), 8.43 (2H, d, th, J = 4.2)
10
1.17 (4H, m, 2CH2), 1.55 (4H, qui, 2CH2, J = 6.2), 4.19 (4H, t, 2COOCH2, J = 6.2), 7.39 (6H, m, ar),
7.52 (2H, d, th, J = 4.4), 7.77 (4H, m, ar), 8.20 (2H, d, th, J = 4.4)
10a
11
0.78 (4H, s, 2CH2), 1.30 (4H, qui, 2CH2, J = 6), 3.75 (6H, s, 2CH3I), 4.14 (4H, t, 2COOCH2, J = 6),
7.64 (10H, s, ar), 8.00 (2H, d, th, J = 4.2), 8.59 (2H, d, th, J = 4.2)
1.16 (8H, s, 4CH2), 1.57 (4H, qui, 2CH2, J = 6.3), 4.20 (4H, t, 2COOCH2, J = 6.3), 7.39 (6H, m, ar),
7.52 (2H, d, th, J = 4.4), 7.77 (4H, m, ar), 8.20 (2H, d, th, J = 4.4)
11a
12
0.88 (4H, s, 2CH2), 1.00 (4H, s, 2CH2), 1.38 (4H, qui, 2CH2, J = 5.3), 3.74 (6H, s, 2CH3I), 4.16 (4H, t,
2COOCH2, J = 5.3), 7.63 (10H, s, ar), 7.98 (2H, d, th, J = 3.5), 8.58 (2H, d, th, J = 3.5)
1.18 (12H, s, 6CH2), 1.57 (4H, qui, 2CH2, J = 6.3), 4.21 (4H, t, 2COOCH2, J = 6.3), 7.40 (6H, m, ar),
7.53 (2H, d, th, J = 4.4), 7.79 (4H, m, ar), 8.20 (2H, d, th, J = 4.4)
12a
13
0.93 (4H, m, 2CH2), 1.11 (8H, s, 4CH2), 1.40 (4H, qui, 2CH2, J = 6.4), 3.74 (6H, s, 2CH3I), 4.17 (4H,
t, 2COOCH2, J = 6.4), 7.64 (10H, s, ar), 7.99 (2H, d, th, J = 4.1), 8.58 (2H, d, th, J = 4.1)
2.40 (6H, s, 2CH3), 3.83 (4H, t, 2CH2, J = 4.6), 4.41 (4H, t, 2CH2, J = 4.6), 7.33 (2H, d, th, J = 4.4),
7.97 (2H, d, th, J = 4.4)
13a
14
2.69 (6H, s, 2CH3), 3.94 (6H, s, 2CH3I), 4.54 (8H, m, 4CH2), 7.84 (2H, d, th, J = 4.2), 8.35 (2H, d, th,
J = 4.2)
2.44 (6H, s, 2CH3), 3.63 (4H, s, 2CH2), 3.76 (4H, t, 2CH2, J = 4.6), 4.34 (4H, t, 2CH2, J = 4.6), 7.39
(2H, d, th, J = 4.4), 8.00 (2H, d, th, J = 4.4)
14a
15
2.70 (6H, s, 2CH3), 3.64 (4H, s, 2CH2), 3.80 (4H, t, 2CH2, J = 4.7), 3.94 (6H, s, 2CH3I), 4.50 (4H, t,
2CH2, J = 4.7), 7.88 (2H, d, th, J = 4), 8.39 (2H, d, th, J = 4)
2.48 (6H, s, 2CH3), 3.55 (8H, s, 4CH2), 3.73 (4H, m, 2CH2), 4.35 (4H, m, 2CH2), 7.41 (2H, d, th,
J = 4.4), 8.03 (2H, d, th, J = 4.4)
15a
2.70 (6H, s, 2CH3), 3.57 (8H, m, 4CH2), 3.79 (4H, m, 2CH2), 3.94 (6H, s, 2CH3I), 4.49 (4H, m, 2CH2),
7.88 (2H, d, th, J = 4.2), 8.40 (2H, d, th, J = 4.2)
Table 3
The effect of the spacers was comparable for all the quat-
ernized compounds with the C type (13a–15a) giving good
Inhibition of acetylcholinestearase activity a
Compound
IC50 (µM)
70 15
inhibition (IC50 = 1.8–2.8 µM) and the most active com-
pounds being the B-type (8a, 10a, IC50 = 0.8, 1.4 µM, respec-
tively).Among this limited number of compounds, the nature
of the spacer influenced biological activity more than the
length of the spacer itself or the nature of the substituent at
the 6 position.
8a
10
3
3.5 0.7
40
13
6
4
45 15
30
0.8 0.1
20
6
4. Experimental section
10
4
10a
13a
14a
15a
1.4 0.5
1.8 0.4
1.8 0.4
2.8 0.4
0.20 0.03 b
4.1. Chemistry
The melting points are uncorrected. Elemental analyses
(C, H, N) were within 0.4% of the theoretical values. Bak-
erflex plates (silica gel IB2-F) were used for TLC: a mixture
of chloroform/methanol in various proportions was used as
the eluent and exposure to a UV lamp or iodine vapor was
used as the visualization method. The IR spectra were
recorded in Nujol on a Nicolet Avatar 320E.S.P.; mmax is
expressed in cm−1 (see Table 2). The 1H-NMR spectra were
recorded in (CD3)2SO on a Varian Gemini (300 MHz); the
chemical shift (referenced to solvent signal) is expressed in d
Tacrine
a Mean S.D. of at least three independent measures.
b Used as the reference compound [15].
activity. The improvement in activity shown by the quater-
nized compounds were most likely dependant on an interac-
tion of the positive charged imidazo[2,1-b]thiazoles with an
active site of the enzyme. The prior activity seen for 5a and
6a (IC50 = 13, 30 µM, respectively) suggests that the increase
in contractile force at low doses [10] was due more to ACh
release than AChE inhibition.