Organic Letters
Letter
a b
,
equiv), in MeCN/CHCl3 (9.2 mL/0.8 mL) at room
temperature (Table 1, entry 1). Attempts to replace a platinum
Scheme 2. Electrochemical Oxydichlorination of Alkynes
a
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions
b
entry
variation from standard conditions
none
Pt (+) | C (−) instead of Pt (+) | Pt (−)
C (+) | Pt (−) instead of Pt (+) | Pt (−)
NH4I instead of TBAI
KI instead of TBAI
TBAB instead of TBAI
without CHCl3
yield
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
89%
17%
50%
trace
trace
trace
c
n.d.
8
9
CHCl3 instead of CH3CN as the solvent
0.6 equiv TBAI instead of 0.8 equiv TBAI
1.0 equiv TBAI instead of 0.8 equiv TBAI
5 mA instead of 10 mA, 10 h
15 mA instead of 10 mA, 4 h
n-Bu4NBF4 instead of LiClO4
n-Bu4NPF6 instead of LiClO4
without current
trace
84%
62%
50%
72%
trace
trace
n.d.
10
11
12
13
14
15
a
Standard conditions: constant current = 10 mA, 1a (0.3 mmol),
TBAI (0.8 equiv), LiClO4 (1.0 equiv), H2O (2.0 equiv), MeCN/
CHCl3 (10.0 mL, 9.2/0.8) in an undivided cell with two platinum
b
electrodes, rt, 6 h. Yields were determined by HPLC analysis with
c
naphthalene as the internal standard. n.d. = not detected.
electrode with a graphite electrode resulted in a significant
decrease of yields (Table 1, entries 2 and 3). Other additives,
such as NH4I, KI, and tetrabutylammonium bromide (TBAB),
were also examined, and only a trace amount of 2a was
detected on HPLC (Table 1, entries 4−6). Not surprisingly,
no desired product 2a was observed in the absence of CHCl3
(Table 1, entry 7). A reaction run in CHCl3 without MeCN
gave only a trace amount of desired product (Table 1, entry 8).
Lowering or raising the amount of TBAI or the current
reduced the oxydichorination reaction efficiency (Table 1,
entries 9−12). The reaction was dramatically affected upon
replacing the electrolyte with either n-Bu4NBF4 or n-Bu4NPF6
(Table 1, entries 13 and 14). Finally, a control reaction without
electricity was conducted, and no desired product was
observed, confirming the importance of electrocatalysis in
facilitating this transformation (Table 1, entry 15).
Having identified the optimized conditions, we then
explored the substrate scope for this oxydichlorination with a
variety of readily available alkynes. As shown in Scheme 2, this
oxydichlorination tolerates various functional groups and
substitution patterns on the aryl rings. Alkynes bearing
electron-donating groups (Me, t-Bu, MeO) on the phenyl
ring participated in the reaction smoothly to give products 2a−
2f in good to high yields. In addition to para-substituted
phenylacetylenes, meta- and ortho-substituted phenylacetylenes
(2b and 2f) could also work well in this transformation. The
reaction of phenylacetylenes with electron-withdrawing groups
(F, Cl, Br, CHO, CO2Me, CN, NO2) on the benzene ring
proceeded smoothly to deliver the corresponding α,α-
dichloroketones 2g−2n in moderate to good yields. In
addition, the fragile TMS and TBS groups (2o and 2p) were
also compatible in this oxydichlorination. Moreover, internal
a
Standard conditions: constant current = 10 mA, 1a (0.3 mmol),
TBAI (0.8 equiv), LiClO4 (1.0 equiv), H2O (2.0 equiv), and MeCN/
CHCl3 (10.0 mL, 9.2/0.8) in an undivided cell with two platinum
b
electrodes, rt, 6 h. Isolated yield.
alkynes were also good candidates for the oxydichlorination
and rendered the expected α,α-dichloroketones 2q and 2r in
moderate yields. Notably, 3-phenyl-2-propargyn-1-ol 1r with
an easily oxidized activated alcohol moiety was compatible
with our reaction conditions. Remarkably, 1,3-diethynylben-
zene was selectively oxidized, affording product 2s in 42%
yield. Finally, a complex estrone derivative was also reactive to
furnish the desired product 2t, albeit in a lower yield.
Encouraged by these results, we then evaluated the
electrochemical oxydibromination of alkynes. Gratefully,
phenylacetylene 1a reacted successfully with CH2Br2 under
our reaction conditions, forming the desired product 3a in 74%
yield (Scheme 3). Generally, alkynes with electron-rich arenes
(3b−3e) exhibited higher reactivity than electron-deficient
substrates (3f−3m). It is worth mentioning that halogens (F,
Cl, Br), ester, nitro, cyano, and even aldehyde, survived under
our reaction conditions, providing the possibility for further
structural elaboration.
Next, we turned our attention to the examination of different
halogen sources with 1a as the substrate under electrochemical
conditions (Scheme 4). For the chlorinating reagents, both
chloroform (CHCl3) and 1,2-dichloroethane (ClCH2CH2Cl)
provided 2a in high yields. Dichloromethane (CH2Cl2) and
tetrachloromethane (CCl4) were also suitable chlorinating
reagents for this transformation, leading to 2a in good yields.
On the contrary, only dibromomethane (CH2Br2) reacted very
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX