Formation of a Phosphine-Phosphinate Ligand
doublets of doublets of doublets due to cis- and trans-4
(Scheme 1, Figure 2, and Tables S1 and S2); these species
were readily identified because the cis/trans ratio was now
1:4. Benzene was again formed over the 10 h reaction time.
The 31P{1H} assignments are consistent with literature data:
formation of the five-membered ring and the electron-
withdrawing effect of the O atom bound to Pγ (in cis-4) and
PC (in trans-4) atoms result in the very low-field signals for
these P atoms,11 while the large JPRPâ and JPAPC coupling
constants define the mutually trans positions of these P atoms,
and the 1JRhP values are in the normal range.12 The 1H NMR
signals in CD3OD for the inequivalent methylene protons
of the reactant THP within cis- and trans-4 in CD3OD appear
as a multiplet in the range δ 3.07-4.18 (similar to the
corresponding data for the PPh3 system, Table S1). Some
isolated yellow crystals were well characterized as an
isomeric mixture by elemental analysis, NMR spectroscopy,
and MS data; the 31P{1H} NMR spectra of the crystals
dissolved in CD3OD and of the in situ solution reveal (as
for the PPh3 system) that the isomer ratio was unchanged
from 298 to 213 K.
homogeneous hydroformylation and hydrogenation condi-
tions, where such cleavage is critical in determining catalytic
activity.13 Of note, reaction of 1 with THP generates RhCl-
(THP)4 and no P-C bond cleavage is seen.1
Reports on cleavage of a P-C bond concurrent with
formation of a P-O bond are rare. A close analogue of our
system is seen in work from Pringle’s group,10b which
reported P-C bond cleavage at PtII and PdII centers during
studies on metal complex-catalyzed addition of PH3 to
formaldehyde to give THP: [M{P,P-(HOCH2)2POCH2P(CH2-
OH)2}2]Cl2 complexes were isolated as a cis/trans mixture
from reaction of cis-MCl2(THP)2 (M ) Pt, Pd) with excess
THP in methanol. Analogous to our Rh systems, a phos-
phine-phosphinite ligand has been formed, but in contrast
to the Rh species, the substituents at each P atom are
hydroxymethyl; the Pt and Pd complexes were well char-
acterized but not crystallographically. A complicated mul-
tistep mechanism was presented and involved initial forma-
tion of a binuclear metal alkoxide derived from deprotonation
of a coordinated P(CH2OH)3 and a final ring closure by
nucleophilic attack of a coordinated PCH2O- moiety at a
second (mutually cis) coordinated P atom; the proton was
incorporated into a phosphonium species, while in our work
the proton becomes a component of a hydrocarbon product.
A similar proton loss from the THP and ring closure by
nucleophilic attack at a cis-PRR2′ moiety is likely the
essential mechanism in our Rh systems; none of the
commonly proposed mechanisms for metal-catalyzed P-C
bond cleavage (oxidative insertion of a low-valent metal into
the aryl- and alkyl-phosphorus bonds, electrophilic sub-
stitution, and o-metalation processes)14,15 seems appropriate
for the Rh systems. A related example from Pregosin’s
group16 is P-C bond cleavage of a OTf-RuII-P(OH)Ph2
moiety induced by external MeOH to form a species
containing the Ph-RuII-P(OH)(OMe)Ph moiety with HOTf
as co-product; here the MeOH proton removes coordinated
triflate which is replaced by a Ph of the phosphine and the
methoxide replaces the phosphine phenyl. Less germane
examples of P-C bond cleavage within a coordinated PPh3
with co-formation of a P-O bond include that of an IrIII
system, the cleavage being induced by a carbonyl oxygen
of a coordinated dibenzoylmethylene moiety,17 and that of
a PdII system, where an acetate ligand provides the oxygen
source.18 We are unaware of any reports of cleavage of an
aryl-phosphine P-C bond induced by a -CH2OH func-
tionality, with co-formation of a hydrocarbon. More common
for coordinated THP is loss of formaldehyde with formation
2
2
The reactivity of 1 with PEtPh2, PMePh2, P(p-tol)3, P(p-
F-C6H4)3, and PnPr3 was qualitatively the same as that
described for the PPh3 and PCyPh2 systems: in situ reactions
revealed P-C bond cleavage with formation of cis- and
trans-RhCl(PRR′2)[P,P-R′(R)POCH2P(CH2OH)2] in a ratio
of ∼1, with concomitant generation of the hydrocarbon:
benzene for the first two systems and then, respectively,
1
toluene, fluorobenzene, and propane. The 31P{1H} and H
NMR data for the cis and trans isomer products, using the
labeling of Figure 2, are summarized in Tables S1 and S2.
Further evidence for an intermediate such as 2 (seen with
PPh3, Scheme 1) was seen only in the P(p-F-C6H4)3 system,
where cis-RhCl(P(p-F-C6H4)3)2(THP) was detected: δP
20.00 (ddd, Pa(THP), JPaRh ) 130.9, JPaPb ) 324.0, JPaPc
40.7), 33.78 (ddd, Pb(p-F-C6H4)3 trans to THP, JPbRh
)
)
142.9, JPbPa ) 324.0, JPbPc ) 38.0), and 49.06 (ddd, Pc(p-
F-C6H4)3 trans to Cl, JPcRh ) 192.5, JPcPa ) 40.7, JPcPb
)
38.0). The aryl-containing phosphine systems took ∼12 h
to generate the equilibrium isomer mixture, while the PnPr3
system was noticeably slower (>1 day); this is consistent
with more general facile, metal-catalyzed cleavage of P-aryl
bonds versus P-alkyl bonds, at least as substantiated under
(11) (a) Hoge, B.; Tho¨sen, C.; Pantenburg, I. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 9019.
(b) Artyushin, O.; Odinets, I.; Goryunov, E.; Fedyanin, I.; Lyssenko,
K.; Mastryukova, T.; Ro¨schenthaler, G.-V.; Ke´gl, T.; Keglevich, G.;
Kolla´r, L. J. Organomet. Chem. 2006, 691, 5547. (c) Kim, Y.; Verkade,
J. G. J. Organometal. Chem. 2003, 669, 32. (d) Arena, C. G.; Faraone,
F.; Graiff, C.; Tiripicchio, A. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 711. (e)
Nifantyev, E. E; Koroteev, M. P.; Koroteev, A. M.; Belsky, V. K.;
Stash, A. I.; Antipin, M. Y.; Lysenko, K. A.; Cao, L. J. Organomet.
Chem. 1999, 587, 18. (f) Bergamini, P.; Costa, E.; Orpen, A G.;
Pringle, P. G.; Smith, M. B. Organometallics 1995, 14, 3178. (g) Li,
Y. W.; Newton, M. G.; King, R. B. J. Organomet. Chem. 1995, 488,
63. (h) Grim, S. O.; Briggs, W. L.; Barth, R. C.; Tolman, C. A.; Jesson,
J. P. Inorg. Chem. 1974, 13, 1095. (i) Allison, D. A.; Clardy, J.;
Verkade, J. G. Inorg. Chem. 1972, 11, 2804.
(12) (a) Cipot, J.; McDonald, R.; Ferguson, M. J.; Schatte, G.; Stradiotto,
M. Organometallics 2007, 26, 594. (b) Han, Li-B.; Tilley, T. D. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 13698. (c) Marcazzan, P.; Patrick, B. O.;
James, B. R. Organometallics 2005, 24, 1445. (d) Raebiger, J. W.;
Dubois, D. L. Organometallics 2005, 24, 110. (e) Merckle, C.; Blu¨mel,
J. Top. Catal. 2005, 34, 5.
(13) (a) Garrou, P. E. Chem. ReV. 1985, 85, 171. (b) Sakakura, T.;
Kobayashi, T.-A.; Hayashi, T.; Kawabata, Y.; Tanaka, M.; Ogata, I.
J. Organomet. Chem. 1984, 267, 171.
(14) Kikukawa, K.; Yamane, T.; Ohbe, Y.; Takagi M.; Matsuda, T. Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1979, 52, 1187.
(15) (a) Dubois, R. A.; Garrou, P. E.; Lavin, K. D.; Allcock, H. R.
Organometallics 1984, 3, 649. (b) Goel, A. B. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1984,
84, L25. (c) Braterman, P. S.; Cross, R. J.; Young, G. B. J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans. 1976, 1310.
(16) Geldbach, T. J.; Drago, D.; Pregosin, P. S. Chem. Comm. 2000, 1629.
(17) Cowie, M.; Gauthier, M. D.; Loeb, S. J.; McKeer, I. R. Organome-
tallics 1983, 2, 1057.
(18) Kikukawa, K.; Matsuda, T. J. Organomet. Chem. 1982, 235, 243.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 46, No. 21, 2007 9001