Organic Letters
Letter
(Scheme 1b). The main challenges associated with this reaction
are the selectivity between the two cleavable C−N bonds and
the site selectivity of the addition to the ketene (CC vs C
O).
The investigation started with N-tosyl-2-phenylaziridine 2a
and diphenyl ketene, both readily available.10 The strong
electrophilicity of ketenes prompted us to directly test its ability
to act as the activating agent of the aziridine: mixing aziridine 2a
with diphenyl ketene, however, did not lead to lactam 3a, the
aziridine being quantitatively recovered (Table 1, entry 1). The
enhance the yield of lactam, 76% with 20 mol % lithium iodide
and 45% with 10 mol % [reaction lasting 18 h instead of 2 h
(Table 1, entries 6 and 7)]. Different solvents such as diethyl
ether, dichloromethane, and toluene were also evaluated: minor
variations were observed, tetrahydrofuran and diethyl ether
being the best solvents, for both the yield and the selectivity.10
Ultimately, the best conditions were obtained when the reaction
was performed in tetrahydrofuran at room temperature using 0.8
equiv of lithium iodide, with slow addition of the ketene over 1 h
[83% isolated yield (Table 1, entry 8)].
As N-tosylaziridines are concomitantly generated with lithium
iodide by reacting an N-tosylimine with iodomethyllithium,15
a
Table 1. Influence of Additives on the Formal (3+2)
Cycloaddition
a
one-pot (2+1+2) reaction was an interesting alternative that
would allow the formation of a lactam directly from the
corresponding imines. This would not only provide a more
straightforward route to γ-lactams but also eliminate the
requirement to isolate the sometimes sensitive and potentially
toxic aziridines. To our delight, the addition of methyllithium to
a solution of diiodomethane and N-tosylimine 1a at −78 °C,
followed by a subsequent slow addition of 2 equiv of diphenyl
ketene at room temperature, afforded γ-lactam 3a in 88% yield,
which compared favorably with the 66% combined yield
obtained through the stepwise procedure (Scheme 2).
With these optimal conditions in hand for both the one-pot
(2+1+2) and the stepwise (3+2) formal cycloadditions, the
scope of the reaction was next explored. Interestingly, the two
methods appeared to be very complementary, the one-pot
(2+1+2) cycloaddition conditions being very effective from N-
tosylimines and the (3+2) conditions being essential when
alternative strategies are used to obtain the aziridines (Scheme
2).
The p-fluorophenyl- and p-bromophenyl-substituted azir-
idines 2b and 2c afforded lactams 3b and 3c, respectively, in very
good yields, with equal efficiency for the one-pot and stepwise
processes (Scheme 2). The next example was particularly
striking as it also highlighted the advantage of the one-pot
procedure over the stepwise protocol. Indeed, whereas p-
methoxyphenyl lactam 3d could be isolated in 75% in the one-
pot process, the two-step sequence was unfruitful due to the
inherent instability of aziridine 2d, which could not be isolated
in >25% yield. Another feature of the formal cycloaddition is the
rather limited electronic influence of the substituents at the
aromatic para position on the efficiency of the cycloaddition:
both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups
leading to high yields. The p-nitrophenyl group, however, led
to a significant decrease in the yield of lactam 3e (47%). This low
yield of the one-pot process is essentially due to the rather
inefficient formation of aziridine 2e, isolated in only 57% yield
from p-nitro imine 1e, the subsequent (3+2) cycloaddition
being very effective affording lactam 3e in 94% yield. The m-
fluoro-, m-bromo-, and m-methoxy-substituted phenyl deriva-
tives (1f−h) afforded γ-lactams 3f−h, respectively, in yields
ranging from 71% to 87%, with again slightly better yields for the
one-pot procedure. The o-tolyl lactam 3i and 1-naphthyl lactam
3j were obtained with equal efficiency, showing the compati-
bility of the cycloaddition with slightly more sterically
demanding mono ortho-substituted aryl derivatives. Furyl-
derived lactam 3k, however, was isolated in only 15% yield in
the one-pot sequence. This poor yield is again due to the
inefficient formation and instability of aziridine 2k, which in this
case could not be isolated from imine 1k.
b
c
entry
additive
equiv
conversion (%)
3a:4a ratio
1
2
3
4
5
none
LiCl
LiBr
LiI
nBu4NI
LiI
−
1
1
1
0
0
−
−
75:25
>95:5
75:25
>95:5
>95:5
60
98
80
76
45
100
1
d
6
7
0.2
0.1
0.8
d
LiI
LiI
8
>95:5 (88%)
a
Reaction conditions: diphenyl ketene (2.0 equiv, slow addition of
ketene over 1 h), aziridine 2a (1.0 equiv, 0.2 M), additive, THF, rt, 2
b
h. NMR measurement, on the crude mixture, based on the
c
d
transformation of aziridine 2a. Isolated yield in parentheses. In
this cases, the second equivalent of ketene was added after reaction for
8 h; the total reaction time was 18 h.
Lewis acid activation of aziridines into 1,3-heterodipoles by
selective cleavage of the C−N bond is well documented.11 We
thus tested a wide variety of Lewis acids such as boron
trifluoride,11a scandium triflate,11b copper triflate,11c zinc
bromide,11d and nickel iodide,11e but in combination with
ketene, all failed to produce any detectable amounts of lactam,
affording only ketene dimers and aziridine ring-opened and
unidentified side products.10 The ring opening of the aziridine in
the presence of carbon dioxide has also been reported to be
triggered by first-row metal-halide.12 We thus decided to test
lithium halides as the co-activator, which turned out to be much
more rewarding. While the addition of lithium chloride left the
starting aziridine untouched (Table 1, entry 2), the use of
lithium bromide led, for the first time, to the formation of two
cycloaddition products: desired lactam 3a, resulting from the
ring opening at C-2, and oxazolidine 4a, resulting from the
opening of the aziridine at the less hindered C-3 (Table 1, entry
3).16 Eventually, lithium iodide rewardingly afforded γ-lactam 3a
with complete conversion of the aziridine and only traces of
oxazolidine 4a (Table 1, entry 4).14 Changing lithium to
tetrabutylammonium led to incomplete conversion, and less
repeatable reactions, producing the lactam and the oxazolidine
in a 75/25 ratio (Table 1, entry 5). A substoichiometric amount
of lithium iodide was also sufficient to effectively promote the
reaction (Table 1, entries 6 and 7). However, at 20 mol %, the
reaction became much slower, most probably favoring ketene
dimerization, thus decreasing the level of formation of the
lactam; introducing the ketene in two portions allowed to
To further test the scope of the reaction, non-aryl-substituted
aziridines were next engaged. Hence, cinnamyl lactam 3l was
2450
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 2449−2454