C-H activation, coupling, and carbopalladium cyclization.
In this process, more than one carbon-carbon bond can be
formed, and polycyclic aromatic rings can also be constructed
in a one-pot manner.
Table 1. Tandem C-H Activation/Biscyclization Reaction of
Propargylic Compounds with Terminal Alkynesa
We initially focused on palladium-catalyzed cyclization/
coupling reaction of propargylic carbonate 1a and pheny-
lacetylene (2a) to synthesize the highly substituted indene 4
(Scheme 1).4,5 Surprisingly, when compound 1a was treated
Scheme 1
with 2a at 60 °C in DMF in the presence of Pd(PPh3)4 (5
mol %) and CuI (10 mol %), using Et3N as a base, the 2,3-
disubstituted indene 4 was isolated in only 6% yield, and an
unexpected diethyl 5-benzyl 11H-benzo[b]fluorene-11,11-
dicarboxylate (3aa) was obtained as a major product. The
formation of polycyclic compound 3aa shows that this
tandem reaction involved a novel C-H activation process
in which three carbon-carbon bonds and two carbocycles
were constructed. This result encouraged us to extend our
protocol to investigate this novel C-H activation reaction.
Consequently, we investigated the tandem cyclization reac-
tion of 1a and 2a under various conditions.6 Pd(PPh3)4/CuI
and Pd(OAc)2/PPh3/CuI proved to be the best catalysts. Pd2-
(dba)3·CHCl3/CuI were less effective. DMF turned out to be
a better solvent than THF and dioxane. As a base, Et3N gave
the best result. It is noteworthy that the reaction in the
absence of CuI resulted in a dramatic decrease in the yield
of 3aa.
To evaluate the scope of this C-H activation process, a
number of different substrates were examined (Table 1). The
reaction of 1a with various substituted terminal alkynes often
led to good yields of the polycyclic carbocycles (entries
1-5). The use of tetrahydropyranyl propargyl ether (2f) gave
the desired product in 67% yield (entry 6). Secondary
carbonates 1b-e possessing various substituents at the
propargylic position also worked well to give the desired
products in good to excellent yields (entries 7-10). Prop-
argylic carbonate 1f with different electron-withdrawing
groups also afforded the desired product 3fa in 30% yield
(entry 11). Propargylic acetate 1g has also proven successful
a Reaction conditions: 1 (1.0 equiv), 2 (2.0 equiv), Et3N (5.0 equiv),
Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol %), PPh3 (10 mol %), and CuI (10 mol %), in DMF, at
60 °C. b Isolated yield.
and gave a similar yield to 1a (entry 12). To our delight,
propargylic tertiary acetates 1h and 1i also afforded the
products 3ha and 3ia in moderate yields after longer reaction
times, perhaps due to steric hindrance (entries 13 and 14).7
In addition, a secondary propargyl acetate bearing a het-
eroaromatic substituent such as a furyl group also proceeded
well in this tandem reaction (entry 15).
Although the NMR spectroscopic data support the forma-
tion of polycyclic compounds 3, the structure was unambigu-
ously confirmed through an X-ray crystal structure analysis
of compound 3ca (Figure 1).8
(7) For propargylic tertiary carbonate, the nucleophile is inhibited from
attacking the 3-position of the indene; see ref 4a.
(4) (a) Duan, X.-H.; Guo, L.-N.; Bi, H.-P.; Liu, X.-Y.; Liang, Y.-M.
Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5777. (b) Guo, L.-N.; Duan, X.-H.; Bi, H.-P.; Liu, X.-
Y.; Liang, Y.-M. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 1538.
(5) For the coupling reaction of propargylic compounds and terminal
alkynes, see: (a) Mandai, T.; Nakata, T.; Murayama, H.; Yamaoki, H.;
Ogawa, M.; Kawada, M.; Tsuji, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 7179. (b)
Mandai, T.; Murayama, H.; Nakata, T.; Yamaoki, H.; Ogawa, M.; Kawada,
M.; Tsuji, J. J. Organomet. Chem. 1991, 417, 305. (c) Hayashi, M.; Saigo,
K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 6241. (d) Yoshida, M.; Hayashi, M.;
Shishido, K. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1643.
(8) Crystal data for 3ca have been deposited in CCDC as deposition
number 658187: C30H25ClO4, MW ) 484.14, T ) 294(2) K, λ ) 0.71073
Å, triclinic space group, P1, a ) 11.9038(10) Å, b ) 14.2082(12) Å, c )
16.4475(13) Å, R ) 73.5420(10)°, â ) 80.3940(10)°, γ ) 87.3350(10)°,
V ) 2630.4(4) Å3, Z ) 2, Dc ) 1.279 mg/m3, µ ) 0.182 mm-1, F(000) )
1062, crystal size 0.26 × 0.24 × 0.22 mm, independent reflections 9585
[R(int) ) 0.0274], reflections collected 13757, refinement method, full-
matrix least-squares on F2, goodness-of-fit on F2 1.555, final R indices [I
> 2σ(I)] R1 ) 0.1194, wR2 ) 0.0927, R indices (all date) R1 ) 0.0651,
wR2 ) 0.0833, extinction coefficient 0.0043(2), largest diff peak and hole
(6) Detailed results are listed in the Supporting Information.
0.641 and -0.548 e Å-3
.
5426
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 26, 2007