Tsubaki et al.
SCHEME 1. Oxidative Coupling of Binaphthalenes 1a-d
been recently reported, each is comprised of aryl rings that are
directly connected to each other.7 Hence, completely controlling
the number of aryl rings, axial chirality, and the type and/or
arrangement of the functional groups on the aryl rings are
difficult tasks. We have investigated optically active rod-shaped
oligo(2,3-dioxyfunctionalized)naphthalenes, which are connected
at the 1,4-positions in a copper-promoted oxidative homocou-
pling reaction.8 Important characteristics of these oligonaph-
thalenes are: (1) a rigid framework in the rod direction, (2)
around the axes, they have chirality and some degree of
flexibility, and (3) functional groups can be introduced into
scaffolding 2,3-dioxy groups. In constructing optically active
oligonaphthalenes, the toughest synthetic difficulty is forming
axial bonds with high optical purity. Although optically active
naphthalene derivatives have been used as substrates, previous
papers have reported that in a homocoupling reaction, the
corresponding dimers were obtained with low diastereoselec-
tivities (∼10% de).8b,d,9a Thus, effective chirality induction from
the optically active axis to the newly formed axis did not occur.
To overcome this low diastereoselectivity, Okamoto and Habaue
applied a catalytic amount of copper(I) and a chiral diamine
combination, which gave an excellent enantiomeric excess of
the coupling of 2-naphthols toward polymerization of the chiral
binaphthalene as a monomer unit.9 They obtained quaternaph-
thalene with a 64% de in the dimerization of a chiral binaph-
thalene derivative.9a We have also been investigating the
synthesis of optically active oligonaphthalenes. In this paper,
we report the asymmetric synthesis of optically active oligo-
naphthalenes through three different pathways, which depend
on the variations of the naphthalene side chains.
TABLE 1. Oxidative Coupling of Binaphthalenes 1a-d
entry substrate amine major isomera isolationb yield (%)c de (%)d
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8e
9
(S)-1a (RS)-3
(S,S,S)-2a
-
-
PF
P
73
69
87
58
15
77
54
75
55
96
81
89
94
77
77
12
26
75
93
17
82
79
19
62
75
75
70
81
62
65
(R)-3
(S)-3
(S)-3
(S)-3
F
(S)-1b (R)-3
(R)-1b (RS)-3
(R)-3
(S,S,S)-2b
(R,R,R)-2b
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
10
(S)-1c (RS)-3
(R)-3
(S)-3
4
(S)-1d (S)-3
(RS)-3
(S,S,S)-2c
11
12
13
14
15
(S,S,S)-2d
a Absolute configuration of major isomer was determined by transforma-
tion to the known compound or an X-ray analysis. See text. b - ) no
precipitation; PF ) without separation of precipitate and filtrate; P ) from
precipitate; F ) from filtrate. c Isolated yield. d Based on the isolated yields
of corresponding diastereomers. e Reaction temperature ) 0 °C to rt.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis of the Quaternaphthalenes from Homocoupling
of Optically Active Binaphthalenes. Diastereoselectivities were
investigated using optically active binaphthalenes 1a-d,10 which
possessed several types of side chains, under copper(II)-
promoted oxidative coupling conditions (Scheme 1 and Table
1).
of substrate and amine. In the early stage of our studies, we
tried to explain these diastereoselectivities by a single pathway.
However, we noticed that a large amount of brown precipitate
was generated only when (S)-1-phenylethylamine (3) and (S)-
1a, which have a methoxy group on naphthalene (Table 1, entry
3), were combined. This led us to consider that there was more
than one pathway triggering these diastereoselectivities.
For (S)-1a (entries 1-5), diastereoselectivity (12% de) was
barely observed using (RS)- or (R)-1-phenylethylamine (3),
whereas (S)-3 gave a high selectivity (75% de) and a brown
precipitate (entries 1, 2 vs 3). Brussee,11 Kocˇovsky´,12 and
Wulff13 have reported that copper- and amine-mediated dera-
cemization of binol derivatives together with diastereoselective
crystallization afforded chiral binol in a high enantio excess.
To confirm the mechanism of the high de for (S)-1a and (S)-3,
the brown precipitate was removed by filtration. Next, the
precipitate and the filtrate were separately purified (entries 4
and 5). An extremely high diastereoselectivity was observed
from the precipitate (93% de, 58% yield), but the filtrate gave
a low selectivity (17% de, 15% yield). Furthermore, the same
Table 1 overviews the results. Moderate to good diastereo-
selectivities were observed under the appropriate combination
(7) (a) Pu, L. Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 2405-2494. (b) Inoue, S.; Nakanishi,
H.; Takimiya, K.; Aso, Y.; Otsubo, T. Synth. Met. 1997, 84, 341-342. (c)
Yamaguchi, S.; Goto, T.; Tamao, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
1695-1697. (d) Meier, H.; Hormaza, A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 3372-
3377. (e) Izumi, T.; Kobashi, S.; Takimiya, K.; Aso, Y.; Otsubo, T. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5286-5287. (f) Miyata, Y.; Nishinaga, T.; Komatsu,
K. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 1147-1153.
(8) (a) Tanaka, K.; Furuta, T.; Fuji, K.; Miwa, Y.; Taga, T. Tetrahe-
dron: Asymmetry 1996, 7, 2199-2202. (b) Fuji, K.; Furuta, T.; Tanaka,
K. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 169-171. (c) Tsubaki, K.; Tanaka, H.; Furuta, T.;
Tanaka, K.; Kinoshita, T.; Fuji, K. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 5611-5617. (d)
Furuta, T.; Tanaka, K.; Tsubaki, K.; Fuji, K. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 4431-
4441. (e) Pieraccini, S.; Ferrarini, A.; Fuji, K.; Gottarelli, G.; Lena, S.;
Tsubaki, K.; Spada, G. P. Chem.-Eur. J. 2006, 12, 1121-1126. (f) Tsubaki,
K.; Miura, M.; Nakamura, A.; Kawabata, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47,
1241-1244. (g) Tsubaki, K.; Takaishi, K.; Tanaka, H.; Miura, M.;
Kawabata, T. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2587-2590.
(9) (a) Habaue, S.; Seko, T.; Okamoto, Y. Macromolecules 2002, 35,
2437-2439. (b) Habaue, S.; Seko, T.; Okamoto, Y. Macromolecules 2003,
36, 2604-2608. (c) Habaue, S.; Seko, T.; Isonaga, M.; Ajiro, H.; Okamoto,
Y. Polym. J. 2003, 35, 592-597. (d) Habaue, S.; Ajiro, H.; Yoshii, Y.;
Hirasa, T. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2004, 42, 4528-4534. (e)
Habaue, S.; Muraoka, R.; Aikawa, A.; Murakami, S.; Higashimura, H. J.
Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2005, 43, 1635-1640. (f) Temma, T.;
Habaue, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 5655-5657. (g) Habaue, S.;
Ishikawa, K. Polym. Bull. 2005, 55, 243-250.
(11) (a) Brussee, J.; Jansen, A. C. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 3261-
3262. (b) Brussee, J.; Groenendijk, J. L. G.; te Koppele, J. M.; Jansen, A.
C. A. Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 3313-3319.
(12) (a) Smrcˇina, M.; Lorenc, M.; Hanusˇ, V.; Sedmera, P.; Kocˇovsky´,
P. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 1917-1920. (b) Smrcˇina, M.; Pola´kova´, J.;
Vyskocˇil, S.; Kocˇovsky´, P. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 4534-4538.
(13) Zhang, Y.; Yeung, S.-M.; Wu, H.; Heller, D. P.; Wu, C.; Wulff,
W. D. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1813-1816.
(10) The optically active binaphthalenes 1a-d were synthesized from
the corresponding dibenzyl derivatives (Supporting Information).
6580 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 71, No. 17, 2006