R. Moreno-Fuquen, M.M. Hincapié-Otero, D. Becerra et al.
Journal of Molecular Structure 1226 (2021) 129317
methanol at room temperature under ambient atmosphere. Al-
though N-aroyl-1,2,4-triazoles 3a-b were synthesized three decades
ago [19,28]; the structural and electronic information obtained
from spectroscopic, crystallographic, and DFT quantum-chemical
analysis has not been reported.
(μ), electronegativity (χ) and hardness (η). The molecular elec-
trostatic potential analysis is presented as a powerful tool for the
knowledge of charge distribution and its results can be useful in
determining how molecules interact with each other. The multi-
wfn algorithm was used for these calculations [35]. The electronic
absorption spectra were obtained from TD-DFT calculations using
the same method and level of theory used to estimate the vibra-
tional frequencies and the integrated integral equation formalism
for the polarizable continuum model (IEFPCM) was applied to con-
sider solvent effects in the calculation.
2.2.2. 1-(4-Methylbenzoyl)−3-methylsulfanyl-5-amino-1,2,4-triazole
(3a, TAM)
Following the general procedure, the reaction of 1 (260 mg)
with 4-methylbenzoyl chloride (2a) (264 μL) and triethylamine
(334 μL) afforded amide TAM (3a) as a white solid [462 mg,
93% yield, m.p. 461–462 K (amorphous)]. Lit. 459–461 K [19]. Rf
(CH2Cl2/MeOH: 30/1) = 0.36. Recrystallization of TAM (3a) from
methanol afforded crystalline white prisms suitable for single-
crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3):
δ = 2.43 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.53 (s, 3H, SCH3), 6.91 (br s, 2H, NH2),
7.28 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 8.15 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, Ar–H) ppm.
13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 13.7 (SCH3), 21.8 (CH3), 128.9
(CH), 131.6 (Cq), 131.6 (CH), 144.4 (Cq), 158.9 (Cq), 162.5 (Cq), 167.5
(Cq) ppm. The UV−Vis spectra of 3a (50 μM) was obtained in
methanol with a λmax at 248 nm and 289 nm. MS (70 eV) m/z (%):
248 (12, M+), 119 (100), 91 (91), 74 (29), 65 (52) (see Supporting
Information).
2.4. Refinement and data collection strategy
Crystal data, data collection, and structure refinement details
are summarized in Table 1. The X-ray intensity data were mea-
sured at room temperature [298 (2) K] using CuKα radiation
˚
(λ = 1.54184 A), and ω scans, in an Agilent SuperNova, Dual, Cu at
Zero, Atlas four-circle diffractometer equipped with a CCD plate de-
tector. The collected frames were integrated with the CrysAlis PRO
software package (CrysAlisPro 1.171.39.46e, Rigaku Oxford Diffrac-
tion, 2018). Data were corrected for the absorption effect using the
CrysAlis PRO software package by the empirical absorption correc-
tion using spherical harmonics, implemented in the SCALE3 AB-
SPACK scaling algorithm. The final anisotropic full-matrix least-
squares refinements on F2 with 163, and 161 variables converged
at R1 = 5.3%, and 3.5% for the observed data, and R2 = 13.7%
and 9.2% for all data. The goodness-of-fit was 1.07 and 1.04 for
TAM (3a) and TACI (3b), respectively. The largest peaks in the fi-
2.2.3. 1-(4-Chlorobenzoyl)−3-methylsulfanyl-5-amino-1,2,4-triazole
(3b, TACl)
Following the general procedure, the reaction of 1 (260 mg), 4-
chlorobenzoyl chloride (2b) (256 μL) and triethylamine (334 μL)
afforded compound TACl (3b) as a white solid [520 mg, 97% yield,
m.p. 458 K (amorphous)]. Lit. 448–450 K [28]. Rf (CH2Cl2/MeOH:
30/1) = 0.28. Recrystallization of TACl (3b) from methanol afforded
crystalline white prisms suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction
analysis. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.53 (s, 3H, SCH3), 6.84
(br s, 2H, NH2), 7.46 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 8.21 (d, J = 8.4 Hz,
2H, Ar–H) ppm. 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 13.7 (SCH3),
128.5 (CH), 130.0 (Cq), 132.9 (CH), 140.0 (Cq), 159.0 (Cq), 163.2
(Cq), 166.5 (Cq) ppm. The UV−Vis spectra of 3b (50 μM) was ob-
tained in methanol with a λmax at 248 nm and 304 nm. MS (70 eV)
m/z (%): 270/268 (9/24, M+), 141/139 (32/100), 113/111 (34/94), 85
(27), 75 (67) (see Supporting Information).
−
3
˚
nal difference electron density synthesis were 0.253/0.304 e /A ,
−
3
˚
and the largest holes were −0.248/−0.271 e /A with RMS devi-
−
3
˚
ations of 0.05/0.04 e /A , respectively. Table 1 shows the num-
ber of measured reflections (the total number of intensities, ex-
cluding reflections that are classed as systematically absent aris-
ing from translational symmetry), independent reflections (include
Friedel-equivalent reflections, i.e. symmetry-equivalent under Laue
symmetry but inequivalent under crystal class), and observed re-
flections (significantly intense, satisfying the criterion specified by
I > 2\σ(I) and may include Friedel-equivalent reflections) (see dic-
tionary at enCIFer version1.51.).
All the non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically, while
the hydrogen atoms were generated geometrically, placed in calcu-
˚
–
lated positions (C H = 0.93−0.96 A), and included as riding con-
tributions with isotropic displacement parameters set at 1.2 − 1.5
times the Ueq value of the parent atom. H atoms belonging to N—
H groups were located in difference density maps and were re-
fined freely. The crystal structures were refined using the program
SHELXL2014 [36]. Molecular and supramolecular graphics were car-
ried out using the software Mercury [37]. Single crystals of N-
aroyl-1,2,4-triazoles 3 suitable for diffraction analysis were grown
via slow evaporation from methanol at room temperature under
ambient atmosphere.
2.3. Computational study
The geometry optimization of the 1-(aroyl)−3-methylsulfanyl-
5-amino-1,2,4-triazoles 3a-3b was performed using Density Func-
tional Theory (DFT) Becke’s three-parameter hybrid function with
the non-local correlation of Lee-Yang-Parr (B3LYP) method at 6–
31G(d,p) basis set [29–31]. A linear regression analysis using re-
sults from two basis sets 6–31G(d,p) and 6–311+G(d,p) showed
that the base 6–31G(d,p) achieved a better behavior in the analysis
of the properties of these compounds with a minor computational
cost (see Supporting Information). The corresponding harmonic vi-
brational frequencies were computed at the same level of theory to
characterize them as minima (no imaginary frequencies) using the
Gaussian09 package program [32], and the zero-point energy (ZPE)
corrections were also performed at the same level of theory. The
assignment of the calculated frequencies was carried out based on
potential energy distribution (PED) analysis, using the “Vibrational
Energy Distribution Analysis” (VEDA4) program [33], and the vibra-
tions were visualized with the program Gauss View 5.0.8 [34]. The
DFT calculations have sought to establish the stability of synthe-
sized 1,2,4-triazole-based amides with the help of quantum chem-
ical descriptors such as Frontier molecular orbitals, HOMO-LUMO
energy gap, and global reactivity descriptors such as potential (IP),
electron affinity (EA), electrophilicity index (ω), chemical potential
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Synthesis of 1-(aroyl)−3-methylsulfanyl-5-amino-1,2,4-triazole
3a-b
The synthesis of amide-containing N-heterocyclic compounds
has received augmented interest over the past decades due to their
broad range of applications in medicinal chemistry, drug design,
and the pharmaceutical industry. The most traditional and sim-
ple procedure for the synthesis of an amide consists of a nucle-
ophilic acyl substitution between an aroyl chloride and an amine
in the presence of a base [17,22]. Applying this procedure to the
stirring of an equimolar mixture of the NH-1,2,4-triazole 1 and 4-
methylbenzoyl chloride (2a) in dichloromethane as solvent and tri-
3