J. S. Park et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 3486–3490
Table 4. In vitro hepatocyte toxicity of the selected analogs
3489
11a
12j
11o
11r
Ketoconazole
51.0 1.6
CC50 (lM)
599.0 124.4
141.3 4.3
8.1 2.31a
2.9 2.8a
a % Inhibition at 50 lM. Values are means of two or three (for CC50) experiments.
Table 5. In vivo efficacy (mean survival days) in Candida albicans
infection model in mice
promising leads for antifungal therapy. These analogs
showed potent antifungal activity, broad spectrum, sig-
nificantly low hepatocyte toxicity, and good oral efficacy.
Mean survival days
Control
11a
11c
12j
6.1
3.5
2.0
7.2
12.4a
13.5a
Acknowledgment
nd, not determined.
a P < 0.05 versus each vehicle control.
We thank the Pharmacology and Toxicology Research
group of Daewoong Pharm. Co., Ltd for their kind sup-
port for this work.
11h–j. However, The N-2 regioisomers 12b, d having ni-
tro groups were quite less active than the N-1 isomers
11b–e.
References and notes
1. Sheehan, D. J.; Hitchcock, C. A.; Sibley, C. M. Clin.
Microbiol. Rev. 1999, 12, 40.
Next, we investigated the C3-substituent (R2 group) ef-
fect of indazole ring on the antifungal activity, as shown
in Table 2. The antifungal activity decreased as the size
of the R2 increases. Especially, the phenyl derivative 11l
was almost devoid of antifungal activity. In addition,
the MICs of the analogs 11m, 11o, and 11p possessing
methyl as R2 and fluorine as R1 at various positions
were compared. Again, the 5-fluoro analog 11m turned
out to be the most potent compound among the C3-
methyl (R2) series. The other C3-methyl analogs 11q
and 11r were almost inactive against Aspergillus spp.
2. (a) Vanden Bossche, H. In Curr. Top. Med. Mycol.;
McGuinnis, M. R., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, 1985; Vol. 1, p
313; (b) Aoyama, Y.; Yoshida, Y.; Sato, R. J. Biol. Chem.
1984, 259, 1661; (c) Trzaskos, J. M.; Bowen, W. D.;
Shafiee, A.; Fischer, R. T.; Gaylor, J. L. J. Biol. Chem.
1984, 259, 13402.
3. Karyotakis, N. C.; Anaissie, E. J. Curr. Opin. Inf. Dis.
1994, 7, 658.
4. Zervos, M.; Meunier, F. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 1993, 3,
147.
5. Como, A. C.; Dismukes, W. E. New Engl. J. Med. 1994,
330, 263.
6. (a) Dickinson, R. P.; Bell, A. S.; Hitchcock, C. A.;
Nayayanaswami, S.; Ray, S. J.; Richardson, K.; Troke, P.
F. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1996, 6, 2031; (b) Herbrecht,
R. Expert Rev. AntiInfect. Ther. 2004, 2, 485.
7. (a) Bartroli, J.; Turmo, E.; Alguero, M.; Boncompte, E.;
Vericat, M. L.; Conte, L.; Ramis, J.; Merlos, M.; Garcia-
Rafanell, J.; Forn, J. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 1869; (b)
Ramos, G.; Cuenca-Estrella, M.; Monzon, A.; Rodriguez-
Tudela, J. L. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1999, 44, 283; (c)
Sorbera, L. A.; Bartroli, J.; Castan˜er, J. Drugs Future
2003, 28, 529.
8. (a) Tsuruoka, A.; Kaku, Y.; Kakinuma, H.; Tsukada, I.;
Yanagisawa, M.; Nara, K.; Naito, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull.
1998, 46, 623; (b) Fung-Tomc, J. C.; Huczko, E.;
Minassian, B.; Bonner, D. P. Antimicrob. Agents Chemo-
ther. 1998, 42, 313; (c) Hata, K.; Kimura, J.; Miki, H.;
Toyosawa, T.; Moriyama, M.; Katsu, K. Antimicrob.
Agents Chemother. 1996, 40, 2243.
Table 3 shows the in vitro activity of 12j against Candida
spp. and Aspergillus spp. The analog 12j exhibited an
excellent antifungal activity and broad spectra against
most of the fungal pathogens tested, which is superior
or comparable to those of the currently available anti-
fungal agents.
The hepatotoxic potential of the analogs 11a, 12j, 11o,
and 11r was determined in human liver cancer cell
HepG2 by the neutral red uptake assay according to
the protocol described previously.18,19 Ketoconazole
was used as a reference antifungal agent. The CC50 (half
concentration of cytotoxicity) value of ketoconazole
(51 lM) was quite close to the CC50 which was previ-
ously reported. The hepatotoxic potentials of all
the tested analogs were lower than that of ketoconazole
(Table 4). In particular, the CC50s of 11a and 12j were
599 lM and 141 lM, respectively.
9. Tasaka, A.; Tamura, N.; Matsushita, Y.; Teranishi, K.;
Hayashi, R.; Okonogi, K.; Itoh, K. Chem. Pharm. Bull.
1993, 41, 1035.
In vivo efficacy of the selected analogs, which exhibited
excellent in vitro antifungal activities, was evaluated in
the systemic C. albicans infection model in mice.20 The
results are summarized in Table 5. Each analog was
compared to the untreated control group. The analogs
11c and 12j showed good efficacies on oral administra-
tion and the significantly improved survival rates of
the infected mice.
10. Konosu, T.; Tajima, Y.; Takeda, N.; Miyaoka, T.;
Kasahara, M.; Yasuda, H.; Oida, S. Chem. Pharm. Bull.
1990, 38, 2476.
11. Richardson, K.; Cooper, K.; Marriott, M. S.; Tarbit, M. H.;
Troke, P. F.; Whittle, P. J. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1988, 544, 6.
12. Tasaka, A.; Tsuchimori, N.; Kitazaki, T.; Hiroe, K.;
Hayashi, R.; Okonogi, K.; Itoh, K. Chem. Pharm. Bull.
1995, 43, 441.
13. (a) Singh, I. P.; Sidhu, I.; Palak, B. U.S. Patent 6,133,485,
2000; (b) Tasaka, A.; Tamura, N.; Matsushita, Y.;
Kitazaki, T.; Hayashi, R.; Okonogi, K.; Itoh, K. Chem.
Pharm. Bull. 1995, 43, 432.
In conclusion, the indazole analogs with C3-H and C5-
halogen substituent, respectively, were identified as the