further analysis of the data that led to the structural
assignment for natural 1,1 particularly the unusually large
2.7 Hz W-coupling proposed for C3H-C5H (on a type A),
it is painfully apparent that the ring architecture for natural
1 was improperly assigned.12
natural product previously assigned as 11 does not have the
C architecture, it should be noted that some related natural
products possess a C architecture and are presumably related
by biosynthesis to supposed natural 1.3
After careful reexamination of the reported data for natural
1, it became evident that architecture B was mistaken for
architecture A. The supposed 2.7 Hz W-coupling is actually
a vicinal coupling (C3-H-C6-H). In addition to our syn-
thesis of 1, additional evidence was found in the structural
assignment for compound 18, a related natural product iso-
lated from Tapirira obtusa.13 Although this analogue displays
a slightly longer side chain with an ω-5 site of unsaturation,
Three regioisomers (A-C, Table 1) accommodate the
functionality that comprises the six-membered ring and
Table 1
1
the H NMR data for 18 are strikingly similar to those
previously recorded for natural 1, particularly the (4.70 ppm)
shift of the C6 methine. Furthermore, the 13C NMR data
prove to be practically identical to those of homologue 18
in regards to the six-membered ring. We therefore propose
that the natural product reported to be structure 11 is in
fact its regioisomer 17. The confusion between type A and
B regioisomers has led others to improper structural assign-
ments as well. For example, the compound assigned as
structure 19 was reported in extracts of Periploca aphylla.4
We propose that the natural product assigned as 194 is
actually acremine A (20),14 a structure proVen by X-ray.
Furthermore, from a chemist’s perspective, the B and C
architectures can readily lead to a hydroquinone nucleus, such
as 2, by enolization, elimination, and tautomerization. How-
ever, architecture A requires a 1,2-alkyl shift, which is un-
precedented among biosynthetic transformations, to produce
the corresponding 1,4-hydroquinone. Given our synthesis of
1, the considerable stability of synthetic 1 to acidic and basic
conditions, as compared to natural 11 (17), and our reassign-
ments of natural 11 as its regioisomer 17 and of natural 194
as its regioisomer 20, no evidence for a biocatalyzed dione
rearrangement exists as of yet. We hope this letter helps to
clarify future cyclohexenone assignments and prevents future
confusion between these regiomeric cyclohexenones. At the
very least, we have described several new diastereoselective
transformations, introduced an innovative method for the
cleavage of the chiral directing group (Figure 4), and
increased the utility of chiral cyclohexadienones as building
bocks15 for future enantioselective syntheses.
Acknowledgment. A Research Grant from the National
Institutes of Health (GM-64831) is greatly appreciated.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental pro-
cedures and spectral data for compounds 3-16 and 1 are
available. This material is available free of charge via the
OL061000S
includes an enone, a secondary alcohol, a tertiary alcohol,
and a methylene functionality. In the case of regioisomer
C, however, the C5 methylene affords an AB-quartet in the
1H NMR,3 whereas the methylene in regioisomers A and B
would show some additional proton coupling. Although the
(13) de Jesus, S.; David, J. M.; David, J. P.; Chai, H.-B.; Pezzuto, J.
M.; Cordell, G. A. Phytochemistry 2001, 56, 781-784.
(14) Assanta, Z. G.; Dallavalle, S.; Malpezzi, L.; Nasini, G.; Burrano,
S.; Torta, L. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 7686-7692. At our behest, these authors
1
confirm that the compound previously assigned as 194 gives the same H
NMR spectra as 20 when analyzed in the same deuterated solvent.
(15) (a) Magdziak, D.; Meek, S.; Pettus, T. R. R. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104,
1383-1429. (b) Van De Water, R. W.; Hoarau, C.; Pettus, T. R. R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 5109-5113. (c) Pettus, L. H.; Van De Water,
R. W.; Pettus, T. R. R. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 905-908.
(12) Nicolaou, K. C.; Snyder, A. A. Angew Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44,
1012-1044.
2846
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 13, 2006