P. V. Fish et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 2022–2025
2025
(c) Millard, R. J.; Moore, K.; Rencken, R.; Yalcin, I.;
Bump, R. C. BJU Int. 2004, 93, 311.
In summary, scaffold-hopping from piperazines 3 and 4
to the amino-pyrrolidine structure has delivered a series
of compounds with excellent dual serotonin and nor-
adrenaline reuptake inhibition and 100-fold selectivity
over dopamine reuptake inhibition. By determining
potency, selectivity, CYP2D6 inhibition and human
metabolic stability in parallel we were quickly able to
optimize the drug-like properties of the series. Example
12b was found to have a large selectivity window over
hERG channel activity, and showed greater than 200-
fold selectivity for 5-HT and NA activity over a wide
panel of receptors, enzymes and ion channels. This
investigation has also shown that small substitution
changes can have subtle effects on the ratio of 5-HT to
NA reuptake inhibition. This may prove useful in deter-
mining the optimal ratio of activities in a number of dis-
ease areas such as depression, neuropathic pain and
stress urinary incontinence. Further information on this
series, including pharmacokinetic and in vivo efficacy
data, will be reported in the near future.
6. (a) Fray, M. J.; Bish, G.; Brown, A. D.; Fish, P. V.; Stobie,
A.; Wakenhut, F.; Whitlock, G. A. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 2006, 16, 4345; (b) Fray, M. J.; Bish, G.; Fish, P. V.;
Stobie, A.; Wakenhut, F.; Whitlock, G. A. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 4349.
7. After we completed this series, researchers at Eli Lilly
independently published their own work in this area,
Beadle, C. D.; Cases-Thomas, M. J.; Clark, B. P.;
Gallagher, P. T.; Masters, J. J.; Timms, G. H.; Walter,
M. W.; Whatton, M. A.; Wood, V. A.; Gilmore, J.
WO2005000811.
8. The assays were a modification of those described by
Blakely, R. D.; Clark, J. A.; Rudnick, G.; Amara, S. G.
Anal. Biochem. 1991, 194, 302, HEK293 cells expressing a
single human amine transporter protein (7500 cells/well in
Millipore 96-well filter bottom plates) were pre-incubated
at 25 °C for 5 min with assay buffer containing vehicle
(DMSO in water) or test compound. Uptake of neuro-
transmitter into the cells was initiated by the addition of
tritiated 5-HT (50 nM), NA (200 nM) or DA (200 nM)
substrates, the samples were shaken in an incubator at
25 °C for 5 min (5-HT, DA) or 15 min (NA). The assays
were stopped by an ice-cold buffer wash followed by
filtration. The filters were then dried before measuring the
amount of radioactivity taken up into the cells by
scintillation counting. Potency of test compounds was
quantified as IC50 values, that is, concentration required to
inhibit the specific uptake of radiolabelled substrate into
the cells by 50% relative to maximum (vehicle only) over a
10-point dose–response range. A minimum of three
experiments were made.
Acknowledgments
We wish to thank Drs. Stephen Phillips and Donald
Newgreen and their teams (Discovery Biology Depart-
ment) for screening data, and Debbie Lovering, Edward
Pegden, Carol Bains and Kerry Paradowski for com-
pound synthesis. We are also grateful to Anthony Har-
rison, Nicola Lindsay and Ian Gurrell of the
pharmacokinetics and metabolism department for
ADME studies.
9. (a) Skinner, M. H.; Kuan, H.-Y.; Pan, A.; Sathirakul,
K.; Knadler, M. P.; Gonzales, C. R.; Yeo, K. P.;
Reddy, S.; Lim, M.; Ayan-Oshodi, M.; Wise, S. D. Clin.
Pharm. Ther. 2003, 73, 170; (b) Ereshefsky, L.; Riesen-
man, C.; Lam, Y. W. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 1995, 29(S1),
10.
References and notes
10. This is in contrast to the piperazine series described in Ref.
6, in which a 2-substituent delivers potent dual 5-HT and
NA reuptake inhibition.
11. The human hepatocyte assay was able to accurately
determine half-lives of up to 240 min, whereas the
maximum measurable half-life in human liver microsomes
was 120 min.
1. (a) Joffe, R. T.; Marshall, A. M.; Lee, D. K. J. Clin.
Psychiatry 1998, 59, 515; (b) Hellerstein, D. J.; Batchelder,
S. T.; Little, S. A. S.; Fedak, M. J.; Kreditor, D.;
Rosenthal, J. J. Clin. Psychiatry 1999, 60, 845.
2. Bauer, M.; Moeller, H.-J.; Schneider, E. Expert Opin.
Pharmacother. 2006, 7, 421.
3. Rowbotham, M. C.; Goli, V.; Kunz, N. R.; Lei, D. Pain
2004, 110, 697.
4. Wernicke, J. F.; Pritchett, Y. L.; D’Souza, D. N.;
Waninger, A.; Tran, P.; Iyengar, S.; Raskin, J. Neurology
2006, 67, 1411.
12. (a) Fermini, B.; Fossa, A. A. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2003, 2,
439; (b) Keating, M. T.; Sanguinetti, M. C. Cell 2001, 104,
569.
13. Finlayson, K.; Turnbull, L.; January, C. T.; Sharkey, J.;
Kelly, J. S. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2001, 430, 147.
5. (a) Moore, K. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2004, 86(S1), S53;
(b) Thor, K. B. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2004, 86(S1), S38;
14. Jamieson, C.; Moir, E. M.; Rankovic, Z.; Wishart, G.
J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 5029.