J IRAN CHEM SOC
Scheme 1 Synthesis of tetrahydrobenzimidazo[2,1-b]quinazolin-1(2H)-one derivatives catalyzed by [H-Suc]HSO4
3,3‑dimethyl‑12‑(4‑cyano‑phenyl)‑3,4,5,12‑tetrahydrobe
nzimidazo[2,1‑b]quinazolin‑1(2H)‑one (N1):
1‑((benzo[d]thiazol‑2‑ylamino)(pyridin‑2‑yl)methyl)
naphthalen‑2‑ol (O2)
1
FT-IR (neat) ν = 3425, 3045, 2962, 2227,1567, 1448,1358,
1264, 748 cm−1; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz): δ = 0.92
(3H, s, CH3), 1.07 (3H, s,CH3), 2.07 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz),
2.28 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz), 2.67–2.69 (2H, m), 6.56 (1H,
s), 6.98 (1H, td, J1 = 8.0 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz), 7.08 (1H,
td, J1 = 8.2 Hz, J2 = 0.8 Hz), 7.41 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz),
7.24 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.54 (2H, dd, J1 = 5.0 Hz,
J2 = 1.6 Hz), 7.75 (2H, dd, J1 = 5.0 Hz, J2 = 1.6 Hz),
11.26 (1H, s, NH) ppm. 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100 Mz):
Sample solubility was too low for 13C NMR.
FT-IR (neat) ν = 3310, 1599, 1545, 1510, 1449 cm−1; H
NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz): δ = 7.00 (s, 1H), 7.02–7.80
(m, 15H), 8.80 (s, 1H), 10.28 (br, 1H) ppm; 13C NMR
(DMSO-d6, 100 MHz): δ = 21.7, 119.3, 121.4, 121.4,
122.9, 123.7, 123.7, 125.9, 126.0, 126.8, 126.9, 127.1,
127.4, 127.5, 128.4, 128.5, 129.1, 130.0, 131.2, 132.6,
137.5, 143.0, 152.6, 153.6, 166.8 ppm.
Results and discussion
3,3‑dimethyl‑12‑(2‑naphthyl)‑3,4,5,12‑tetrahyd‑
robenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1‑b]quinazolin‑1(2H)‑one (P1)
Very recently and in continuation of our previous reports on
the preparation and use of ionic liquids in different types of
ration of succinimidinium hydrogen sulfate ([H-Suc]HSO4)
and its applicability in the acceleration of the N-Boc protection
of amines. On the basis of these results we were interested in
investigating the applicability of [H-Suc]HSO4 in the accelera-
tion of the synthesis of some of the heterocyclic compounds.
Tetrahydrobenzimidazo[2,1-b]quinazolin-1(2H)-ones,
one of the most important class of quinazolines, are very
interesting heterocycles as they serve as building blocks in
numerous natural and synthetic products that exhibit a wide
spectrum of biological and pharmacological activities.
Because of these important activities various types of cata-
lysts were used for the promotion of the synthesis of these
compounds via the three-component reaction between an
aldehyde, 2-aminobenzimidazole and dimedone (5,5-dime-
thyl-1,3-cyclohexanedione) [24–27]. Although these
methods are useful, but introduction of more efficient
and green catalysts for the promotion of the preparation
of tetrahydrobenzimidazo[2,1-b]quinazolin-1(2H)-one is
under considerable attention yet.
FT-IR (neat) ν = 3443, 3050, 2964,1575, 1370, 1261,
746 cm−1; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz): δ = 0.94 (3H,
s, CH3), 1.08 (3H, s, CH3), 2.04 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz), 2.29
(1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz), 2.67- 274 (2H, m), 6.60 (1H, s), 6.93
(1H, t, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.03 (1H, t, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.31 (2H,
m), 7.38 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.49 (2H, m), 7.80 (2H, t,
J = 7.6 Hz), 7.92 (1H, d, J = 7.6), 8.04 (1H, s), 11.19 (1H,
s, NH) ppm; 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100 Mz): sample solu-
bility was too low for 13C NMR.
12‑(2‑fluorenyl)‑3,3‑dimethyl‑3,4,5,12‑tetrahyd‑
robenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1‑b]quinazolin‑1(2H)‑one (Q1)
FT-IR (neat) ν = 3431, 3047, 3229, 2908, 1575, 1372,
1264, 741 cm-1; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz): δ = 0.96
(3H, s, CH3), 1.08 (3H, s, CH3), 2.07 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz),
2.28 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz), 2.65–2.69 (2H, m), 3.85 (2H, s,
CH2), 6.50 (1H, s), 6.96 (1H, td, J1 = 7.2 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz),
7.05 (1H, td, J1 = 7.2 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz), 7.28 (1H, td,
J1 = 7.2 Hz, J2 = 1.2 Hz), 7.31 (2H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.38
(2H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.54 (1H, d, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.54 (1H, s),
7.78 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.81 (1H, d, J = 7.2 Hz), 11.1
(1H, s, NH) ppm; 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 100 Mz): sample
solubility was too low for 13C NMR.
To optimize the amount of the catalyst and the reaction
temperature in the synthesis of tetrahydrobenzimidazo[2,1-
b]quinazolin-1(2H)-ones, the condensation of 2-aminoben-
zimidazole, benzaldehyde and dimedone under thermal
solvent-free conditions was selected as a model reaction.
1 3