tively, the secondary amine on proline can activate a carbonyl
donor via an enamine formation and facilitate the ensuing
Michael reaction.8 Whereas these two types of recently dis-
covered reactions proceed according to an iminium ion mech-
anism or intermediate enamine formation, observation of both
mechanisms in one reaction has not been reported. As part
of our ongoing studies in cycloadditions,9 and organocataly-
sis,10 we were inspired to investigate whether the all-carbon
[3 + 3] reaction might be accomplished by the combination
of these two aforementioned mechanistic pathways.
We initially explored the reaction of crotonaldehyde with
50 mol % of L-proline (1) in CH3CN at room temperature
for 4 h. To our delight, the reaction afforded the two
diasteromeric [3 + 3] adducts 2 and 3 in a ratio of 1.8:1,
along with some p-tolualdehyde (4), Scheme 1. These
by benzoation (PhCOCl, CH2Cl2, Et3N, cat. DMAP; 85%)
afforded (-)-6, which proved to be identical to the product
obtained from the reduction 3 to 7 followed by Mitsunobu
reaction with benzoic acid. Chlorite oxidation of 2 to 8
(NaClO2, t-BuOH, 2-methyl-2-butene, NaH2PO4, 25 °C;
84%), followed by esterification (EtOH, cat. TsOH, 25 °C)
afforded 9 in 80% yield.13 Alkylation of ester 9 with MeLi
(THF, 0 °C, 80%) provided 10, which was hydrogenated
(Pd-C, H2, EtOAc; 75%) to give (-)-isopulegol hydrate
(11). Using the same reaction sequence, 3 was transformed
to (-)-cubebaol (15) via compounds 12, 13, and 14. The
enantiomer of 15, (+)-cubebaol, has been used for the
synthesis of the HIV-1 protease inhibitive didemnaketals.14
These 8-hydroxy menthols, p-menthane-3,8-diols, have been
reported to have biological activities, e.g., plant growth
inhibition, allelopathic effect, and strong mosquito repellent
activity.15 The cyclohexenol subunit is also quite prevalent
in various natural isolates and therapeutic agents. In a further
demonstration of the application of this methodology, 5 was
acetylated (Ac2O, CH2Cl2, Et3N, cat. DMAP; 85%) to 16,
an important intermediate for the total synthesis of lycopo-
dium alkaloid magellanine.16 The reaction has been examined
under various conditions, and selected results are summarized
in Table 1.17 Reaction in MeOH and THF gave many
unstable and unidentifiable compounds, and the reaction rate
decreases in the following order: DMF > DMSO > CH3-
CN > CH2Cl2 > MeOH ∼ THF.
Scheme 1
In CH3CN, the reaction is insensitive to substrate concen-
trations varying from 0.2 to 1.5 M. The enantioselectivity
of the reaction did not change in the presence of more catalyst
(20 versus 50 mol % of L-proline); however, the reaction
rate was slightly higher at 50 mol %. Prolonged reaction
times in CH3CN (8 days) led to the formation of 4. Reactions
catalyzed by D-proline gave the opposite enantiomers of 2
and 3. Lowering the temperature decreased the rate and the
yield of 4 but increased the enantioselectivity of 2 and 3,
and the best results were obtained in DMF at -10 °C (80%
ee for 2 and 95% ee for 3). Below -20 °C, L-proline gave
no reaction after a few days. In the presence of pyrrolidine
or (S)-indoline-2-carboxylic acid hydrochloride (21), the
reaction gave a complicated mixture. However, a mixture
of pyrrolidine (18) and acetic acid (19) afforded 4 exclusively
(10% yield after 3 h, 78% yield after 48 h), without any
trace of 2 or 3. Reaction with 5-oxo-L-proline (20) at room
temperature gave no reaction after 48 h, most likely due to
the unfavorable formation of the amide iminium ion.
Reaction with (4S)-4-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)-L-proline
(22) gave lower enantioselectivity.
adducts may be produced through a stepwise cascade reaction
and equilibrium process as shown in Scheme 2. It is likely
that the proline-catalyzed Michael reaction of crotonaldehyde
proceeds via transition state (E)-T11 and affords the (S)-
Michael adduct,12 which subsequently adds to the aldehyde
(enamine aldol reaction) to yield the cyclohexenes product.
To our knowledge, this is the first example of carbo [3 +
3]-cycloaddition of R,â-unsaturated aldehyde. The structure
of 2 was assigned unambiguously by its single-crystal X-ray
analysis. Reduction of 2 to 5 (LiAlH4, THF; 90%) followed
(6) For recent review, see: (a) Dalko, P. I.; Moisan, L.Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5138. (b) Notz, W.; Tanaka, F.; Barbas, C. F., III. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 580. (c) Seayad, J.; List, B. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005,
3, 719. (d) Berkessel, A.; Gro¨ger, H. Asymmetric Organocatalysis: From
Biomimetic Concepts to Applications in Asymmetric Synthesis; Wiley: New
York, 2005.
(7) Huang, Y.; Walji, A. M.; Larsen, C. H.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15051.
(8) (a) Yang, J. Woon; Fonseca, M. T. H.; List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 15036. (b) Yang, J. W.; Fonseca, M. T. H.; Vignola, N.; List,
B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 108.
(9) For an example of [6 + 2] cycloaddition, see: Hong, B.-C.; Shr,
Y.-J.; Wu, J.-L.; Gupta, A. K.; Lin, K. J. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2249.
(10) Chen, S.-H.; Hong, B.-C.; Su, C.-F.; Sarshar, S. Tetrahedron Lett.
2005, 46, 8899.
(11) For the directed electrostatic activation with (Z)-proline-derived
iminium, see: Kunz, R. K.; MacMillan D. W. C.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 3240.
(12) For (R)-selective Michael addition by L-proline derivative, see:
Marigo, M.; Schulte, T.; Franze´n, J.; Jørgensen, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 15710.
(13) For an alternative preparation of the methyl ester (mixture of
isomers) by a tandem Morita-Baylis-Hillman (MBH) and ring-closing-
metathesis (RCM) sequence, see: Krafft, M. E.; Song, E.-H.; Davoile, R.
J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 6359.
(14) Jia, Y. X.; Wu, B.; Li, X.; Ren, S. K.; Tu, Y. Q.; Chan, A. S. C.;
Kitching, W. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 847.
(15) Vaneˇk, T.; Novotny´, M.; Podlipna´, R.; Sˇaman, D.; Valterova´, I. J.
Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, 1239.
(16) ()-16 was used in the synthesis; see: Ishizaki, M.; Niimi, Y.;
Hoshino, O.; Hara, H.; Takahashi, T. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 4053.
(17) Hydroxyaldehydes 2 and 3 are volatile; hence the reported yields
are those of the corresponding alcohols (5, 7, and tolylmethanol) obtained
from in situ NaBH4 reduction.
2218
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 11, 2006