C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
resonance of the ATMS ligand is shifted far downfield, and the
13C NMR resonances for Cint and Cterm are divergently shifted
(∆δ: Hint +1.89, Cint +51.2, Cterm -15.4), as expected for
Cp′2Zr(OtBu)(alkene)+ complexes.4 Similar nondissociative alkene
face exchanges have been deduced to occur during chain end
epimerization in propylene polymerization with Zr catalysts through
studies with isotopically labeled propylenes.17a,b Alkene flipping
likely occurs via an alkene C-H σ-complex intermediate or
transition state.17d
These results show that nonchelated d0 Zr-aryl-alkyne and Zr-
aryl-alkene complexes can be generated using â-Si-substituted
alkynes and alkenes to strengthen substrate coordination and the
poorly nucleophilic -C6F5 group to inhibit insertion. Both tactics
are required: non-â-Si-substituted substrates such as propyne and
2-butyne do not coordinate to 7, and Cp2ZrMe+, Cp2ZrCH2Ph+,
and Cp2HfMe+ rapidly insert and oligomerize or polymerize ATMS
even at -78 °C.19 Neither 8 (at -38 °C) nor 10 (up to 22 °C)
undergoes insertion. The availability of stabilized d0 metal-carbyl-
alkene species should enable direct study of their structures and
dynamics to probe important issues in catalytic alkene polymeri-
zation.2,17 With further adjustment of the nucleophilicity of the Zr-R
group, it should be possible to access (C5R5)2Zr(R)(alkene)+ systems
in which both alkene coordination and insertion can be directly
observed and quantified.
1
unsymmetrical alkene coordination.3-5 The JCH values for the
alkene carbons (Cint 161, Cterm 150 Hz) are typical for an alkene
coordinated to a d0 metal,3-5 and are inconsistent with insertion
products in which those carbons would be sp3-hybridized.14 Addition
of THF to 10 (C6D5Cl, -38 °C) gives 9 (100%) and free ATMS.
The equilibrium constant for ATMS binding to 7 at -38 °C in
C6D5Cl, Keq ) [10][7]-1[H2CdCHCH2SiMe3]-1 ) 8.2(1.4) M-1
,
is 2.8 times larger than the Keq for ATMS binding to 1, which under
these conditions has a value of 2.9(7) M-1. VT NMR gives ∆H°
) -5.3(2) kcal/mol and ∆S° ) -18(1) eu for binding of ATMS
to 7.
When a solution of 7, 10, and free ATMS is warmed from -38
to +2 °C over 4 h, 10 and ATMS are gradually consumed and the
ATMS dimer 6,6-dimethyl-4-((trimethylsilyl)methyl)-6-silahept-1-
ene (11)15 is formed. 11 results from a Lewis acid-mediated
dimerization of ATMS15 due to 7 or trace Ph3C+ in solution.16 NMR
and GC/MS analysis of the organic products from a 7/ATMS
mixture maintained at 22 °C for 3 days shows the presence of
dimers and trimers of ATMS; while the exact structures of these
products have not been determined, none contain C6F5 groups. The
trimers likely form by a Lewis acid-mediated allylsilylation of 11.15
There is no evidence for ATMS insertion in 10.
Acknowledgment. We thank the NSF (CHE-0212210) for
support and the University of Chicago for a William Rainey Harper
Fellowship (E.J.S.).
1
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures, data
for new compounds, and selected NMR spectra (PDF). This material
VT NMR and H EXSY studies show that 10 undergoes two
dynamic processes. First, 10 undergoes reversible alkene decom-
plexation (eq 3). This process broadens all of the NMR signals of
10. The rate constant for ATMS decomplexation from 10 found
References
1
by H EXSY (kdissoc ) 5.0(8) s-1; C6D5Cl, -38 °C) is in close
(1) Horton, A. D. Chem. Commun. 1992, 185.
agreement with that determined from the line broadening of the
Htrans and p-F signals of 10 (kdissoc ) 5.5(2.5) s-1). This value is
not affected by the concentration of free ATMS, which indicates
that free ATMS does not directly displace bound ATMS from 10.
The activation parameters for ATMS decomplexation from 10 are
∆Hq ) 8.9(6) kcal/mol and ∆Sq ) -17(3) eu. The negative ∆Sq
value suggests that solvent or an o-F displaces the coordinated
alkene in an associative mechanism.4 This process is much slower
than ATMS decomplexation from 3 under the same conditions
(kdissoc ≈ 125 s-1; C6D5Cl, -38 °C).
(2) Resconi, L.; Cavallo, L.; Fait, A.; Piemontesi, F. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100,
1253.
(3) (a) Carpentier, J.-F.; Wu, Z.; Lee, C. W.; Stro¨mberg, S.; Christopher, J.
N.; Jordan, R. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7750. (b) Carpentier, J.-
F.; Maryin, V. P.; Luci, J.; Jordan, R. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
898.
(4) Stoebenau, E. J., III; Jordan, R. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3222.
(5) (a) Casey, C. P.; Carpenetti, D. W., II; Sakurai, H. Organometallics 2001,
20, 4262. (b) Casey, C. P.; Klein, J. F.; Fagan, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 4320. (c) Cano, J.; Go´mez-Sal, P.; Heinz, G.; Mart´ınez, G.;
Royo, P. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2003, 345, 15. (d) Brandow, C. G.; Mendiratta,
A.; Bercaw, J. E. Organometallics 2001, 20, 4253.
(6) Casey, C. P.; Tunge, J. A.; Lee, T.-Y.; Fagan, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 2641.
(7) Lambert, J. B. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 2677.
Complex 10 also undergoes nondissociative alkene face exchange
(“alkene flipping”), i.e., exchange of the Cp2Zr(C6F5)+ unit between
the two alkene enantiofaces without alkene dissociation (eq 4).17
(8) Chelated â-Si d0 metal-alkene complexes are known.5a,c,d
(9) (a) Foley, S. R.; Shen, H.; Qadeer, U. A.; Jordan, R. F. Organometallics
2004, 23, 600 and references therein. (b) Axe, F. U.; Marynick, D. S. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 3728.
(10) Bochmann, M.; Sarsfield, M. J. Organometallics 1998, 17, 5908.
(11) (a) Pindado, G. J.; Lancaster, S. J.; Thornton-Pett, M.; Bochmann, M. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6816. (b) Kraft, B. M.; Jones, W. D. J.
Organomet. Chem. 2002, 658, 132.
(12) For a d0 Ta-hydride-alkyne complex, see: Curtis, M. A.; Finn, M. G.;
Grimes, R. N. J. Organomet. Chem. 1998, 550, 469.
1
2
(13) For H2CdCHC6F5, JCH ) 161 (Cterm), 163 Hz (Cint). All JCH < 2 Hz.
1
(14) For C6F5Me, JCH ) 132 Hz (Me).
(15) Yeon, S. H.; Lee, B. W.; Yoo, B. R.; Suk, M.-Y.; Jung, I. N.
Organometallics 1995, 14, 2361.
This process broadens the Cp and Hallylic resonances of 10 to a
greater (and equal) extent compared to the other resonances of 10.
No exchange between Htrans and Hcis is observed by NMR line
(16) Schade, C.; Mayr, H. Makromol. Chem., Rapid Commun. 1988, 9, 477.
(17) (a) Sillars, D. R.; Landis, C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9894. (b)
Yoder, J. C.; Bercaw, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2548. (c) Peng,
T.-S.; Gladysz, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 4174. (d) Prosenc,
M.-H.; Brintzinger, H.-H. Organometallics 1997, 16, 3889.
(18) (a) Matchett, S. A.; Schmiege-Boyle, B. R.; Cooper, J.; Fratterelli, D.;
Olson, K.; Roberts, J.; Thommen, J.; Tigelaar, D.; Winkler, F. Organo-
metallics 2003, 22, 5047. (b) Chang, T. C. T.; Foxman, B. M.; Rosenblum,
M.; Stockman, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 7361.
1
broadening or H EXSY, thus ruling out mechanisms involving
rotation around the CdC bond (via a ZrCH2-C+HCH2SiMe3
carbocation intermediate).18 The rate constant for alkene flipping
determined by 1H EXSY (kflip ) 23(1) s-1; C6D5Cl, -38 °C, eq 4)
agrees reasonably well with that determined from the NMR line
broadening of the Hallylic signals of 10 (kflip ) 18(1) s-1), and shows
that alkene face exchange is ca. 4 times faster than alkene
decomplexation. Alkene flipping was not observed in 3 or other
(19) (a) Resconi, L.; Piemontesi, F.; Franciscono, G.; Abis, L.; Fiorani, T. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1025. (b) Habaue, S.; Baraki, H.; Okamoto,
Y. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1998, 199, 2211.
JA045794M
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 36, 2004 11171