10416
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10416-10417
Communications to the Editor
resultssonly the two products 9b2 and 10b2 in a 5.3:1 ratio were
formed (58% yield, 92% brsm7), and the ee of 9b was 97%.
Switching to ligand 11 led to slight improvements: 9b and 10b
were obtained in a 6.1:1 ratio (68% yield) and the ee of 9b was
>99%.
With this background, a series of polyenyl substrates as
summarized in Table 1 was examined. While the proximal double
bond must be only disubstituted, the remote double bond can bear
any number of substituents.
Regio- and Enantioselective Molybdenum-Catalyzed
Alkylations of Polyenyl Esters
Barry M. Trost,* Stefan Hildbrand, and Kalindi Dogra
Department of Chemistry, Stanford UniVersity
Stanford, California 94305-5080
ReceiVed July 22, 1999
Generally, trisubstitution on the distal double bond, notably
as in entries 3, 4, 6, and 8, gave higher ee’s than terminal
disubstitution as in entry 7 or disubstitution as in entry 5. The
use of the enol ether as in entry 8 is particularly useful for further
transformations. The trienyl substrates of entries 9 and 10 still
produce only two regioisomeric products with good regioselec-
tivity (∼10-12:1) and excellent ee (97 and 98%).
The use of polyene substrates in allylic alkylations can be
complicated by the issue of regioselectivity, as illustrated in eq
1, as well as reversibility.1,2 Thus, although much work in
asymmetric palladium-catalyzed allylic alkylations has been done,3
the utilization of polyenes has not been explored. One of the
reasons clearly stems from the anticipated selectivity for formation
of the achiral product 2.1d,e On the other hand, switching to
molybdenum should favor either 3 or 4 over 2.4,5 The recent
success in effecting an asymmetric alkylation with cinnamyl
substrates6 induced us to explore its potential with polyene
systems.
In examining the role of the linker heterocycle, we prepared
the 4-pyrimidinecarbonyl ligand 129 to decrease the σ-donation
to the molybdenum. This new ligand system gave slight improve-
ments in either ratio or ee in the two cases examined, entries 6
and 7. Further evaluation of this ligand is underway.
Our initial studies examined the reaction of 5-phenylpentadienyl
methyl carbonate, 5a (eq 2), and dimethyl sodiomalonate, 6, using
Conjugation of the allyl carbonate with an alkyne also led to
no involvement of the triple bond as shown in eq 3. In both cases,
(2)
a catalyst formed in situ from the bis-picolinylamide 7 and the
molybdenum complex 8. Only two alkylation products were
observedsthe branched one, 9a2, and the linear one, 10a1e, in
6.1:1 ratio in 95% isolated yield. None of the product derived
from attack at the benzylic position was observed. Using chiral
HPLC, the ee of 9a was established as 98% (er 99:1). Interest-
ingly, extending the conjugation as in 5b led to virtually the same
the major product (13a:14a 5.3:1, 13b:14b 7.3:1) was the
branched one with excellent ee (13a 99% ee, 13b 99% ee). In
(4) Trost, B. M.; Merlic, C. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 9590; Trost,
B. M.; Lautens, M. Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 4817; Trost, B. M.; Lautens, M. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 1469; 1982, 104, 5543. Also see: Faller, J. W.;
Lambert, C.; Mazzieri, M. R. J. Organomet. Chem. 1990, 383, 161; Faller, J.
W.; Linebarrier, D. Organometallics 1988, 7, 1670.
(1) (a) Trost, B. M.; Bunt, R. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 70. (b)
Nilsson, Y. I. M.; Andersson, P. G.; Backvall, J.-E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993,
115, 6609. (c) Andersson, P. G.; Backvall, J.-E. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 5349.
(d) Trost, B. M.; Lautens, M.; Hung, M.-H.; Carmichael, C. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1984, 106, 7641. (e) Trost, B. M.; Urch, C. J.; Hung, M.-H. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1986, 27, 4949.
(2) Trost, B. M.; Hung, M.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 6837.
(3) For reviews, see: Trost, B. M.; Van Vranken, D. L. Chem. ReV. 1996,
96, 395; Hayashi, T. In Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis; Ojima, I., Ed.; VCH
Publishers: New York, 1993; pp 325-365.
(5) For work on stoichiometric π-allylmolybdenum alkylations, see:
Adams, R. D.; Chodosh, D. F.; Faller, J. W.; Rosan, A. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1979, 101, 2570; McCleverty, J. A.; Murray, A. J. J. Organomet. Chem. 1978,
149, C29; Rubio, A.; Liebeskind, L. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 891.
(6) Trost, B. M.; Hachiya, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 1104. Also
see: Glorius, F.; Pfaltz, A. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 141.
(7) brsm ) based upon reacted starting material.
10.1021/ja992602s CCC: $18.00 © 1999 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 10/26/1999