facilitate the discovery of novel chemical entities through extensive
biological evaluations.
In conclusion, we have developed a branching DOS pathway
leading to the synthesis of a natural product-like small molecule
library embedded with a privileged benzopyran motif. The endo-
selectivity in a Diels–Alder reaction yielded compounds with
complex and diverse core skeletons. The resulting heterocycles
were further diversified by simple transformation in order to
quadruple the number of compounds using a single set of building
blocks, which maximizes the atom efficiency in library construc-
tion and the drastic differentiation in the 3-D orientations of
appendices on diverse polyheterocycles as biopolymer-binding
elements. At the same time, these pathways furnished substrate-
controlled diastereochemical enrichment. The preliminary biologi-
cal evaluation of these core skeletons with a benzopyran
substructure provided fruitful results, and the construction of the
full-scale small molecule library through these pathways on solid
support is currently underway. We envision that these molecules
will provide valuable tools for the drug discovery process as well as
for the exploration of biological space.
This work is supported by (1) MarineBio21, Ministry of
Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, Korea (MOMAF), (2) Center for
Biological Modulators (CBM) of the 21st Century Frontier R&D
Program, the Ministry of Science and Technology, Korea
(MOST), and (3) Korean Science and Engineering Foundation
(KOSEF). K.S.K., H.J.J. and K.E. are grateful for the award of a
BK21 fellowship.
Scheme 2 Pathways A2 & 3 and B2 & 3.
subjected to in vitro cytotoxicity assay against human cancer cell
line (A549 lung carcinoma cell)14 to emphasize the structure–
activity relationship based on skeletal diversity (see ESI{). Cell
viability assay demonstrated interesting results (Table 2); the
compounds exhibited a wide range of IC50 values. For instance,
9b-3 demonstrated excellent in vitro cytotoxicity (IC50 = 1.0 mM)
which is 30–60 fold more potent than 10a-3, 10b-3, and 11b-3, a set
of molecules with same appendices and different core skeletons.
These examples show the importance of core skeletons, not
appendices for their biological activities. The ultimate aim of this
study was to emphasize the importance of well-designed diverse
core skeletons in small molecule collections, and dramatic
differences in in vitro cytotoxicity assay results demonstrated the
high correlation of core skeletons with their biological activities.
Thus, DOS with unbiased skeletal diversity embedded with
privileged structural motif might provide a systematic strategy to
Notes and references
1 Review: (a) R. Balamurugan, F. J. Dekker and H. Waldmann, Mol.
BioSyst., 2005, 1, 36; (b) D. A. Horton, G. T. Bourne and M. L. Smythe,
Chem. Rev., 2003, 103, 893 (and references therein); (c) R. E. Ziegert,
J. Tora¨ng, K. Knepper and S. Bra¨se, J. Comb. Chem., 2005, 7, 147.
2 (a) S. L. Schreiber, Science, 2000, 287, 1964; (b) M. D. Burke and
S. L. Schreiber, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 46; (c) T. U. Mayer,
Science, 1999, 286, 971.
3 (a) H. E. Pelish and M. D. Shair, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 6740; (b)
S. L. Schreiber, Chem. Eng., 2003, 3, 51.
4 Energy minimized conformer of each molecules were calculated and
aligned with Accelrys Cerius 2 software.
5 (a) E. J. Martin and R. E. Critchlow, J. Comb. Chem., 1999, 1, 32; (b)
S. J. Teague and A. M. Davis, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 3743.
6 (a) K. C. Nicolaou and H. J. Mitchell, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122,
9939; (b) Y. D. Gong and S. E. Yoo, J. Comb. Chem., 2003, 5, 577; (c)
J. Y. Hwang and Y. D. Gong, J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70, 10151; (d)
K. C. Nicolaou and J. A. Prefferkorn, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2003, 1, 908;
(e) K. Sivakumar and Q. Wang, Org. Lett., 2004, 6, 4603; (f)
V. A. Ashwood and K. Willcocks, J. Med. Chem., 1986, 29, 2194; (g)
R. Bergmann and R. Gericke, J. Med. Chem., 1990, 33, 2759.
7 J. M. Ostresh, B. Do¨rner, S. E. Blondelle and R. A. Houghten,
Combinatorial Chemistry – Synthesis and Application, ed. S. R. Wilson
and A. W. Czarnik, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1997, 225.
8 (a) J. A. Tallarico and M. D. Shair, J. Comb. Chem., 2001, 3, 312; (b)
O. Kwon, S. B. Park and S. L. Schreiber, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124,
13402.
Table 2 Cell viability test of representative compounds
Compound
ID
IC50/mM
(A549)
Core Type R1
R2 R3 R4
9b-3
IIb
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
H
Bn
Bn
Bn
Bn
Ph
Ph
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Bn
Bn
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
NO2-Ph
1.0
33.5
63.9
28.6
7.0
11.1
30.0
6.5
39.2
157.2
25.9
53.4
10a-3
10b-3
11b-3
15a-2
15b-2
15a-3
15b-3
15b-4
20b-1
23b-1
25b-2
IIIa
IIIb
IVb
VIIa
VIIb
VIIa
VIIb
VIIIb
Vb
9 US Pat., 1993, Dec. 7, patent number 5,268.
10 (a) S. E. Yoo and N. C. Jeong, Bio. Med. Chem. Lett., 1992, 2, 381; (b)
R. Bergmann and R. Gericke, J. Med. Chem., 1992, 33, 492.
11 Review: P. Espinet and A. M. Echavarren, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2004, 43, 4704.
12 (a) L. V. Lee and C. H. Wong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 9588; (b)
Z. P. Demko and K. B. Sharless, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 2110.
13 (a) S. R. Chemler and S. J. Danishefsky, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001,
40, 4544; (b) O. Takayuki and A. Suzuki, J. Org. Chem., 1993, 58, 2201.
14 T. Mosmann, J. Immunol. Methods, 1983, 65, 55.
H
MeOCH2 Ph
MeOCH2 Ph
H
—
—
—
Ph
—
—
—
Xb
VIb
2964 | Chem. Commun., 2006, 2962–2964
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006