980
H. Tang et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 979–982
Table 1
In vitro antifungal activity MIC80 (l
g/ml)a
Compound
C. alb.
C. neo.
T. rub
M. gyp
A. fum
5a
5b
6a
6b
7a
8a
8b
9a
>64
>64
>64
64
>64
16
>64
32
16
16
32
>64
>64
4
8
16
8
>64
64
>64
>64
>64
32
16
16
8
>64
>64
>64
4
>64
8
16
4
4
>64
>64
>64
>64
>64
64
32
8
32
Figure 2. Chemical structures of the target compounds.
tetrahydroisoquinoline scaffold is smaller in the active site than
that of lansterol, the possible increase of affinity with CYP51 and
antifungal activities of target compounds is expected by expanding
the tetrahydroisoquinoline scaffold of lead molecules. On the basis
of the above hypothesis, the novel pyrazino [2,1-a] isoquinolin
derivatives were designed (Fig. 2), and their antifungal activities
in vitro were evaluated.
The chemical synthesis of pyrazino [2,1-a] isoquinolin deriva-
tives was outlined in Scheme 1. As a key intermediate of our de-
signed compounds, 4a–4b was synthesized respectively
according to the paper.11,12 Intermediate 4a–4b was allowed to re-
act with different alkyl halides in the presence of potassium car-
bonate in ethanol at 80 °C, and then the hydrogen chloride gas
was added to form compounds 5a–5b, 8a–8b, 11a–11b, and
14a–14b. Reduction of 5a–5b, 8a–8b, 11a–11b, and 14a–14b with
lithium aluminum hydride in THF yields the target compounds 6a–
6b, 9a–9b, 12a–12b, and 15a–15b. Cleavage of the methoxy groups
of 6a, 9a, 12a, 15a in HBr/CH3COOH provided N-substituted-
1,2,3,6,7,11b-hexahydro-4H-pyrazino [2,1-a] isoquinoline-9,10-
diol hydrobromide 7a, 10a, 13a, 16a. All the target compounds
were obtained as racemates.
The in vitro minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC80) of the
compounds were determined by the micro-broth dilution method
in 96-well microtest plates according to the methods defined by
the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards
(NCCLS).13 The tested fungi species included five pathogenic fungi,
which were found in dermatomycoses (Trichophyton rubrum, and
Microsporum gypseum) and systemic mycoses (Candida albicans,
Cryptococcus neoformans, and Aspergillus fumigatus). The in vitro
antifungal activities of all the title compounds were listed in
Table 1, in which fluconazole and L-6 were used as the controls.
In general, all the target compounds showed potent activities
9b
4
10a
11a
11b
12a
12b
13a
14a
14b
15a
15b
16a
L-6
FCZ
16
64
32
32
8
8
>64
>64
>64
>64
64
2
4
2
4
4
4
32
>64
16
64
16
16
4
16
32
4
8
8
32
2
0.5
2
2
8
64
64
32
4
16
16
2
64
32
16
8
16
64
>64
32
>64
>64
64
8
>64
64
>64
64
16
32
32
64
2
64
>64
a
Abbreviations: C. alb., Candida albicans; C. neo., Cryptococcus neoformans; T. rub.,
Trichophyton rubrum; M. gyp., Microsporum gypseum; A. fum., Aspergillus fumigatus;
FCZ: Fluconazole.
against most the test fungal pathogens. The MIC80 values indicated
that the compounds 8a, 9a, 9b, 11b, 12a–12b, and 13a showed
more excellent antifungal activities against four pathogenic fungi
than that of L-6. Noticeably, the MIC80 value of compounds 11b,
12a and 12b showed higher activities against nearly all the test
fungi except Candida albicans than that of fluconazole. Cryptococcus
neoformans has a worldwide distribution and is the most common
cause of life-threatening fungal infections. Compounds 7a, 9b, 10a,
11a–11b, and 13a exhibited comparable or stronger inhibitory
activities against Cryptococcus neoformans than fluconazole. Fluco-
nazole is not effective against Aspergillus fumigatus, while most of
our compounds showed potent activities. For example, the MIC80
values of compounds 9a and 12a against Aspergillus fumigatus are
8
lg/mL. On the Trichophyton rubrum strains, compound 9b, 11b,
12a–12b, and 13a showed better activities than fluconazole. On
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the target compounds 5a–16a. Reagents and conditions: (a) chloroacetyl chloride, NaHCO3, CH2Cl2; room temperature; (b) 2,2-dimethoxyethanamine
toluene, reflux; (c) H2SO4, CH2Cl2; (d) RX, K2CO3/KI; (e) LiAlH4, THF; (f) HBr/CH3COOH reflux.