of the nano-RuSe2 towards reduction of nitro-containing
aromatics was found to be efficient (quantitative isolated yield
for 10a and 10f) and chemoselective.
This work was supported by The University of Hong Kong
and the University Grants Council of HKSAR (the Area of
Excellence Scheme: AoE/P-03/08). KHL is partially supported
by a grant from The Committee on Research and Conference
Grants, HKU (small project funding 2010).
Notes and references
z Reactions of Ru3(CO)12 with 2-methylthiophenol, 3-methylthio-
phenol, 4-methylthiophenol, 4-ethylthiophenol, 3,4-dimethylthiophenol,
2,4,6-trimethylthiophenol, and dodecahexanethiol did not produce
polycrystalline homoleptic polymeric solid. Representative experimental:
[Ru(SePh)3]n 4. Diphenyl diselenide (0.156 g, 0.5 mmol) was added to a
solution of NaOH (0.03 g, 0.75 mmol) in water (10 mL), and a solution
of NaBH4 (0.0285 g, 0.75 mmol) in methanol (10 mL) was added. The
yellow suspension was heated until a clear solution was obtained.
After cooling to room temperature, the solution was adjusted to pH E
5–6 by dropwise addition of concentrated hydrochloric acid (12 M).
Ru(acac)3 (0.133 g, 0.33 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture
was refluxed for 12 h. The insoluble dark green precipitate was filtered
and washed with methanol (3 ꢁ 10 mL) and diethyl ether (10 mL). The
resultant dark green solid was placed in a vacuum oven (5 mmHg,
40 1C) for 12 h. Yields: 85% (0.16 g). Elemental analysis calcd (%):
C 37.96, H 2.64; found: C 37.22, H 2.65.
Scheme 1 (i) 10 equiv. NH2NH2ꢂH2O, 1 mol% nano-RuSe2, ethanol
reflux. Reaction time is indicated for each substrate. Conversion yields
are reported based on 1H-NMR determination. Isolated yields in
parentheses were obtained by column chromatography.
nano-RuSe2 in refluxing ethanol gave 10a in quantitative yield
within 24 h. Replacing the hydroxymethyl group with an
electron-donating group such as n-propyl group (9b) or hydroxyl
group (9c) resulted in a drop of substrate conversion (38% and
20% respectively) as monitored by 1H-NMR. Bromoaryl
compounds are readily de-brominated in catalytic reduction
but in our catalytic system, 9d was reduced into 10d in 100%
conversion and was isolated in 64% yield together with
N-arylation product. In contrast, reduction of 9d using mild
reducing agent NaBH4 and using heterogeneous Pd(0)/C as
catalyst was reported to give aniline.15 O-Benzyl is a common
protecting group for alcohols and phenols. Avoiding the
removal of this protecting group is difficult if the nitro-
containing substrate is reduced by using heterogeneous Pd
catalyst such as 10% Pd(0)/C or Pd(0)EnCatt 30NP nano-
particulate.16 Reduction of 9e with nano-RuSe2 catalyst
showed 42% substrate conversion with the product 10e
obtained in 40% isolated yield. We also examined the reduction
of dinitro aromatics like 9f as controlling the reduction of one
nitro group in dinitro compounds was difficult.18 The mono
reduced compound 10f was achieved with a 100% substrate
conversion and a 70% isolated yield. Electron-deficient
substrate 9g with a nitrile group ortho to the nitro group
was reduced under high pressure (50 psi) with heterogeneous
Pd(0) catalyst.17 By using nano-RuSe2 catalyst, 10g was obtained
in 100% isolated yield within 25 h. Chemoselectivity was also
observed in the case of 9h as only the nitro group ortho to the
phenolic OH was reduced and the nitro group para to the OH
group remained intact. Noteworthily, 9h could be reduced into
1,3-diaminophenol without any selectivity by formic acid in
the presence of 10% Pd(0)/C.19
1 N. L. Rosi, J. Eckert, M. Eddaoudi, D. T. Vodak, J. Kim,
M. O’Keeffe and O. M. Yaghi, Science, 2003, 300, 1127.
2 G. J. Halder, C. J. Kepert, B. Moubaraki, K. S. Murray and
J. D. Cashion, Science, 2002, 298, 1762.
3 A. Corma, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 2373; B. Kesanli and W. Lin,
Coord. Chem. Rev., 2003, 246, 305.
4 C.-M. Che, C.-H. Li, S. S.-Y. Chui, V. A. L. Roy and K.-H. Low,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2008, 14, 2965; K.-H. Low, V. A. L. Roy,
S. S.-Y. Chui, S. L.-F. Chan and C.-M. Che, Chem. Commun.,
2010, 46, 7328.
5 K.-H. Low, C.-H. Li, V. A. L. Roy, S. S.-Y. Chui, S. L.-F. Chan
and C.-M. Che, Chem. Sci., 2010, 1, 515.
6 I. E. Anderson, A. J. Breeze, J. D. Olson, L. Yang, Y. Sahoo and
S. A. Carter, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2009, 94, 063101.
7 X. Dong, C. M. Lau, A. Lohani, S. G. Mhaisalkar, J. Kasim,
Z. Shen, X. Ho, J. A. Rogers and L.-J. Li, Adv. Mater., 2008,
20, 2389.
8 Y. Feng, A. Gago, L. Timperman and N. Alonso-Vante,
Electrochim. Acta, 2010, 56, 1009.
9 F. J. Vidal-Iglesias, J. Solla-Gullo
J. M. Feliu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 6998.
10 U. Berger and J. Strahle, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 1984, 516, 19;
´
n, E. Herrero, A. Aldaz and
¨
U. Berger and J. Strahle, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 1985, 120, 389.
¨
11 B. F. G. Johnson, R. D. Johnston, P. L. Josty, J. Lewis and
I. G. Williams, Nature, 1967, 213, 901.
12 H. M. Rietveld, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 1969, 2, 65.
13 W. N. Stassen and R. D. Heyding, Can. J. Chem., 1968, 46, 2159.
14 P. H. C. Camargo, Z. Peng, X. Lu, H. Yang and Y. Xia, J. Mater.
Chem., 2009, 19, 1024.
15 M. Petrini, R. Ballini and G. Rosini, Synthesis, 1987, 713.
16 M. Quai, C. Repetto, W. Barbaglia and E. Cereda, Tetrahedron
Lett., 2007, 48, 1241.
17 M. J. Luzzio, C. L. Autry, S. K. Bhattacharya, K. D. Freeman-
Cook, M. M. Hayward, C. A. Hulford, K. L. Nelson, J. Xiao and
X. Zhao, WO 2008129380.
SACPs 1–8 were prepared and characterized with PXRD,
TEM, SAED, and EDS. The polymers are isostructural
to each other. Nanocrystalline nano-RuSe2 was obtained
by heating polymer 4 under vacuum. Catalytic performance
18 Y. Zheng, K. Ma, H. Wang, X. Sun, J. Jiang, C. Wang, R. Li and
J. Ma, Catal. Lett., 2008, 124, 268.
19 D. C. Gowda and S. Gowda, Indian J. Chem., Sect. B: Org. Chem.,
2000, 39, 709.
c
8810 Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 8808–8810
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011