Pavlik et al.
benzonitrile sulfide (15) with ethyl cyanoformate followed by
saponification and decarboxylation of the ethyl ester;19 15 by
decarboxylation of 5-phenyl-1,3,4-oxathiazole-2-one prepared
by condensation of chlorocarbonylsulfenyl choride with ben-
zamide;40 5-phenyl-1,2,4-thiadiazole (6) and 3-methyl-5-phenyl-
1,2,4-thiadiazole (10) by condensing thiobenzamide with N,N-
dimethylformamide dimethylacetal or N,N-dimethylacetamide
dimethylacetal followed by cyclization of the resulting amidines
with hydroxylamine-O-sulfonic acid;41 diphenyl-1,2,4-thiadia-
zole (9) by reaction of thiobenzamide with nitrous acid;42
phenyl-1,3,5-triazine (7) and diphenyl-1,3,5-triazine (8) as a
mixture by condensing formamidine hydrochloride and ben-
zamidine hydrochloride followed by separation by steam
distillation;43 and 2,4-dimethyl-6-phenyl-1,3,5-triazine (12) and
2-methyl-4,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-triazine (13) by condensation of
N-[(dimethylamino)ethylidene]benzamide and either acetami-
dine or benzamidine in refluxing THF.44 Benzonitrile (5) and
triphenyl-1,3,5-triazine (14) were commercially available.
3-P h en yl-1,2,4-th ia d ia zole-2-15N (4-2-15N): Prepared from
benzamide-15N by the procedure developed to synthesize the
unlabeled compound;41 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.51-7.56 (m, 3H),
The yields of the cycloaddition product 21 were small,
however, ranging from ∼0.1% in the case of 4 to ∼0.5%
upon irradiation of 6. These low yields suggest that either
a photofragmentation pathway involving the interme-
diacy of benzonitrile sulfide (15) is a very minor reaction
pathway or photochemically generated benzonitrile sul-
fide (15) is less efficiently trapped than the thermally
generated species. Some evidence suggests that this may
be the case. Thus, although thermal decarboxyation of
5-phenyl-1,3,4-oxathiazol-2-one (22) in one molar excess
of dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate (DMAD) led to the
formation of dimethyl 3-phenylisothiazole-4,5-dicarboxy-
late (23) in 90% yield, the corresponding irradiation of
22 in the presence of the same trapping agent led only
to the formation of benzonitrile (5) and sulfur.39
) 1.5 Hz); 13C NMR
1
15
8.37-8.39 (m, 2H), 9.90 (d, 1H, J
,
H
N
(CDCl3) δ (DEPT-135) 128.7 (+), 129.2 (+), 131.0 (+), 132.8
(0), 173.1 (+) 174.5 (0) (d, J
) 3.0 Hz); 15N NMR (CDCl3)
13 15
C,
N
δ 258.4; MS m/z (%) 163 (80), 136 (100), 104 (23), 77 (26), 51,
(14).
Con clu sion
5-P h en yl-1,2,4-th ia d ia zole-4-15N (6-4-15N): Prepared by
converting benzamide-15N to thiobenzamide-15N,45 and pro-
ceeding according to the method developed to synthesize the
unlabeled compound;19 1H NMR (acetone-d6) δ 7.58-7.61 (m,
Photofragmentation leading to benzonitrile (5) forma-
tion is a major reaction pathway for phenyl-1,2,4-thia-
diazoles. 3-Phenyl-1,2,4-thiadiazole (4) reacts only by this
pathway and 15N-labeling experiments suggest that 5 is
formed either by direct fragmentation of the thiadiazole
ring or from the 1,5-diradical formed by photocleavage
of the S-N bond. In addition to fragmentation, 5-phenyl-
1,2,4-thiadiazole (6) also undergoes phototransposition
to 3-phenyl-1,2,4-thiadiazole (4) and photoconversion to
phenyl- and diphenyl-1,3,5-triazines (7 and 8). These
reactions are suggested to originate in electrocyclic ring
closure in 6 leading to 4-phenyl-1,3-diaza-5-thiabicyclo-
[2.1.0]pent-2-ene (BC-6). Sulfur migration and rearoma-
tization would account for the observed phototrans-
position while sulfur elimination would lead to phenyl-
diazacyclobutadiene 17. This species could undergo com-
plete fragmentation to benzonitrile (5) or [4+2] cycload-
dition leading to unstable tricyclic adducts, the suggested
precursors of the 1,3,5-triazine products 7 and 8. The
distribution of 15N in the phototransposition and triazines
products is consistent with this mechanistic interpreta-
tion.
3H), 8.06-8.08 (m, 2H), 8.84 (d, 1H, J
) 13.9 Hz); 13C
1
15
H,
N
NMR (acetone-d6) δ (Dept-135) 128.2 (+), 130.3 (+), 131.1 (0)
(d, J
(d, J
) 3.8 Hz), 188.6 (+); 15N NMR (acetone-d6) δ 302.2
) 13.9 Hz); MS m/z (%) 163 (88), 136 (100), 105 (92),
13 15
C,
N
1
15
H,
N
104 (24), 77 (59), 59 (64).
Ir r a d ia tion a n d An a lysis P r oced u r es. To monitor reac-
tions on an analytical scale, a solution of the reactant (4.0 mL,
2.0 × 10-2M) in the appropriate solvent was placed in a Pyrex
tube (7.0 mm inside diameter × 13.0 cm long), sealed with a
rubber septum, purged with argon for 10 min, and irradiated
in a Rayonet reactor equipped with 16 3000-Å lamps for the
appropriate length of time. Preparative-scale reactions were
carried out as indicated.
Reaction progress was monitored by removing aliquots at
specified times for GLC analysis. Retentions of all products
are given relative to the appropriate reactant. Quantitative
GLC analysis of reactant consumption and product formation
was accomplished by using calibration curves constructed for
the reactants and products by plotting detector responses
versus five standards of known concentrations. Correlation
coefficients ranged from 0.991 to 0.998. After irradiation, the
resulting solutions were concentrated to ∼0.1 mL and analyzed
by GC-MS. Retention times and fragmentation patterns were
compared with those of authentic samples of products.
All of the following irradiation are on an analytical-scale
unless otherwise indicated.
Exp er im en ta l Section
1
Gen er a l P r oced u r es. H, 13C, and 15N NMR spectra were
recorded at 400.1, 100.6, and 40.5 MHz, respectively. 15N
chemical shifts are reported in ppm downfield from NH3(l) and
were measured relative to aqueous Na15NO3, which was used
as an external standard and taken to absorb at 378.4 ppm
downfield from NH3(l). Mass spectra were recorded with an HP
5970B mass selective detector interfaced to an HP588 capillary
gas chromatograph. GLC was performed with use of a 15-m
× 3-µm Carbowax-20M bonded phase column employing the
following temperature program: 140 °C (4 min), 20 °C/min to
180 °C (14 min), 20 °C/min to 240 °C (30 min). Preparative
layer chromatography was carried out on 20-cm × 20-cm glass
plates coated with 2 mm Kieselgel 60 F254 (Merck).
3-P h en yl-1,2,4-th ia d ia zole (4). GLC analysis after 120
min of irradiation showed the consumption of 4 (81.6%) and
the formation of benzonitrile (5) (74.1%) with a relative
retention of 0.22. MS m/z (%) 103 (100), 77 (11), 76 (66), 75
(34), 74 (18), 73 (11), 653 (11), 52 (11), 51 (23).
(40) Muhlbauer, E.; Weiss, W. British Patent 1,079,348, 1967; Chem.
Abstr. 1968, 68, 69000W.
(41) Lin, Y.-I.; Lang, S. A., J r.; Petty, S. R. J . Org. Chem. 1980, 45,
3750-3753.
(42) Bahadir, M.; Siegfried, N.; Harun, P.; Korte, F. J . Agric. Food
Chem. 1979, 24, 815-818.
P r ep a r a tion of Sta r tin g Ma ter ia ls a n d P r od u cts. Com-
pounds previously described in the literature were prepared
as follows: 3-phenyl-1,2,4-thiadiazole (4) by cycloaddition of
(43) Schaefer, F.; Hechenbleikner, I.; Peters, G.; Wystrach, V. P. J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81, 1466-1470.
(44) Chen, C.; Dagnino, R.; McCarthy, J . J . Org. Chem. 1995, 60,
8428-8430.
(45) King, L. C.; Miller, F. M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1949, 71, 367-
368.
(39) Franz, J . E.; Black, L. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1970, 1381-1384.
4860 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 68, No. 12, 2003