1678
J. Lowe et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 1675–1678
OH
isomers, but also the affinity for dofetilide displace-
O
N
O
N
1. CH2(CO2t-Bu)2,
82%
N
N
Cl
ment from the HERG channel is similar, and
hence this structural feature did not offer any
opportunity to separate GlyT1 affinity from HERG
affinity.
O
KOtBu
O
Cl
Cl
2. H3O+, dioxane
3. BH3.SMe2
23%
CN
O
N
1. DIBAL, toluene
1. SOCl2
95%
O
Cl
N
Despite the structural diversity of these series, the com-
bination of a basic head group with a long lipophilic tail,
required for GlyT1 binding activity, predisposes these
compounds to HERG binding and rapid degradation
by human microsomes. These structural motifs may be
a consideration for chemists when they triage hits from
high-throughput screening.
2. HNR2, Na(OAc)3BH
2. Et4N+CN-, CH3CN
20%
75%
H
O
N
N
N
O
Cl
OH
7
Scheme 3. Synthetic scheme for indanyl propylamine analogues
exemplified by compound 7.
While the indane ring system resolves the selectivity
issue, affording potent GlyT1 binding activity, it does
not address either the HERG channel affinity or the
clearance in human microsomes. The next structural
modification was to replace the piperazine with an acy-
clic propylamine chain. The synthesis of this series of
analogues is shown in Scheme 3.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be
References and notes
The key step is the condensation of di-t-butyl malonate
with the indanyl chloride prepared in Scheme 2. Follow-
ing hydrolysis and decarboxylation, conversion to the
chloride and condensation with cyanide afforded
the nitrile. Reduction to the aldehyde and reductive
amination completed the synthesis of compound 7.
Compounds 8–10 were prepared in a similar manner
starting from the corresponding tetralin.
1. Lindsley, C. W.; Shipe, W. D.; Wolkenberg, S. E.;
Theberge, C. R.; Williams, D. L., Jr.; Sur, C.; Kinney,
G. G. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2006, 6, 771.
2. Coyle, J. T.; Tsai, G.; Goff, D. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci 2003,
1003, 318.
3. Laruelle, M.; Frankle, W. G.; Narendran, R.; Kegeles, L.
S.; Abi-Dargham, A. Clin. Ther. 2005, 27, S16.
4. de Bartolomeis, A.; Fiore, G.; Iasevoli, F. Curr. Pharm.
Des. 2005, 11, 3561.
5. Shoham, S.; Mazeh, H.; Javitt, D. C.; Heresco-Levy, U.
Br. Res. 2004, 1004, 142.
6. Kinney, G. G.; Sur, C. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2005, 3, 35.
7. Heresco-Levy, U.; Javitt, D. C. Eur. Neuropsychopharma-
col. 1998, 8, 141.
Although this series introduces further structural novel-
ty, it unfortunately does not resolve the HERG and
clearance issues. Changing the oxadiazole for a pyridine,
in compound 10, does reduce 2D6 inhibition, but does
not reduce HERG binding. A final attempt at structural
diversity was the preparation of compound 11, from
3-hydroxybenzaldehyde by straightforward methods.
This approach also did not resolve the HERG or clear-
ance issues.
8. Heresco-Levy, U.; Javitt, D. C.; Ermilov, M.; Mordel, C.;
Silipo, G.; Lichtenstein, M. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 1999,
56, 29.
9. Aragon, C.; Lopez-Corcuera, B. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2003,
479, 249.
Many of the compounds depicted herein are stereo-
isomeric, and all are indicated as mixtures of enan-
tiomers and/or diastereomers. To examine the role
of stereochemistry in the SAR of this series, com-
pound 8 was separated by chiral HPLC into its
four isomeric components (all data cited are for
N = 1): isomer 8A, aD = +3.5°, GlyT1 IC50 = 38 nM,
Dofetilide Ki = 381 nM; isomer 8B, aD = +6.5°,
GlyT1 IC50 = 24 nM, Dofetilide Ki = 214 nM, isomer
8C, aD = À6.1°, GlyT1 IC50 = 31 nM, Dofetilide
10. Slassi, A.; Egle, I. Exp. Opin. Ther. Pat. 2004, 14, 201.
11. Lowe, J. A.; Drozda, S. E.; Fisher, K.; Strick, C.; Lebel,
L.; Schmidt, C.; Hiller, D.; Zandi, K. S. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 1291.
12. Howard, H. R., Jr.; Chenard, B. L.; Macor, J. E.; Shenk,
K. D.; Desai, K. A. US Patent 6,166,020, 2000, Chem.
Abs., 2000, 134, 56692.
13. Perrone, R.; Berardi, F.; Tortorella, V.; Govoni, S.;
Lograno, M. D.; Daniele, E. Eur. J. Med. Chem. Chim.
Ther. 1991, 26, 869.
14. Mutulis, F.; Yahorava, S.; Mutule, I.; Yahorau, A.;
Liepinsh, E.; Kopantshuk, S.; Veiksina, S.; Tars, K.;
Belyakov, S.; Mishnev, A.; Rinken, A.; Wikberg, J. E. S.
J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 4613.
Ki = 219 nM;
isomer
8D,
aD = À4.3°,
GlyT1
IC50 = 26 nM, Dofetilide Ki = 206 nM. Thus not
only does the GlyT1 affinity differ little between