Scheme 1. Proposed Radical-Polar Crossover Reaction
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Weinreb Amide 6 and Vinyl Iodide
10
species capable of generating an aryl radical (“In•”) would
cause a 5-exo-trig radical cyclization to occur. The regio-
chemistry of this process would be governed by the polarity
of the enone acceptor, and the bulky silyloxy group would
presumably direct the aryl radical to the opposite face of
the alkene. Then, reaction of the resultant R-keto radical with
an organometallic reagent capable of undergoing homolytic
cleavage (“M-R”) should create an enolate. If a suitable
oxidant (“O-X”) were present in the mixture, this enolate
would be hydroxylated, providing spirocyclic R-hydroxy
ketone 3. We hypothesized that the aryl hydrogen would
shield the re face of the enolate, delivering the desired isomer
of 3. Thus, we envisioned installing a ring, an alcohol, and
two stereocenters including a quaternary carbon in a single
step. An isolated report from Kunz of a tandem radical
conjugate addition-enolate hydroxylation11 served as en-
couraging precedent. However, successful reactions in this
prior study were limited to additions of methyl radicals
generated from Me2AlCl. We required a process that would
permit use of an aryl radical in the addition step. Moreover,
we were concerned about the potential lability of the allylic
chloride of 2 in the presence of radicals.
Cyclization substrate 2 was constructed via a convergent
route featuring the union of aryl and cyclopentene subunits.
The requisite coupling partners were synthesized as outlined
in Scheme 2. Wittig homologation of known aldehyde 44b
afforded aldehyde 5. Oxidation and subsequent amidation
provided Weinreb amide 6. Silylation of enantiopure alcohol
712 followed by pivaloate cleavage delivered alcohol 8, which
was transformed into enone 9 by oxidation and iodination.13
Then, Luche reduction14 and silylation afforded vinyl iodide
10, in which the two alcohol moieties are differentially
protected.
The vinyl Grignard reagent derived from 10 (prepared
according to Knochel’s procedure)15 was added to Weinreb
amide 6, affording enone 11 (Scheme 3). Notably, the aryl
iodide was unaffected by this reaction. We were pleased to
find that 11 could be reduced in diastereoselective fashion
by the Corey-Bakshi-Shibata catalyst (CBS cat.).16 Iden-
tification of the optimal reaction temperature (10 °C), time
(e4 h), and ratio of reactants (11/CBS cat./BH3‚THF ) 1:0.2:
1.2) proved critical to obtaining reproducibly high yields and
diastereomeric ratios. The stereochemistry at the hydroxyl-
bearing carbon was established by Mosher ester analysis.17
Then, SN2 chlorination of the allylic alcohol of 12 was
accomplished with methanesulfonyl chloride and triethy-
lamine.18 The TES group of 13 could be selectively cleaved
in the presence of the TBS moiety, and oxidation of the
resultant alcohol provided enone 2.
The results of our investigation of the radical-polar
crossover reaction of 2 are summarized in Table 1. Hexa-
butylditin was employed to generate an aryl radical from 2
under nonreducing conditions. We discovered that Et3Al19
was more effective at mediating the radical-polar crossover
step than Et2Zn20 or Et3B21 (cf. entry 6 vs entries 1 and 3 or
entry 7 vs entries 2 and 4). Both O222 and dimethyldioxirane
(15) (a) Krasovskiy, A.; Knochel, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43,
3333. (b) Ren, H.; Krasovskiy, A.; Knochel, P. Chem. Commun. 2005, 543.
(c) Krasovskiy, A.; Straub, B. F.; Knochel, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006,
45, 159.
(16) Corey, E. J.; Helal, C. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1986.
(17) (a) Dale, J. A.; Mosher, H. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 512. (b)
Ohtani, I.; Kusumi, T.; Kashman, Y.; Kakisawa, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991,
113, 4092.
(18) Artman, G. D., III; Grubbs, A. W.; Williams, R. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2007, 129, 6336.
(19) Liu, J.-Y.; Jang, Y.-J.; Lin, W.-W.; Liu, J.-T.; Yao, C.-F. J. Org.
Chem. 2003, 68, 4030.
(9) For reviews, see: (a) Srikanth, G. S. C.; Castle, S. L. Tetrahedron
2005, 61, 10377. (b) Zhang, W. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 7237.
(10) For a review, see: Chen, B.-C.; Zhou, P.; Davis, F. A.; Ciganek,
E. Org. React. (N.Y.) 2003, 62, 1.
(11) Ru¨ck, K.; Kunz, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 694.
(12) Myers, A. G.; Hammond, M.; Wu, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37,
3083.
(13) Johnson, C. R.; Harikrishnan, L. S.; Golebiowski, A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1994, 35, 7735.
(14) Gemal, A. L.; Luche, J.-L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 5454.
4034
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 20, 2007