W.O. Alabi et al. / Catalysis Today 226 (2014) 117–123
123
adsorbed on ZrB/Cs-X. It was suggested that the presence of the
Acknowledgements
unidentate formate indicated that formaldehyde is present in a
high concentration. ZrB2O5 form formaldehyde from methanol.
In the present study, however, the formation of unidentate for-
mate could not be detected when methanol was adsorbed on
ZrB(10)/Cs2O(4.1)/Cs-X at 623 K followed by cooling down to
room temperature, the same condition we could observe the
unidentate formate on ZrB/Cs-X. The formaldehyde formed on
the dispersed ZrB2O5 particles might undergo further dehydro-
genation over strong basic sites of Cs2O/Cs-X, and undetectable
by IR. The enhancement of activity by modification is sug-
gested to be due to the formation of formaldehyde on the
ZrB2O5 dispersed on the external surface of the Cs2O/Cs-X
crystallites.
Enhancement of styrene selectivity caused by the modifica-
tion of Cs2O/Cs-X with ZrB2O5 results from the suppression of the
transfer hydrogenation of styrene to ethylbenzene. The suppres-
sion effect cannot be interpreted by the existence of the dispersed
ZrB2O5 particles on the Cs2O/Cs-X surfaces. Some chemical inter-
action should occur between ZrB2O5 or elements of ZrB2O5 and
the active sites for the transfer hydrogenation. There are, how-
ever, no data to show such interaction at present. The mechanism
of the suppression effect of ZrB2O5 is an issue to be elucidated in
future.
The authors are grateful to King Abdulaziz City for Science &
Technology (KACST) for financial support of this research through
Project #AR-30-253. The authors also appreciate the support from
the Ministry of Higher Education, Saudi Arabia in establishment
of the Center of Research Excellence in Petroleum Refining and
Petrochemicals at KFUPM.
References
[1] Y.N. Sidorenko, P.N. Galich, V.S. Gutrya, V.G. Ill’in, I.E. Neimark, Dokl. Akad. Nauk
SSSR 173 (1967) 132–134.
[2] N. Edwards, V. Vadhri, M. Mukherjee, ACS annual meeting, Session, (MON-PM)
SciMix, Div. I&EC, Poster No. 19143, Philadelphia, August, 2012.
[3] T. Yashima, K. Sato, T. Hayasaka, N. Hara, J. Catal. 26 (1972) 303–312.
[4] M.L. Unland, J. Phys. Chem. 82 (1978) 580–583.
[5] S.T. King, J.M. Garces, J. Catal. 104 (1987) 59–70.
[6] P.E. Hathaway, M.E. Davis, J. Catal. 119 (1989) 497–507.
[7] X. Wang, G. Wang, D. Shen, C. Fu, M. Wei, Zeolites 11 (1991) 254.
[8] W.S. Wieland, R. Davis, J.M. Garces, Catal. Today 28 (1996) 443–450.
[9] A.E. Palomares, G. Rder-Mirth, J.A. Lercher, J. Catal. 168 (1997) 442–449.
[10] W.S. Wieland, R.J. Davis, J.M. Garces, J. Catal. 173 (1998) 490–500.
[11] C. Lacroix, A. Deluzarche, A. Kinnemann, A. Boyer, Zeolite 4 (1984) 109–111.
[12] M.L. Unland, G.E. Baker, in: W.R. Moser (Ed.), Catalysis in Organic reactions,
Marcel Dekker, New York, Basel, 1981, p. 51.
[13] H.-C. Lin, R.J. Spohn, US Pat. 4,483,936, Exxon Res. Eng. (1984).
[14] H.-C. Liu, US Pat. 4,483,937, Exxon Res. Eng. (1984).
[15] D. Barthomeuf, V.Q. deQuirillic, US Pat. 5,068,483, CNRS (1991).
[16] B.B. Tope, W.O. Alabi, A.M. Aitani, H. Hattori, S.S. Al-Khattaf, Appl. Catal. A
443/444 (2012) 214–220.
[17] P.E. Hathaway, M.E. Davis, J. Catal. 116 (1989) 263–276.
[18] S.V. Bordawekar, R. Davis, J. Catal. 189 (2000) 79–90.
[19] H. Tsuji, F. Yagi, H. Hattori, Chem. Lett. 20 (1991) 1881–1884.
[20] E.J. Doskocil, R.J. Davis, J. Catal. 188 (1999) 353–364.
[21] J.C. Kim, H.-X. Li, C.-Y. Chen, M.E. Davis, Microporous Mater. 2 (1994) 413–423.
[22] J. Li, R.J. Davis, Appl. Catal. A 239 (2003) 59–70.
[23] F. Yagi, H. Tsuji, H. Hattori, Microporous Mater. 9 (1997) 237–245.
[24] I. Rodoriguez, H. Cambon, D. Brunel, M. Lasperas, P. Geneste, Stud. Surf. Sci.
Catal. 78 (1993) 623–630.
[25] I. Rodrigues, H. Cambon, D. Brunel, M. Lasperas, J. Mol. Catal. A 130 (1998)
195–202.
[26] U. Rymsa, M. Hunger, H. Knoezinger, J. Weitkamp, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 125
(1999) 197–204.
[27] J. Engelhart, J. Szanyi, J. Valyon, J. Catal. 107 (1987) 296–306.
[28] Y. Kito, T. Uda, A. Kashiwaya, JP 57-68144(A) (1982).
[29] J.S. Knyrim, H. Huppertz, Z. Naturforsch. B: Chem. Sci. 63 (2008) 707–712.
[30] F. Yagi, N. Kanuka, H. Tsuji, S. Nakata, H. Kita, H. Hattori, Microporous Mater. 9
(1997) 229–235.
4. Conclusions
1. Modification of Cs-X with Cs2O enhances the activity of the
side-chain alkylation, which is caused by generation of strong
basic sites to efficiently deprotonate toluene to form benzyl
anion. Addition of ca. 1–5 wt% of Cs2O to Cs-X gives the highest
activity.
2. Modification of Cs-X with Cs2O reduced the styrene selectiv-
ity, because the modification with Cs2O facilitates the transfer
hydrogenation of styrene to ethylbenzene which is the main
pathway to form ethylbenzene.
3. Modification of Cs2O/Cs-X with ZrB2O5 enhances the activity,
optimum amount of ZrB2O5 being 10 wt%. Enhancement of the
activity by addition of ZrB2O5 is caused by facile formation of
formaldehyde from methanol by ZrB2O5.
4. Modification of Cs2O/Cs-X with ZrB2O5 enhances the styrene
selectivity, which is caused by suppression of the transfer hydro-
genation of styrene to ethylbenzene. The styrene selectivity
increases with an increase in ZrB2O5 loading up to 15 wt%.
[31] M.L. Hair, Infrared Spectroscopy in Surface Chemistry, Marcel Dekker, New
York, 1967, pp. 204.
[32] Y. Ono, H. Hattori, Solid Base Catalysis Springer Series in Chemical Physics, 101,
Springer-Verlag/Tokyo Institute of Technology Press, Berlin/Heidelberg, 2011.
[33] J.M. Garces, G.E. Vrieland, S.I. Bates, F.M. Scheidt, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 20 (1985)
67.