tocotrienoloic acid (2),5 via an acid-catalyzed cyclodehydra-
tion reaction of a late-stage intermediate utilized for the
synthesis of 1. The synthesis permitted facile access to both
1 and 2, which permitted structure confirmation, as well as
the determination of absolute stereochemistry.
iodide 5 in 96% yield.9 Subsequent protection of the hindered
tertiary alcohol was achieved using TESOTf with 2,6-lutidine
in CH2Cl2 to afford the requisite alkyl iodide derivative 6 in
91% yield.
Several approaches to the vinyl iodide fragment 11 were
Retrosynthetically, we envisioned the separate syntheses
of both the requisite alkyl iodide 6 and vinyl iodide 11,
followed by an sp3-sp2 Suzuki coupling to assemble the
molecule in a convergent and efficient manner, as shown
below. The synthesis of alkyl iodide 6 is outlined in Scheme
1. Installation of the trisubstituted olefin was achieved in
explored; the most efficient route is outlined in Scheme 2.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Vinyl Iodide 11a
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Alkyl Iodide 6a
Construction of the silyl-protected enyne was accomplished
in near quantitative yield via Negishi coupling of 710 and
811 by the use of methodology reported on similar systems.11
Removal of the silyl groups with tetra-n-butylammonium
fluoride (TBAF) in THF at 0 °C gave intermediate 912 in
quantitative yield. Zirconium-catalyzed carboalumination
followed by iodination provided the (E,E)-vinyl iodide in
76% yield. The primary alcohol was then oxidized using
Dess-Martin periodinane13 to yield aldehyde 10 (87%).
Wittig olefination with carbethoxyethylidene triphenylphos-
phorane in toluene at 90 °C gave the desired (E,E,E)-vinyl
iodide 11 in 85% yield with a minor amount (∼5%) of the
undesired (Z)-isomer, which could be easily separated by
column chromatography.
96% yield via a Horner-Emmons reaction of 36 with triethyl
phosphonoacetate by the use of sodium hydride as the base.7
The resulting R,â-unsaturated ethyl ester was reduced to the
requisite allylic alcohol with DIBAL-H in good yield (93%).
Asymmetric Sharpless epoxidation was accomplished by
using the (+)-DET ligand to give the (S,S)-trisubstituted
epoxide 4 in high yield (84%) and ee (95%).8 Regioselective
hydride delivery to the less substituted C of the epoxide was
achieved with Red-Al (sodium bis(2-methoxyethoxy)alumi-
num hydride) in THF at 0 °C to give the desired 1,3-diol in
97% yield. Selective mesylation of the primary alcohol
(methanesulfonyl chloride and NEt3 in CH2Cl2 at 0 °C) gave
the mesylate in 85% yield. Nucleophilic displacement of the
mesylate with NaI-saturated acetone at reflux then gave alkyl
With both the alkyl iodide 6 and vinyl iodide 11 in hand,
the Suzuki coupling was attempted using a variety of
methods. The best results were obtained using 9-MeO-9-
BBN, t-BuLi, K3PO4, Pd(dppf)Cl2, and 1.5 equiv of 11 to
give the desired coupled product in 65-81% yields (Scheme
3).14 Deprotection of the TES-protected tertiary alcohol
proceeded smoothly with 6 equiv of TBAF to afford key
intermediate 12 in 92% yield. Saponification of the ethyl
ester using K2CO3 in aqueous MeOH followed by mild
(4) Deng, J.-Z.; Sun, D.-A.; Starck, S. R.; Hecht, S. M.; Cerny, R. L.;
Engen, J. R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1999, 1147. Structural
assignment was based on NMR (1H, 13C, 2D experiment) and HRMS [M
- H2O], and involved the assumption that the tertiary OH group had been
lost during mass spectrometric analysis. In fact the mass spectrum of
synthetic 1 did reflect some dehydration.
(5) (a) Monache, F. D.; Marta, M.; Mac-Quhae, M. M.; Nicoletti, Gazz.
Chim. Ital. 1984, 114, 135. (b) Setzer, W. N.; Green, T. J.; Lawton, R. O.;
Moriarity, D. M.; Bates, R. B.; Caldera, S.; Haber, W. A. Planta Med.
1995, 61, 275, from ToVomitopsis psychotriifolia. (c) Terashima, K.;
Shimamura, T.; Tanabayashi, M.; Aqil, M.; Akinniyl, J. A.; Niwa, M.
Heterocycles 1997, 45, 1559, from Garcinia kola.
(9) While the 1,3-diol could be converted to the alkyl iodide directly
using PPh3, imidazole, and I2, the yield was low.
(10) (a) Zheng, Y. F.; Oehlschlager, A. C.; Hartman, P. G. J. Org. Chem.
1994, 59, 5803. (b) Roush, W. R.; Barda, D. A.; Limberakis, C.; Roxanne,
K. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 6433. (c) Groth, U.; Richter, N.; Kalogerakis, A.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 23, 4034.
(11) (a) Foote, K. M.; Hayes, C. J.; John. M. P.; Pattenden, G. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 3917. (b) Negishi, E.; Boardman, L. D.; Sawada,
H.; Bagheri, V.; Stoll, T. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 110, 5383.
(12) Johnson, W. S.; Yarnell, T. M.; Myers, R. F.; Morton, D. R.; Boots,
S. G. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 1254.
(6) See Supporting Information for experimental procedures employed
for the synthesis of 3.
(7) The product was obtained in 6:1 (E/Z) ratio; attempts to improve
this ratio were unsuccessful.
(8) Katsuki, T.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 5976.
Percent ee was determined by analysis of the MTPA ester.
(13) (a) Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4155. (b)
Dess, D. B.; Martin, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 7277.
(14) (a) Johnson, C. R.; Braun, M. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115,
11014. (b) Marshall, J. A.; Bourbeau, M. P. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2751.
4298
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 19, 2005