Buckner et al.
Instrumentation. All solution measurements were made at 298
K unless otherwise stated. IR measurements were made using
solution cells in a Perkin-Elmer RX-I FTIR spectrometer. NMR
measurements were recorded using a Varian Gemini 300 MHz
stroboscopic detection system with an R928 photomultiplier. The
decays were analyzed with a PTI FeliX32 advanced analysis
package utilizing a discrete multiexponential fitting function and
iterative reconvolution.
1
spectrometer, H (300.0 MHz); 13C (75.4 MHz);11B (96.3 MHz);
Synthesis of [7,10-µ-H-7-CO-7,7-(PPh3)2-isonido-7,8,9-ReC2-
B7H9]. Compound 1 (0.10 g, 0.20 mmol) and PPh3 (0.16 g, 0.59
mmol) were combined in a three-necked flask fitted with a
condenser, which is in turn connected to an Ar/vacuum Schlenk
line. The reactants were dissolved in dry distilled THF (30 mL)
and heated to reflux for 24 h. After the mixture cooled to room
temperature, solvent was removed in vacuo. The residue was
dissolved in CH2Cl2/hexanes (10 mL, 1:1) and chromatographed
on alumina (Brockmann IV) at -25 °C. Elution with the same
solvent mixture removed an intense orange-red fraction. Solvent
was reduced in volume to 2 mL and hexanes added (5 mL) to afford
bright orange-red microcrystals of 2 (0.03 g, 18%), which were
washed with hexanes (3 × 20 mL) and dried in vacuo. X-ray-quality
crystals were grown from a CH2Cl2 solution of 2 layered with
hexanes. A second rhenacarborane-carbonyl product was eluted
from the column using neat CH2Cl2 but has not yet been identified.
Data for 2 (298 K): IR (CH2Cl2) (cm-1) νmax(BH) 2550m, νmax(CO)
1928s, νmax(CC-n) 1430m, 1434m; 1H{11B} NMR (CD2Cl2) δ
7.73-7.04 (m, 30 H, Ph), 10.80, 3.80, 2.12, 1.67*, 0.61, 0.13, -1.69
1
31P (121.4 MHz), or a Bruker ARX 500 MHz spectrometer, H
(500.1 MHz); 13C (125.6 MHz);11B (160.5 MHz); 31P (202.5 MHz).
Selective decoupling experiments and 2D spectra were exclusively
measured on the latter instrument. Electrochemical experiments
were performed with a CH Instruments CHI620B electrochemical
analyzer. All potentials were recorded relative to an Ag/AgNO3
(MeCN, 10 mM) reference electrode at 298 K and quoted relative
to an internal ferrocene standard. All solutions were studied in a
three-electrode cell under Ar in distilled, deoxygenated solvents
and contained 0.1 M [NBun ][PF6] as supporting electrolyte. All
4
CV and DPV measurements were made on a glassy carbon disk
working electrode with a surface area of 7.07 mm2, which was
frequently polished, rinsed, and dried between measurements. The
Pt wire counter electrode was precleaned by soaking in concentrated
HNO3, rinsed with distilled water, and then flame-dried. Cyclic
voltammograms were run both with initial positive and negative
scan polarities, and showed little variation with this parameter.
Digital simulations were carried out using DigiElch.26 UV-vis
spectral measurements (800 f 220 nm) were made with a Shimadzu
2530 UV-visible absorption spectrophotometer. Photoluminescence
measurements were made with a Photon Technologies QM4
fluorescence spectrophotometer with a Xe arc lamp light source
and digital PMT detector. Emission and reference source gain
excitation corrections were applied to all steady-state data. Slit
widths were typically set at 5 nm. Appropriate cutoff filters were
used to eliminate peaks due to solvent Raman-shifted bands and
excitation harmonics when possible. Solution samples at ambient
temperatures were measured in a quartz sample cuvette with
Schlenk attachment to deoxygenate samples. Samples measured at
77 K were degassed and analyzed in a quartz NMR tube with
Schlenk attachment and set in quartz-bottomed Dewar flask in an
argon-filled sample chamber. The quantum yield was assessed by
comparison of integrated peak intensities between those of complex
2 for the full range of emission wavelengths and the singlet emission
from deoxygenated 9-cyanoanthracene in hexane, which has Φem
) 1.00. The concentration of the complex 2 solution was adjusted
to give an accurately measured absorbance of ca. 0.1 A at λex. A
standard solution of 9-cyanoanthracene was similarly created and
its integrated emission intensity measured using an optical density
(OD1) filter at the emission monochromator entrance at consistently
fixed slit widths for all measurements. Quantum yields were then
calculated according to
(s × 7, 7 H, cage BH, * 2JH H ) 14), 3.27, 2.64 (s × 2, 2 H, cage
7
10
CH), -7.61 (d br, 1 H, endo-H, 2JH H ) 14); 13C{1H} NMR (CD2-
7
10
1
Cl2) δ 208.8 (CO), 134.5, 134.2 (d × 2, Ci(Ph), JPC ) 47, 47),
2
133.6, 133.5 (d × 2, Co(Ph), JPC ) 11, 10), 135.8, 135.2 (d × 2,
4
3
Cp(Ph), JPC ) 2, 2), 128.2, 127.7 (d × 2, Cm(Ph), JPC ) 10, 9),
45.5, 39.5 (br × 2, cage C); 31P{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2) δ 12.5, 12.0
(s × 2); 11B{1H} NMR (CD2Cl2) δ (T1) 86.7 (0.69 ( 0.03 ms),
-2.8 (1.20 ( 0.08 ms), -4.0 (2.30 ( 0.08 ms), -11.9 (1.20 (
0.06 ms), -18.3 (1.14 ( 0.04 ms), -24.2 (1.10 ( 0.06 ms), -26.4
(1.21 ( 0.05 ms) (s × 7); UV-vis. (CH2Cl2) λmax (nm) (ꢀ × 10-3
(M-1 cm-1)) 266sh (17.3), 276sh (16.0), 297 (13.9), 355sh (7.2),
424 (1.5), 493 (1.5); Anal. Calcd for C39H40B7OP2Re: C, 55.2; H,
4.8. Found: C, 54.8; H, 5.0.
X-ray Crystallography. A crystal of 2 was mounted onto a glass
fiber in a random orientation. Preliminary examination and data
collection were performed using a Siemens SMART charge-coupled
device (CCD) detector system single-crystal X-ray diffractometer
equipped with a sealed-tube X-ray source using graphite-mono-
chromated Mo KR radiation (λ ) 0.71073 Å). Preliminary unit
cell constants were determined with a set of 45 narrow-frame scans
(0.3° in ω). A total of 4026 frames of intensity data were collected
at a crystal-to-detector distance of 4.91 cm. The double-pass method
of scanning was used to reduce noise. The collected frames were
integrated using an orientation matrix determined from the narrow-
frame scans. The SMART software package was used for data
collection, and SAINT27 was used for frame integration. Analysis
of the integrated data did not show any decay. Final cell constants
were determined by a global refinement of the x, y, z centroids of
thresholded reflections from the entire dataset. Absorption correc-
tions were applied to the data using equivalent reflections (SAD-
ABS).28 The SHELX-9729 software package was used for structure
solutions (by direct methods) and refinement. Full-matrix least-
squares refinement was carried out by minimizing ∑ w(Fo2 - Fc2)2.
The non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically to conver-
gence. Noncage hydrogen atoms were included in calculated
positions and treated using appropriate riding models. Cage
Iint,x/fx
Φem
)
(Iint,c/fc) × 100
where Iint ) integrated intensity, f ) fraction of light absorbed for
a solution of complex 2 (x) and of 9-cyanoanthracene (c). Integrated
emission intensities, Iint, were thus corrected for self-absorption
using transmission data parameters from the UV-vis absorption
spectra over the width of the emission band. Accurate fluorescence
decays from compound 2 were measured with a PTI model TM-
3/2005 lifetime fluorescence spectrophotometer. The instrument
employed a PTI GL-330 pulsed nitrogen laser pumping a PTI GL-
302 tunable dye laser as an excitation source and a proprietary
(27) SAINT; Bruker Analytical X-ray: Madison, WI, 2002.
(28) Blessing, R. H. Acta Crystallogr. 1995, A51, 33.
(29) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELX-97; University of Go¨ttingen: Go¨ttingen,
Germany, 1997.
(26) Rudolph, M. DigiElch ver. 2.0; Friedrich-Schiller-Universita¨t: Jena,
Germany, 2005.
7346 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 45, No. 18, 2006