Friedel-Crafts alkylation.1b-d,5b,7 However, this method
demands an excess of Lewis acid and lacks flexibility for
variation of substituents. Alternatively, ring closure is
accomplished upon formation of the C-N bond via intramo-
lecular reductive amination.6a Intramolecular radical cycliza-
tion was successfully applied for the synthesis of the
7-membered ring in aphanorphine.1a,e Particularly useful for
the syntheses of natural compounds and analogues is the cor-
responding 3-benzazepinone structure, as alkylation allows
further introduction of substituents, for example, giving rise
to bridged structures.1c,d,8
Transition-metal-catalyzed reactions were also used for
generating the 3-benzazepine scaffold. Thus, the Heck
reaction of olefins proved to be high yielding and reliable.3a,b,6b,9
Though this approach regioselectively leads to 7-membered
rings, a problem with the geometry and location of the
resulting double bond still remains, due to the unselective
elimination of palladium-hydrogen species at the final step
of the Heck reaction.1e,3a,9a A regioselective synthesis of
4-substituted 3-benzazepinones via intramolecular hydro-
amidation of the triple bond incorporated in the noncyclic
precursor has also recently been reported.10a,b
ously 3-substituted 2-propynoic acids, deliver the substrates
3 for intramolecular cyclization. Due to the syn-addition to
the triple bond during Heck reaction, our strategy provides
exclusively compounds possessing the Z-conformation of the
exocyclic double bond.
Moreover, the regioselectivity of the Heck reaction and,
as a result, the ring size of the generated medium-sized ring,
is also determined by the mechanism of the reaction. As the
initially generated arylpalladium π-complex 4 is transformed
into a σ-vinyl palladium complex 5 via simultaneous syn-
addition to the triple bond, endocyclization via a hypothetical
intermediate 7 is fairly unlikely due to the high strain exerted
by the trans geometry around the double bond in the
8-membered ring. The Pd(0) catalyst is regenerated with a
reducing agent present in the reaction mixture.
Our first attempts to find optimal conditions for the
reductive Heck reaction (Table 1) were carried out with the
Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditionsa
We have elaborated a new pathway toward the synthesis
of 1-substituted 3-benzazepinones 6, based on a Heck
intramolecular reductive cyclization reaction (Scheme 1).
time
(h)
dilution yield
Scheme 1
entry
solvent (v/v)
catalyst
(mM)
(%)
1
2
3
12
12
3
DME/H2O (4:1) Pd(PPh3)4
DMF/H2O (3:1) Pd(PPh3)4
DMF/H2O (3:1) Pd(PPh3)4
170
170
70
70
70
60
67
80
81
79
4 (MW) 0.25 DMF/H2O (3:1) Pd(PPh3)4
5 (MW) 0.25 DMF/H2O (3:1) Pd(OAc)2 +
2Ph3P
6 (MW) 0.25 DMF/H2O (3:1) Hermann’s
70
81
palladacycle
a Reactions were run on a 0.4 mmol scale of 3a; for entries 1-3, the
mixture was heated at 100 °C (oil bath temperature) in a sealed vial; for
entries 4-6, MW irradiation at 110 °C and 300 W maximum power was
employed.
amide 3a, generated from the corresponding amine and
phenylpropiolic acid chloride. The reaction was run under
conventional heating in the presence of 3 mol % of Pd(PPh3)4
as the catalyst and sodium formate as the reducing agent.
The optimal solvent system for the cyclization was found to
be a DMF/water mixture. In the absence of water the reaction
failed, probably because of the ineffectiveness of the reducing
agent under anhydrous conditions.
Best yields for cyclization were found using high dilution
conditions. The structure of the obtained compound 6a was
fully confirmed with 2D-NMR spectroscopy. The Z-config-
uration of the resulting exocyclic double bond was assigned
on the basis of a NOE effect between the vinylic proton of
the double bond and the neighboring proton of the aryl ring.
Thus, having found appropriate conditions under conven-
tional heating for generating the medium-sized ring of model
compound 6a, we investigated the protocol applying micro-
The sequence starts with the readily available 2-bro-
mophenylethylamines 212a which, after coupling with vari-
(7) (a) Kawase, M.; Motohashi, N.; Niwa, M.; Nozaki, M. Heterocycles
1997, 45, 1121. (b) Weinstein, B.; Craig, A. R. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41,
875.
(8) Wirt, U.; Frohlich, R.; Wunsch, B. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005,
16, 2199.
(9) (a) Tietze, L.; Schimpf, R. Synthesis 1993, 876. (b) Tietze, L.;
Burkhardt, O.; Henrich, M. Liebigs Ann. 1997, 1407.
(10) (a) Yu, Y.; Stephenson, G. A.; Mitchell, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006,
47, 3811. (b) Tsubakiyama, M.; Sato, Y.; Mori, M. Heterocycles 2004, 64,
27.
(11) (a) Herrmann, W. A.; Brossmer, C.; Reisinger, C. P.; Riermeier,
T. H.; Ofele, K.; Beller, M. Chem. Eur. J. 1997, 3, 1357. (b) Herrmann,
W. A.; Brossmer, C.; Ofele, K.; Reisinger, C. P.; Priermeier, T.; Beller,
M.; Fischer, H. Angew. Chem. 1995, 107, 1989. (c) Herrmann, W. A.;
Brossmer, C.; Ofele, K.; Reisinger, C. P.; Priermeier, T.; Beller, M.; Fischer,
H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1995, 34, 1844.
3018
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 16, 2007