cessful. The derivatives of hydrazone, MBTH and MBTHS,
were reacted with the methylated product (4) to obtain sABT
(50%) and sABTS (63%), respectively. The isolation of
product (4) was not necessary,15 and thus, the next step in
the reaction scheme was performed in the same reaction
flask. The conversion from 3 and 4 was ∼95% as indicated
by TLC. Both sABT and sABTS are white powders. It should
be noted that the sodium salt of sABTS is difficult to dissolve
in most organic solvents. Therefore, this product was
prepared for chromatographic isolation and polymerization
by washing with 1 M HCl. After chromatographic isolation,
the purified product was neutralized with an organic base
(i.e., tetrabutylammonium hydroxide) to obtain a product that
exhibits good solubility in both organic solvents and water
for subsequent polymerization.
The tetrabutylammonium salt of sABTS was polymerized
in ethanol for 1 day at 65 °C in the absence of oxygen using
2,2′-azo-bis(isobutyronitrile) (AIBN) (50:1) as the radical
initiator. Cooling the reaction to room temperature subse-
quently stopped polymerization. The resulting viscous prod-
uct was dialyzed (MWCO 3,500) against deionized water
for 1 day. Polymerization of sABTS was indicated by peak
broadening between 5 and 8 ppm in the 1H NMR spectrum
of the dialyzed product and the absence of sharp peaks
corresponding to the vinyl protons in sABTS (see Supporting
Information). The aromatic protons of the styryl substituent
are represented by a broad peak at 7 ppm, which is similar
to what is observed in the 1H NMR spectrum of polystyrene
sulfonate (see Supporting information) and other derivatives
of polystyrene.16 After dialysis, a solution containing poly-
ABTS (∼28 µmol of sABTS monomer, as calculated from
the absorption spectrum using the extinction coefficient of
sABTS) was dried on the surface of an electrode (d ) 4
mm) for cyclic voltammetry and bioelectrocatalysis experi-
ments. A second solution containing polyABTS (∼56 µmol
of sABTS monomer) was dried on the surface of an ITO
electrode (1 cm2) for electrochromic experiments.
Figure 1. CVs of commercially available ABTS (closed circles),
sABT (open circles), sABTS (solid line), and film of polyABTS
(open triangles). The concentration of all three monomers was 2.5
mM, and the electrolyte was 0.1 M tetrabutylammonium tetrafluo-
roborate in DMSO. Also shown is the CV of an electrode coated
with polyABTS immersed in an aqueous solution of 0.2 M KCl.
The scan rate was 10 mV s-1 for all CVs.
of a film of polyABTS prepared by drying a drop of a 25
µM solution of polyABTS on a glassy carbon electrode. E1/2
of the polyABTS film is 500 mV in 0.2 M KCl solution,
which is 120 mV negative to that of its monomer in DMSO.
The peak to peak separation is 168 mV, indicating poor self-
exchange kinetics in a pure film of polyABTS.18
The method of Nicholson was used to determine the rate
constant (kh) for heterogeneous electron transfer between a
glassy-carbon electrode and the polymerizable monomers.19
For sABT, kh ) 1.47 × 10-3 cm s-1, and for sABTS kh )
2.18 × 10-3 cm s-1. For comparison, kh ) 2.02 × 10-3 cm
s-1 for ABTS in 0.1 M tetrabutylammonium tetrafluoroborate
DMSO solution or 4.54 × 10-3 cm s-1 in sodium acetate
buffer (pH 4).
The compound N,N′-bis(3-methyl-3H-benzothiazol-2-
ylidene)-hydrazine (mABT) has been used as the electro-
active component in an electrochromic device.1 Both mABT
and sABTS have similar chemical structures; however,
sABTS possesses an N-styryl group to render the monomer
polymerizable and a sulfonate group to make it and its
corresponding polymer water soluble. Shown in Figure 2 are
the UV-vis spectra of an ITO electrode coated with a film
of polyABTS (∼56 µmol sABTS) while immersed in an
aqueous solution of 0.2 M KCl. Spectra correspond to the
film before (solid line) and after (dotted line) poising the
electrode at 600 mV for 10 s. Application of an oxidizing
potential converts polyABTS (transparent in the visible
region of the absorption spectrum) to polyABTS•+, which
is blue-green in color.
Values for E1/2 of sABT, sABTS and ABTS were obtained
from the cyclic voltammograms (CVs) shown in Figure 1.
All potentials are reported vs SCE. For sABT, E1/2 is 613
mV when dissolved in a DMSO solution containing in 0.1
M tetrabutylammonium tetrafluoroborate. Under identical
conditions, E1/2 of sABTS is 620 mV. The peak to peak
separation of 76 mV for sABT and 78 mV for sABTS
indicates reversible electrochemical reactions.17 The diffusion
coefficients of sABT and sABTS are 1.21 × 10-6 and 8.1
× 10-7 cm2 s-1, respectively. For comparison, the value for
E1/2 of ABTS (commercially available) is 587 mV in DMSO
and 440 mV in sodium acetate buffer (pH 4).4 The diffusion
coefficient of ABTS in DMSO is 1.39 × 10-6 cm2 s-1, and
in sodium acetate buffer (pH 4) the value is 3.22 × 10-6
cm2 s-1. Also shown in Figure 1 is the cyclic voltammogram
Shown in the inset of Figure 2 are the UV-vis spectra of
20 µM solutions of sABT, sABTS, and ABTS in DMSO.
(14) Sutoris, V.; Gaplovsky, A.; Sekerka, V. Chem. Pap. 1986, 40, 103.
(15) Fahmy, H. T. Y.; Rostom, S. A. F.; Saudi, M. N.; Zjawiony, J. K.;
Robins, D. J. Arch. Pharm. 2003, 336, 216.
(16) (a) Yang, J. C.; Jablonsky, M. J.; Mays, J. W. Polymer 2002, 43,
5125. (b) Mathew, A.; Deb, P. C. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1998, 199, 2527.
(17) Bard, A. J.; Faulkner, L. R. Electrochemical Methods; Wiley: New
York, 1980.
(18) (a) Daum, P.; Lenhard, J. R.; Rolison, D.; Murray, R. W. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 4649. (b) Anson, F. C.; Saveant, J. M.; Shigehara,
K. J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 214.
(19) Nicholson, R. S. Anal. Chem. 1965, 37, 1351.
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 1, 2006
5