Goodings and Chen
1439
mol fraction of total tin into the unburnt flame gas. A small
amount of a grey solid, presumably metallic tin, condensed
onto the cooled sampling nozzle and mounting plate placed
in front of the flame. The usual very pale blue colour of the
flames developed a slightly stronger whitish luminosity with
tin present. No evidence was observed for the formation of
solid particles.
As an alternative to individual ions, total positive ion
(TPI) profiles can be measured by switching off the dc volt-
ages to the quadrupole rods. Still with the dc voltages
switched off and the spectrometer’s mass dial set to a given
mass number, all of the ions above that mass number are
collected; e.g., TPI100 designates total positive ions above
100 u which includes just the tin ions whereas TPI12 in-
cludes all the ions (since no measureable flame ions occur
below 12 u). This technique is useful in separating total tin
ions from ions of low mass number such as H3O+, K+, and
Na+ if present. However, the sensitivity of the mass spec-
trometer is different for individual ions and TPI because the
former are measured at fairly high resolution whereas total
ion collection amounts to zero resolution. The former sensi-
tivity is approximately one half of the latter. Since a flame is
a quasi-neutral plasma, [TPI12] is equal to [e–], the concen-
tration of free electrons. It should be pointed out that no
negative tin ions were detected in the FR flames.
A second method of measuring total ion signals was em-
ployed, which has a bearing on calibration procedures. With
an appropriate voltage bias on the sampling plate, the total
current of positive ions passing through the orifice was col-
lected on the ion lens and nose-cone in the first vacuum
chamber; it was measured with a sensitive picoammeter.
This method is appealing when absolute ion concentrations
must be measured because tuning errors and mass discrimi-
nation of individual ions are avoided. The total ion current
was calibrated using the known rate for electron-ion recom-
bination of H3O+ with e–. With the atomizer turned off, 0.25
mol% of CH4 was admitted. From the slope of a second-
order recombination plot together with Butler and
Hayhurst’s rate coefficient k = (3.6 ± 0.5) T –2.1±0.7 cm3 mol-
ecule–1 s–1 (10), a calibration factor was obtained for con-
verting ion current (µA) into ion concentration
(molecule cm–3). The same procedure was employed with
the mass spectrometer for calibrating ion signal (mV) in
terms of ion concentration (molecule cm–3). The calibration
was routinely done for each flame when absolute ion densi-
ties were needed.
On occasion, it was noted that the ion signal slowly and
steadily decreased over a period of several minutes. The
worst cases occurred for the hot flames 2 and 25 when the
burner was moved in close to the sampling nozzle; in these
circumstances, the nozzle can become red hot. A possible
explanation involves the formation of a thin layer of dielec-
tric oxide which coats the orifice rim and subsequently ac-
quires a positive charge which repels incoming positive ions
as they approach the nozzle. Accordingly, the calibration
procedure with CH4 addition was carried out at the begin-
ning and end of each set of tin experiments with each flame,
and the results were accepted only if the calibration factor
remained constant. Calibration procedures for the atomizer
delivery of tin into the flame gas have been given previously
(11, 12).
When the gas is sampled through the nozzle, it cools in
two regions: in the thermal boundary layer surrounding the
orifice and in the near-adiabatic expansion downstream of
the nozzle throat. This can cause a shift of fast equilibrium
reactions in the exothermic direction during sampling. In
particular, ion hydrates can be enhanced with respect to the
parent ion. These sampling problems have been discussed in
The five flames described in Table 1 exhibit only a low
level of natural ionization. It was sometimes advantageous
to add 0.25 mol% of CH4 to the premixed flame gas to pro-
duce a high initial concentration of H3O+ ions stemming
from the chemi-ionization of CH + O near the flame reac-
tion zone; these ions subsequently decay downstream by
electron-ion recombination. With the simultaneous addition
of tin, H3O+ can produce tin ions by chemical ionization
(CI) processes. The addition of CH4 was small enough, how-
ever, so that the flame composition and temperature re-
mained essentially unchanged. In other cases, it was
occasionally desirable to add a small amount of KNO3 to the
tin solution sprayed by the atomizer to produce K+ and free
electrons e– in the flame by collisional (thermal) ionization.
By this means, the electron–ion recombination rate of the tin
ions could be increased; there was no evidence for any di-
rect reaction of K+ with the tin ions. Thus, tin ionization
could be enhanced early in the flame by methane and (or)
suppressed later in the flame by potassium.
The burner is mounted horizontally on a motorized car-
riage with calibrated drive coupled to the X-axis of an XY-re-
corder. The flame axis z is accurately aligned with the
sampling nozzle of the mass spectrometer. The apparatus has
been described in detail previously (8) so only a brief de-
scription will be given here. Flame gas containing ions is
sampled through an orifice in the tip of a conical nozzle pro-
truding from a water-cooled sampling plate. The nozzles
were fabricated by swaging a tiny electron microscope lens
of Pt/Ir alloy into the tip of a 60° stainless-steel cone; orifice
diameters of 0.17 and 0.20 mm were employed. Alterna-
tively, a 60° electroformed nickel nozzle of diameter
0.20 mm exhibited less cooling of the sample in the bound-
ary layer and was used when it was desired to minimize the
formation of ion hydrates. The ions enter a first vacuum
chamber maintained at 0.04 Pa (3 × 10–4 Torr), and are fo-
cused into a beam by an electrostatic lens. The beam then
passes through a 3 mm orifice in the tip of a nose-cone into
a second vacuum chamber pumped to a pressure below
0.003 Pa (2 × 10–5 Torr). The ions traverse a second ion lens
into a quadrupole mass filter in which they have an axial ion
energy of 15 eV. They are detected by a Faraday collector
connected to a vibrating-reed electrometer having a grid-
leak resistance of 1010 ohm; the ion signal is applied to the
Y-axis of the XY-recorder. Thus, ion signal magnitudes
quoted in the figures below as a voltage (in mV) refer to the
collected ion current passing through 1010 ohm. By driving
the flame towards the sampling nozzle, profiles may be ob-
tained of an individual ion signal versus distance along the
flame axis z. The zero on the X-axis distance scale (z = 0) is
defined experimentally where the pressure abruptly rises
when the sampling nozzle pokes through the flame reaction
zone into the cooler unburnt gas upstream. The pressure is
measured with an ionization gauge mounted on the second
vacuum chamber.
© 1998 NRC Canada