Journal of the American Chemical Society
Article
alanine residues appeared to engage in strand formation, but
only two hydrophobic phenylalanine residues would drive
single-strand protofibrils to laterally associate (Figure 3d).
That is, the driving force for strand formation seemed to be
larger than that for strand-association; in this case, strand
formation appeared to be preferred, accounting for the high
restraint of this type of protofibril with respect to lateral
association.
structure of SL-3F protofibrils may not be as regular as a β-
sheet. Expectedly, the combination of CD spectroscopy
(Figure 3h), Fourier transform infrared spectrum (FT-IR),
urea addition assay, and varying temperature CD assay (Figure
S10) proved that triphenylalanine within SL-3F protofibrils
indeed adopts a PP II helix conformation, which has a
relatively random amide arrangement in comparison to β-
sheet.32
Based the single-strand protofibril model, the formation of a
double-strand fibril was simulated starting from two laterally
located single-strand protofibrils, as indicated from our AFM
observation (Figure 2c,d). It was found that a stable double-
strand fibril structure with striking left-handed tendency was
yielded after a 10 ns relaxation on the initial template of
simulation results showed that the average SASA of the middle
phenylalanine responsible for strand-association decreased
from 0.90 nm2 for a single-strand protofibril to 0.59 nm2 for
a double-strand fibril (Figure 3f), implying that the potential of
further lateral association of single-strand protofibril was
attenuated significantly by double-stranded association. In
addition, the all-atom simulation further suggested that only
double-strand fibrils came to emerge after certain relaxation
time even if more than two single-strand protofibrils
constituted the initial template (Figure S8). This result was
consistent with the aforementioned discussion, where the
driving force for strand-forming exceeded that for strand-
association and the single-strand protofibril preferentially
associated into double-strand species rather than underwent
infinite lateral association.
In short, the all-atom simulation explained the fibril
association very well since the obtained simulation structure
of the single-stranded protofibrils and double-stranded fibrils
were quite consistent with the experimental results. The
diameter of the single-strand protofibril of the simulation
model can be measured as 3.2 nm (Figure S9a), which is
consistent to the diameter measured by AFM as 3.2 nm
(Figure 2c). Similarly, the diameter of the double-stranded
fibril in simulation was measured as 6.4 nm (Figure S9b),
which is consistent with the diameter of 6.5 nm as observed by
AFM (Figure 1d). More importantly, starting from two
laterally associated single-strand protofibrils as observed in
experiments (Figure 2d), the left-handed twisting tendency of
the double-stranded fibril was very similar to the left-
handedness found under AFM (Figure 1b) and TEM (Figure
1c). Thus, we may conclude that the all-atom simulation
explained the observed fibril association very well, providing us
a whole picture on the molecular level from the starting
structure of SL-3F to single-strand protofibril, then to left-
handed double-strand fibrils. The consistency of simulation
and experiments gave us an opportunity to connect the
molecular structure to the various fibrous behaviors.
A relatively random amide arrangement arising from PP II
helix conformation was thought to be capable of removing
certain restrictions on the spatial motion of hydrophobic
phenylalanine residues,33 allowing the moderate exposure of
some hydrophobic residues on the surface of protofibrils as
confirmed by the determined SASA value of 0.90 nm2 of each
middle phenylalanine residue. Meanwhile, the carboxyl groups
of sialyllactose exposed on the surface of protofibrils tended to
be partially deprotonated in a neutral environment, giving rise
to electrostatic repulsion interactions between single-strand
protofibrils. Thus, hydrophobic and electrostatic repulsion
interactions appeared to be capable of antagonistically defining
the association behavior of single-strand protofibrils. It was
found that the double-stranding process tended to cause an
increase in the negative charge on the fibril surface as
confirmed by zeta-potential measurement (Figure S11a) and
also give rise to a 30% decrease in the exposed area of
hydrophobic residue on the fibril surface (Figure 3f). As the
electrostatic repulsion force emerged as a dominant interaction
for fibril association, these double-strand fibrils tended to
remain highly stable rather than continue to laterally associate.
We also experimentally investigated the interfibril hydrophobic
interactions. The outcome showed that the process of two
single-stranded protofibril associating into a double-stranded
fibril is often accompanied by appreciable changes in
involvement of hydrophobic interactions in the fibril
association process.
As an intermediate species of particular interest, the ribbon-
like structure involved in the association process of SL-3F
(Figure S12a) could be rationalized on the basis of the
compromise of electrostatic repulsion to hydrophobic
interaction among SL-3F single-strand protofibrils. To further
verify this point, 1 μL of NaOH solution (0.5 M) was added
into the 1 mL solution of the ribbon-like structure to
strengthen the electrostatic repulsion force among single-
stranded protofibrils. After only 0.5 h, the ribbon-like structure
already became relatively discrete, and then these discrete
single-strand protofibrils further associated into ultralong
double-strand fibrils within 8 h (Figure S12). The speed of
fibril association in basic conditions appeared to be dozens of
times faster than that in a neutral environment (Figure S13),
verifying the strong contribution from electrostatic repulsion.
Taken together, it appeared that this type of glycopeptide
model synergistically encoded the fibril association behavior
through two key parameters. One parameter referred to the
competition between the strand-forming tendency and strand-
association tendency, which was encoded by the peptide
moiety; another parameter is the competitive set of
interactions including electrostatic repulsion and hydrophobic
interaction that resided together on the surface of protofibrils,
which appeared to be encoded by the saccharide moiety
because the saccharide moiety not only contributed to the
electrostatic repulsion but also indirectly mediated the
exposure of hydrophobic residues on the surface of protofibrils
On the basis of the aforementioned results, the exact role of
the saccharide part was further identified by simulation. It
appeared that two sets of hydrogen bonds were involved in the
protofibrils of SL-3F (Scheme S4), including saccharide H-
bonds that were prone to be unstructured as a result of their
steric nature29 and peptide H-bonds that having high
propensity for forming β-sheet.30,31 The quantitative compar-
ison revealed that saccharide H-bonds were slightly more than
peptide H-bonds (Figure 3g), allowing the unstructured
saccharide H-bonds, to some extent, to perturb the arrange-
ment of regular peptide H-bonds. Thus, the secondary
6626
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 6622−6633