A R T I C L E S
Chauhan et al.
(i) Mercury Poisoning Experiment. Pd (OAc)2 (0.02 mmol, 0.005
g), styrene (1.00 mmol, 0.12 mL), and PMHS (2.00 mmol, 0.12 mL)
were dissolved in 2.5 mL if benzene in a Schlenk tube. The reaction
was allowed to stir until the presence of “Pd”-nanoclusters in the
reaction mixture was confirmed by TEM and UV-vis spectroscopy.
The reaction mixture turned colorless after the addition of mercury
[2:1, Hg:Pd(OAc)2] at room temperature. Characterization of the
solution was performed by TEM and NMR spectroscopy. No nano-
clusters were found during the TEM examination of the grid prepared,
after the addition of mercury.
NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz) δ 14.10, 23.04, 32.11, 115.27, 120.80, 127.81,
130.39.
1
3-Phenylpropionitrile (Entry 4; Table 2): H NMR (CDCl3, 200
MHz) δ 2.09(t), 2.54(t), 6.99(m), 7.15(m), 7.62(m); 13C NMR (CDCl3,
200 MHz) δ 18.73, 31.22, 118.78, 129.55, 130.76,137.96, 149.93; FT-
IR (CHCl3) 1280 (-CN), 2962 (C-H).
(2-Chloroethyl)benzene (Entry 5; Table 2): 1H NMR (CDCl3, 200
MHz) δ 2.98(t), 3.89(t), 7.09(m), 7.16(m), 7.37(m); 13C NMR (CDCl3,
200 MHz) δ 30.52, 52.32, 124.5, 127.32, 129.39, 144.23, 173.24; FT-
IR (CHCl3) 1760 (CdO), 2982 (C-H).
1,2-Diphenylethane (Entry 6; Table 2): 1H NMR (CDCl3, 200
MHz) δ 2.73(t), 6.90(m), 7.20(m), 7.35(m); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 200
MHz) δ 38.45, 126.12, 127.45, 129.36.
(ii) Thiol Poisoning Experiments. Pd (OAc)2 (0.02 mmol, 0.005
g), styrene (1.00 mmol, 0.12 mL), and PMHS (2.00 mmol, 0.12 mL)
were dissolved in 2.5 mL of benzene in a Schlenk tube. The reaction
mixture was examined by TEM to verify the presence of “Pd”-
nanoclusters. Dodecanethiol (0.04 mmol, 0.01 mL) was added to the
reaction mixture, and the reaction mixture was allowed to stir for up
1
2-Ethylnaphthalene (Entry 7; Table 2): H NMR (CDCl3, 200
MHz) δ 1.13(t), 2.62(q), 7.20-7.25(m), 7.42(1H, m), 7.58(m); 13C
NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz) δ 15.49, 29.01, 124.97, 125.51, 125.78,
127.04, 131.93, 133.70, 141.71.
1
to 24 h. H NMR spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy
(TEM) were employed to monitor the progress and the presence of
nanoclusters in the reaction mixture, respectively, after a regular period
of 2 h.
9-Ethylanthracene (Entry 8; Table 2): 1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz)
δ 1.50(t), 3.65(q), 6.82(m), 7.30(m), 7.64(m), 7.75(m), 8.34(m),
8.39(m); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz) δ 16.8, 25.2, 124.4, 124.9, 125.0,
126.0, 128.2, 131.5, 132.2.
Procedure for Enone Hydrogenation. As outlined above for other
alkenes, identical reaction conditions, molar ratios, and product isolation
procedures were used. In all of the cases, reduction reactions were
complete within 4-6 h at room temperature.
Propionic Acid Methyl Ester (Entry 1; Table 3): 1H NMR (CDCl3,
200 MHz) δ 1.02(t), 1.72, 3.92(q); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz) δ
9.1, 26.1, 50.4, 172.0.
(iii) Generation of Polysiloxane-Stabilized “Pd”-Nanoclusters.
Pd(OAc)2 (0.09 g, 0.4 mmol) was dissolved in 20 mL of benzene in a
50-mL round-bottom flask at room temperature. PMHS (0.72 mL, 12.00
mmol) was added to this solution. A color change from yellow to black
was observed within 5-10 min of stirring with vigorous evolution of
gas (H2, presumably). Black solid was observed after stirring the
solution for 2-3 h, and the reaction mixture turned colorless. The
stirring was stopped at this point, the reaction mixture was filtered under
vacuum, and black residue was collected after washing with an excess
of toluene. The black solid obtained was characterized by CP/MAS
29Si NMR spectroscopy, FT-IR spectroscopy, and scanning electron
microscopy (SEM). 29Si (CPMAS NMR) δ -36.15 (Me-Si-H-con-
taining silicons), -64.74 (Me-Si-OCOR), -75.74 (Me-Si-OH),
-110.94 (SiO3). FT-IR spectra (KBr) 2162(m), 1021(b), 900.77(s),
2964.86 (m).
Experimental Details of Redispersion Studies. Independently
synthesized polysiloxane-encapsulated “Pd”-nanoclusters (0.01 g),
styrene (1.0 mmol, 0.12 mL), and PMHS (0.25 mmol, 0.015 mL) were
mixed together in 2.5 mL of benzene in a 25 mL Schlenk tube. All of
the reactions were performed at room temperature. A hydrogen balloon
was used to maintain a constant positive pressure of hydrogen (H2,
gas) in the Schlenk tube during the reaction. The reaction mixture was
analyzed with TEM after being stirred for 30 min at room temperature.
Stirring was stopped after 5 h, and NMR spectroscopy examination of
the reaction mixture was performed.
Propionic Acid Butyl Ester (Entry 2, Table 3): 1H NMR (CDCl3,
200 MHz) δ 0.810(t), 1.02(t), 1.26(q), 1.50(m), 2.23(q), 3.99(m); 13C
NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz) δ 9.15, 13.70, 19.14, 27.62, 30.71, 64.19,
174.60; FT-IR (CHCl3) 1727(CdO), 3073(C-H).
Butane-2-one (Entry 3; Table 3): 1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz) δ
1.09(t), 1.85(q), 3.55; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz) δ 18.24, 33.85,
51.51, 167.65; FT-IR (CHCl3) 1698(CdO).
1
1-Cyclohexylethanone (Entry 4, Table 3): H NMR (CDCl3, 200
MHz) δ 0.80(m), 1.22(m), 1.56(m), 1.70(m), 1.96(m), 2.11(m); 13C
NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz) δ 14.28, 22.59, 25.86, 27.98, 28.65, 34.38,
51.63, 212.27; FT-IR (CHCl3) 1680(CdO).
1, 3-Diphenyl Propan-1-one (Entry 5, Table 3): 1H NMR (CDCl3,
200 MHz) δ 3.11(t), 3.33(t), 7.24(m), 7.28(m), 7.34(m), 7.47(m),
7.59(m), 8.01(m); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz) δ 30.05, 40.34, 126.05,
127.96, 128.25, 132.92, 136.80, 141.22, 199.03; FT-IR (CHCl3)
1680(CdO), 2958(C-H).
Ethylferrocene (Scheme 4): 1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz) δ 1.09(t),
2.27(q), 4.00(m), 4.73, 6.84(m), 7.43(m), 7.64(m); 13C NMR (CDCl3,
200 MHz) δ 8.25, 27.26, 62.03, 63.83, 65.07, 105.65.
Typical Procedure for Hydrogenation of Alkenes Conjugated
with Aromatic Functional Groups. Pd(OAc)2 (0.02 mmol, 0.005 g)
or Pd colloids (0.010 g), PMHS (2.00 mmol, 0.12 mmol), and styrene
(1.00 mmol, 0.12 mL) were added together at room temperature in 2.5
mL of freshly dried and distilled benzene. Evolution of gas (presumably
hydrogen) was observed during the stirring at room temperature. The
progress of the reactions was monitored by 1H, 13C NMR, FT-IR, and
UV spectroscopy. Stirring was stopped after 4 h. The reaction mixture
was centrifuged, and the filtrate was passed through a silica gel column
to obtain pure product. In all of the cases, the formation of the
corresponding reduction products was achieved within 3-8 h, unless
noted otherwise.
Acknowledgment. B.P.S.C. acknowledges support from a
NIST-research grant, a NSF-instrumentation grant, a GRTI (The
Graduate Research and Technology Initiative) grant, a Merck-
AAA grant, a PSC-CUNY grant, and a CSI-CUNY startup grant.
We also thank the “Deans Summer Scholarships Program”
(T.B.). Our thanks are also due to Professor Bill L’Amoreaux
for helping with the EM analysis.
1
Supporting Information Available: UV-vis spectra of the
reaction mixture indicating the conversion of Pd(OAc)2 to “Pd”-
nanoclusters and a TEM image of dodecanethiol-passivated,
catalytically inactive, yet soluble “Pd”-nanoparticles. This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at
Ethylbenzene (Entry 1; Table 2): H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz) δ
1.12(t), 2.53(q), 7.12(m), 7.21(m), 6.98(m); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 200
MHz) δ 16.26, 28.75, 140.32, 127.5, 129.32, 125.45.
1-Ethyl-4-methoxybenzene (Entry 2; Table 2): 1H NMR (CDCl3,
200 MHz) δ 1.24 (t), 2.59(q), 3.73(s), 6.72(m), 7.01(m); 13C NMR
(CDCl3, 200 MHz) δ 16.1, 28.6, 56, 114, 128.9, 132.5, 159.2.
1
2-Propylphenol (Entry 3; Table 2): H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz)
δ 0.88(t), 1.57(q), 2.47(t), 4.07, 6.5(m), 6.7(m), 6.91(m), 7.01(m); 13
C
JA049604J
9
8500 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 27, 2004