Full Papers
the quantitative and selective conversion of conjugated olefin
1a to the corresponding carbonyl compound (2a). The nature
of the solvent was found to strongly affect the yield and selec-
tivity of the reaction (Table 3, entries 1–6).
pore clogging and it is ultimately detrimental to the catalytic
performance. The type of support did not have an influence
on the chemoselectivity of the reaction, but lower selectivity
towards 2a was observed in organic solvents (Table 3, en-
tries 1–6). The use of alternative H sources, such as HCOONa or
HCOONH4 and the addition of triethylamine (triethylamine/
formic acid 2:5),[25] had no beneficial effects and instead led to
lower substrate conversion and selectivity (Table 3, entries 9,
10, and 11).
In nonpolar media, such as toluene, only moderate conver-
sion was observed (Table 3, entry 1). More polar and aprotic
solvents, such as THF (59%) and CH2Cl2 (63%), provided good
to moderate conversion towards hydrogenation product 2a
(Table 3, entries 2, and 3). Slightly higher conversion was ob-
tained by using a polar and protic solvent, such as MeOH,
whereas the reaction in pure water was sluggish because of
poor substrate solubility (Table 3, entries 4, and 5). However,
a mixture of MeOH and water (MeOH/water=2:3 v/v) provided
an ideal reaction medium allowing quantitative conversion of
1a and absolute chemoselectivity (Table 3, entry 6). Further op-
timization of the reaction conditions showed that the high cat-
alytic activity of Pd/KCC-1-NH2 allows the reaction temperature
to be reduced to 808C (Table 3, entry 12), the palladium con-
centration to be reduced by half (Table 3, entry 13), and the re-
action time to be significantly reduced (Table 3, entries 14, and
15) without, or with only minor, effects on the catalytic effi-
ciency. A reaction time of 12 h proved to be sufficient to
achieve full conversion of the starting material.
Alternative reducing agents, such as hydrazine[26] and an
amino borane,[27] have also been tested under the same reac-
tion conditions (see the Supporting Information, Table S-3).
The generality of the optimized protocol was assessed by
using a variety of substrates (Table 4). The catalyst exhibited
high activity for the hydrogenation of differently substituted
double bonds and the desired products were afforded in quan-
titative yields (Table 4, entries 1–7). (E)-Stilbene was poorly
soluble in the MeOH/H2O mixture, however the reaction was
carried out successfully by using THF as a solvent (Table 4,
entry 4). The reaction protocol allowed the facile and selective
hydrogenation of functionalized unsaturated compounds, such
as nitriles and amides (Table 4, entries 8, 9). When 3-nitrostyr-
ene was used as a substrate, the products of hydrogenation at
only one of the reducible functionalities (mostly at the double
bond) along with the product of complete hydrogenation (3-
ethylaniline) were observed. By employing three equivalents of
formic acid under the same reaction conditions the exclusive
and quantitative formation of 3-ethylaniline was observed,
thus showing that Pd/KCC-1-NH2 can efficiently reduce both
functionalities, albeit not selectively (Table 4, entry 10, 11). The
hydrogenation of 4-bromostyrene was also studied (Table 4,
entry 12). This substrate did not afford the expected hydroge-
nation product; the formation of a product generated by the
Heck coupling of two molecules of 4-bromostyrene was de-
tected as the main reaction product (see the Supporting Infor-
mation). The chemoselectivity of the catalyst was investigated
for the reduction of additional conjugated carbonyl com-
pounds. The reduction of ethyl cinnamate and of cinnamic
acid (Table 4, entries 13, and 14) worked smoothly affording
high yields of the desired products with total chemoselectivity
towards the hydrogenation of the double bond. Dibenzylide-
neacetone proved to be a more challenging substrate, yielding
a mixture of the products of partial and complete hydrogena-
tion in low to moderate yields under the optimized reaction
conditions (Table 4, entry 15). We further explored the hydro-
A comparison of the catalytic activity of Pd/KCC-1-NH2 with
the Pd nanoparticles supported on the other porous silica ma-
terials (Pd/MCM-41-NH2, Pd/SBA-15-NH2) reveals the higher cat-
alytic activity of Pd/KCC-1-NH2. Although Pd/MCM-41-NH2 pres-
ents a higher Pd loading and almost double the surface area
(Table 1) compared with Pd/KCC-1-NH2, lower conversion (61%
in 24 h, Table 3, entry 7) was observed for this catalyst under
the same reaction conditions. Pd/SBA-15-NH2, with a Pd load-
ing comparable to that of Pd/KCC-1-NH2, did not perform well
as a catalyst for the hydrogenation of 1a (Table 3, entry 8).
Very similar particle size distributions have been determined
by HRTEM analysis for all the materials under identical prepara-
tive conditions, therefore, the higher catalytic activity of KCC-
1 can be attributed to the higher amount of accessible active
sites on the support surface, as highlighted by the chemisorp-
tion experiments. In addition, the particular morphology of Pd/
KCC-1-NH2 can support faster mass transfer because of the
larger pore size (Table 1). For the other two supports, the situa-
tion appears more complex. The pore size and pore volume of
Pd/SBA-15-NH2 are larger than that of Pd/MCM-41-NH2. Larger
pores should enhance mass transfer and accelerate the reac-
tion, that is, the activity of Pd/SBA-15-NH2 should be higher
than that of Pd/MCM-41-NH2. However, this is not the case.
Moreover, the accessible Pd surface area is found to be clearly
smaller for Pd/MCM-41-NH2 (Table 2), which indicates a complex
superimposition of site accessibility, sorption effects, and mass
transfer. Interestingly, an hydrothermally prepared Pd catalyst
(2.8 wt% Pd) supported on MCM-41[16] proved to be an excel-
lent catalyst for the transfer hydrogenation of olefins and con-
jugated carbonyl compounds at 708C in methanol; in this
case, the catalyst was reported to display a BET surface area of
970 m2 gÀ1 and a pore volume of 0.78 cm3 gÀ1. This result con-
firms that for the case of MCM-41 the preparation of a high
loading of 3-APTES-stabilized Pd nanoparticles can lead to
genation of
a cyclic enone, such as 2-cyclohexen-1-one
(Table 4, entries 16, and 17); this reaction afforded a mixture of
cyclohexanone and phenol. The formation of phenol can be at-
tributed to the aerobic dehydrogenation of the cyclohexenone
moiety and this reaction has been reported to be promoted
by molecular Pd complexes[28] or by Pd/C;[29] the involvement
of Pd nanoparticles in this process has been proposed.[30] Inter-
estingly, cyclohexanone is also formed in the absence of formic
acid, with phenol being the main product in this case. There-
fore, 1-cyclohex-2-enone can behave as the hydrogen donor
for the reduction of the double bond of another molecule of
the same compound. Increasing the amount of formic acid
&
ChemCatChem 0000, 00, 0 – 0
4
ꢀ 0000 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ÝÝ These are not the final page numbers!