kinase, and Phosphomevalonate kinase) superfamily of small-
molecule kinases. MVK and MDD share the same fold,
catalyze phosphorylation of chemically similar substrates
(MDD decarboxylation involves phosphorylation of meva-
lonate diphosphate), and seem to have evolved from a
common ancestor.5c Kinases are a ubiquitous group of
enzymes central to many biochemical processes.6 The transfer
of the terminal phosphoryl group from one nucleotide to
another, or to a small molecule (by enzymes which we term
“small molecule kinases”), or to a protein substrate (by
protein kinase) is a fundamental process in many aspects of
metabolism, gene regulation, and signal transduction.6
lonate lactone is relatively expensive, which prevents large-
scale preparation of mevalonate 5-diphosphate. We devel-
oped a new synthetic method for the preparation of mevalonate
5-diphosphate as shown in Scheme 1, which facilitated our
Scheme 1. Organic Synthesis of Mevalonate Diphosphate
A variety of substrate analogues of MVK and MDD
targeting the mevalonate binding site have been studied,7 and
some have been found to be enzyme inhibitors. In addition,
MVK is subject to posttranscriptional regulation via competi-
tive inhibition at the ATP-binding site by prenyl phosphates
of varying length, including geranyl diphosphate (GPP),
farnesyl diphosphate (FPP), and geranylgeranyl diphosphate
(GGPP).8 Because of the potential importance of MVK and
MDD in the regulation of cholesterol biosynthesis, and their
similar structure and catalyzed reaction, we tried to develop
a common inhibitor effective for both enzymes. In the present
study, we report organic synthesis and biological character-
ization of a bifunctional molecule, which can inhibit both
MVK and MDD. This molecule may become a lead for
further development by the pharmaceutical industry for
treating cardiovascular disease and certain forms of cancer.
further study of MDD. 4-Hydroxy-2-butanone reacted with
toluenesulfonyl chloride in the presence of pyridine to give
4-tosyloxy-2-butanone (1), which was then reacted with
methyl 2-bromoacetate through a Reformatsky reaction
yielding methyl 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-5-tosyloxypentanoate
(2). Mevalonate 5-diphosphate (4) was obtained through
reaction of compound 2 with pyrophosphate followed by
hydrolysis with base.
Three bisubstrate analogues (compounds 38, 39, and 40)
were synthesized through three parallel syntheses as shown
in Scheme 2. Three corresponding analogues (compounds
The substrate of MDD, mevalonate 5-diphosphate, has
been obtained previously through hydrolysis of mevalonic
lactone followed by reaction with pyrophosphate.9 The
method required protection of the carboxylate group of
mevalonate through formation of methyl ester after hydroly-
sis of mevalonic lactone, and also needed deprotection of
the methyl group after reaction with pyrophosphate. Meva-
Scheme 2. Organic Synthesis of Bisubstrate Analogues
(4) (a) Iglesias, J.; Gonzalezpacanowska, D.; Marco, C.; Garciaperegrin,
E. Biochem. J. 1989, 260, 333. (b) Gonzalezpacanowska, D.; Marco, C.;
Garciamartinez, J.; Garciaperegrin, E. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1985, 833,
449. (c) Mitchell, E. D.; Avigan, J. Circulation 1979, 60, 31. (d) Tanaka,
R. D.; Schafer, B. L.; Lee, L. Y.; Freudenberger, J. S.; Mosley, S. T. J.
Biol. Chem. 1990, 265, 2391. (e) Jabalquinto, A. M.; Cardemil, E. Arch.
Biochem. Biophys. 1981, 210, 132. (f) Gonzalezpacanowska, D.; Marco,
C.; Garciamartinez, J.; Linares, A.; Garciaperegrin, E. Nutr. Rep. Int. 1985,
31, 121. (g) Gonzalez-Pacanowska, D.; Marco, C.; Garcia-Martinez, J.;
Garcia-Peregrin, E. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1986, 875, 605. (h) Tanaka, R.
D.; Lee, L. Y.; Schafer, B. L.; Kratunis, V. J.; Mohler, W. A.; Robinson,
G. W.; Mosley, S. T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1990, 87, 2872. (i)
Jabalquinto, A. M.; Cardemil, E. Lipids 1980, 15, 196.
(5) (a) Fu, Z. J.; Wang, M.; Potter, D.; Miziorko, H. M.; Kim, J. J. P. J.
Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 18134. (b) Yang, D.; Shipman, L. W.; Roessner,
C. A.; Scott, A. I.; Sacchettini, J. C. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 9462. (c)
Bonanno, J. B.; Edo, C.; Eswar, N.; Pieper, U.; Romanowski, M. J.; Ilyin,
V.; Gerchman, S. E.; Kycia, H.; Studier, F. W.; Sali, A.; Burley, S. K.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98, 12896.
(6) Matte, A.; Tari, L. W.; Delbaere, L. T. J. Structure 1998, 6, 413.
(7) (a) Nave, J. F.; d’Orchymont, H.; Ducep, J. B.; Piriou, F.; Jung, M.
J. Biochem. J. 1985, 227, 247. (b) Reardon, J. E.; Abeles, R. H. Biochemistry
1987, 26, 4717. (c) Wilde, J.; Eggerer, H. Eur. J. Biochem. 1994, 221,
463. (d) Wilde, J.; Eggerer, H. Liebigs Ann. Recl. 1997, 581. (e) Dhe-
Paganon, S.; Magrath, J.; Abeles, R. H. Biochemistry 1994, 33, 13355. (f)
Vlattas, I.; Dellureficio, J.; Ku, E.; Bohacek, R.; Zhang, X. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 1996, 6, 2091.
(8) (a) Hinson, D. D.; Chambliss, K. L.; Toth, M. J.; Tanaka, R. D.;
Gibson, K. M. J. Lipid Res. 1997, 38, 2216. (b) Dorsey, J. K.; Porter, J. W.
J. Biol. Chem. 1968, 243, 4667.
32, 33, and 34) without a geranyl group were also synthesized
as shown in Scheme 2 for comparative study. The mono-
protected diols (8, 9, and 10) were oxidized with PCC,
(9) Reardon, J. E.; Abeles, R. H. Biochemistry 1987, 26, 4717.
1014
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 6, 2006