A. Wirwis et al. / Molecular Catalysis 445 (2018) 61–72
71
tube under an N2 atmosphere. Next, 1-alken-3-ol (1.34 mmol) and
the solvent, DMF or DMF/H2O = 1.5/1, were added with a pipette.
The Schlenk tube was closed with a rubber plug, and the reaction
mixture was stirred at 90 ◦C for 6 h. After the given reaction time,
the Schlenk tube was cooled down, and the organic products were
separated by extraction with diethyl ether (three times with 4, 3,
and 3 cm3). The products were GC–MS analyzed (Hewlett Packard
8454A) with mesitylene (75 l) as the internal standard.
down, and the organic products were separated by extraction with
diethyl ether (three times with 4, 3, and 3 cm3). The products were
GC–MS analyzed (Hewlett Packard 8454A) with mesitylene (75
l) as the internal standard.
4. Conclusions
In these studies, two highly efficient methods leading to aryl
ketones were developed. Allylic alcohols were used as substrates,
and phosphorus-free palladium compounds were employed as cat-
alyst precursors. In the second method, unsaturated ketones were
first arylated according to the Heck protocol, and the resulting aryl
ketone was hydrogenated to the final product. Under the stud-
ied conditions, the efficiency of this strategy was satisfactory for
iodobenzene but not for 4-iodophenol.
3.3. Arylation of 3-buten-2-one followed by hydrogenation
The reactions were carried out in a 50 cm3 Schlenk tube with
magnetic stirring. The reagents, iodobenzene (1.34 mmol), NaHCO3
(1.25 mmol; 0.1050 g), PdCl2(cod) (0.5 mol%; 6.7 × 10−6 mol;
0.001913 g), and IL (6.7 × 10−6 mol) or [CA]2[PdCl4] [0.5 mol%;
6.7 × 10−6 mol], were introduced to the Schlenk tube under an N2
atmosphere. Next, 3-buten-2-on (1.34 mmol, 0.109 cm3) and DMF
(2.5 cm3) were added with a pipette. The Schlenk tube was closed
During the reactions, Pd(II) was reduced to Pd(0) nanoparti-
cles, which participated in the catalytic process, most probably
as a catalytically active form of palladium. The surface of Pd(0)
nanoparticles was modified by ionic liquids which formed a layer
preventing agglomeration to the less active palladium forms. How-
ever, ionic liquids had only moderate influence on the reaction
course, although, in the reaction of 1- penten-3-ol, the yield of
ketone increased by 20% in the presence of IL. It could be therefore
concluded that ionic liquids did not restrict access of substrates
to the catalytically active centers. On the other hand, a negative
effect of ionic liquids in the Heck coupling of 3-buten-2-one with
4-iodophenol can indicate on the competition between substrates
and ionic liquid for a place in the palladium environment. Further-
more, IL influenced the morphology of the palladium nanoparticles
that formed big crystals of well-defined shape. The catalytic activity
of anionic palladates, [CA]2[PdCl4], in the Heck coupling of unsatu-
rated alcohols and ketones was rather low. This could be explained
by the slow transformation of these complexes to Pd(0) nanoparti-
cles which was however significantly facilitated by the introduction
of an H2 atmosphere. Consequently the reactivity increased, but
the selectivity of the reaction changed, and di-aryl ketones were
formed.
The comparison of the two protocols studied indicated the
advantages of the one using allylic alcohols as substrates. In com-
parison to the procedure employing unsaturated ketones, the
reactions of allylic alcohols could be performed in one step under
mild conditions in a relatively short time.
The possibility to perform efficiently the synthesis of aryl
ketones from allylic alcohols in the studied system could be ratio-
nalized from the mechanistic point of view. Because of the low
ability of palladium to isomerize the allylic alcohol substrate, iso-
merization did not compete with Heck arylation. Advantageously,
Heck coupling proceeded mainly in -position and the resulting -
alkyl palladium intermediate could undergo isomerization to the
final ketone. At this stage, the studied catalysts demonstrated high
ability to activate C H bonds in the alkyl group coordinated to
palladium.
with a rubber plug, and the reaction mixture was stirred at 100 ◦
C
for 24 h. After that time, the Schlenk tube was filled with H2 from
a balloon (1 atm), and heating continued for 6 h. Next, the Schlenk
tube was cooled down, and the organic products were separated
by extraction with diethyl ether (three times with 4, 3, and 3 cm3).
The products were GC–MS analyzed (Hewlett Packard 8454A) with
mesitylene (75 l) as the internal standard.
3.4. Arylation of 3-buten-2-ol in H2 atmosphere
The reactions were carried out according to the procedure
described above, applying an H2 atmosphere (1 atm) instead of an
N2 one.
3.5. Preparation of samples for TEM
a)[CAI]2[PdCl4] + DMF + H2(30min)
The complex [CAI]2[PdCl4] (0.5 mol%; 6.7 × 10−6 mol; 0.0056 g)
and DMF (2.5 cm3) were introduced into a 50 cm3 Schlenk tube.
The Schlenk tube was closed with a rubber plug, frozen in liquid
nitrogen, and air was evacuated using a pump. The evacuation was
repeated three times, and next the Schlenk tube was connected to
a balloon with H2 (1 atm). The solution was heated at 100 ◦C for
30 min, cooled down, and analyzed by TEM.
b)[CAI]2[PdCl4] + DMF + NaHCO3 + H2(30min)
The sample was prepared according to the procedure described
above with the addition of NaHCO3 (1.25 mmol; 0.1050 g).
c)[CAI]2[PdCl4] + DMF + NaHCO3
+ 3-buten-2-on + PhI + H2(30 min)
The sample was prepared according to the procedure described
above with the addition of NaHCO3 (1.25 mmol; 0.1050 g), 3-buten-
2-on (1.34 mmol; 0.109 cm3), and PhI (1.34 mmol; 0.15 cm3).
Acknowledgements
3.6. Hg(0) test
The reactions were carried out in a 50 cm3 Schlenk tube
with magnetic stirring. The reagents, iodobenzene (1.34 mmol,
0.150 cm3), NaHCO3 (1.25 mmol; 0.1050 g), [CAI]2[PdCl4] (0.5
mol%; 6.7 × 10−6 mol; 0.0056 g), 3-buten-2-on (1.34 mmol,
0.109 cm3), PhI (1.34 mmol, 0.150 cm3), and DMF (2.5 cm3), were
added in an N2 atmosphere. The Schlenk tube was closed with a
rubber plug, and the reaction mixture was stirred at 100 ◦C for
1 h. After that time, Hg(0) was added (3.35 × 10−3 mmol; 50 l],
and heating continued for 1 h. Next, the Schlenk tube was cooled
Financial support of National Science Centre (NCN, Poland) with
grant 2014/15/B/ST5/02101 is gratefully acknowledged.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found,