Kinetic Resolution of Secondary Alcohols
FULL PAPER
formed. Dealuminated nanocrystalline zeolite beta seeds (~50 nm,
0.105 g) in water (2.4 mL) were added. The crystallization was carried
out in a Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave at 1408Cfor 10 days.
washing with 0.6m NaHCO3 solution (320 mL). The organic layer was
dried with anhydrous Na2SO4 and styrene and hexane were removed by
vacuum distillation (1 mbar at 508Cfor 2 h). After work-up, essentially
pure (R)-1-phenylethyl octanoate was obtained with an isolated yield of
72% and 97.7% ee (average from two runs).
Synthesis of Al-beta zeolites: Beta zeolites with Si/Al 75–200 were pre-
pared according to reference [18]. Typically, aluminium metal was dis-
solved in TEAOH (40 wt%) followed by the addition of deionized water
and fumed silica (Aerosil 200). The mixture was stirred for 2 h before
being placed in a Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave and kept at 1408C
for 3 days under autogenous pressure. The molar composition of the final
Acknowledgements
gel mixture was Al2O3:xSiO2:(0.26x+1)TEA2O:15xH2O, for which x
ranged from 400 to 150. The samples are denoted Al-n, for which n
A
Financial support for this work from the National University of Singa-
pore grants R-143–000–188–112 and R-143–000–201–112 is gratefully ac-
knowledged. We thank Mr. Lester Poon, undergraduate exchange student
from the University of British Columbia, for his help with the scale-up
experiment.
stands for the Si/Al ratio (75–200).
Catalyst characterization: The surface area and porosity properties were
determined by using nitrogen adsorption (Micromeritics Tristar). Prior to
measurement, the samples were thoroughly degassed under a nitrogen
flow for 4 h. The formation of the crystalline phase was measured by
using powder X-ray diffractometry (Siemens D5005 with Cu anode and
variable slits). To determine the hydrophobicity of the samples in terms
of amount of water lost, the weight loss was monitored by thermogravi-
metric analysis (TGA) in a Dupont SDT 2960 analyzer. About 5–10 mg
of sample was first dried in a flow of dry nitrogen (100 mLminÀ1) before
[1] a) Developments in Global Chiral Technologies, Frost & Sullivan,
May 2003, cited in A. M. Rouhi, Chem. Eng. News 2004, 82, 47–62;
b) SusChem—A European Technology Platform for Sustainable
Chemistry: The Vision for 2025 and Beyond, March 2005; available
at http://www.suschem.org/media.php?mId=2170 (accessed July
2006).
[2] a) R. Noyori, T. Ikeda, T. Ohkuma, M. Widhalm, M. Kitamura, H.
Takaya, S. Akutagawa, N. Sayo, T. Saito, T. Taketomi, H. Kumo-
bayashi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 9134–9135; b) M. Kitamura,
M. Tokunaga, R. Noyori, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 144–152.
[3] A. Zaks, A. Klibanov, Science 1984, 224, 1249–1251.
[4] a) S. Akai, K. Tanimoto, Y. Kita, Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 1431–
1434; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1407–1410; ; b) O. Pꢂmies, J.-
E Bäckvall, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2003, 14, 407–413; c) J. J. Venit,
G. D. Madding (Bristol Myers Squibb Company),WO-02/28809,
2002; d) S. F. Mayer, A. Steinreiber, R. V. A. Orru, K. Faber, J. Org.
Chem. 2002, 67, 9115–9121; e) K. Faber, Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7,
5005–5010; f) U. T. Strauss, U. Felfer, K. Faber, Tetrahedron: Asym-
metry 1999, 10, 107–117.
[5] a) P. M. Dinh, J. A. Horwarth, A. R. Hudnott, J. M. J. Williams, W.
Harris, Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 7623–7626; b) T. H. Riermeier, P.
Gross, A. Monsees, M. Hoff, H. Trauthwein, Tetrahedron Lett. 2005,
46, 3403–3406.
[6] a) J. H. Koh, H. M. Jung, M.-J. Kim, J. Park, Tetrahedron Lett. 1999,
40, 6281–6284; b) B. A. Persson, A. L. E. Larsson, M. Le Ray, J.-E.
Bäckvall, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1645–1650; c) A. Dijksman,
J. M. Elzinga, Y.-X. Li, I. W. E. Arends, R. A. Sheldon, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2002, 13, 879–884.
[7] M. T. Reetz, K. Schimossek, Chimia 1996, 50, 668–669.
[8] S. Y. Kalliney, M. V. Ruggeri (Schering-Plough Corporation), WO-
91/08196, 1991.
[9] D. W. House (UOP), US-5476964, 1995.
[10] P. ꢃdman, L. A. Wessjohann, U. Bornscheuer, J. Org. Chem. 2005,
70, 9551–9555.
[11] S. Wuyts, D. E. De Vos, F. Verpoort, D. Depla, R. D. Gryse, P. A.
Jacobs, J. Catal. 2003, 219, 417–424.
[12] S. Wuyts, K. De Temmerman, D. E. De Vos, P. A. Jacobs, Chem.
Eur. J. 2005, 11, 386–397.
[13] D. Klomp, T. Maschmeyer, U. Hanefeld, J. A. Peters, Chem. Eur. J,
2004, 10, 2008–2093.
[14] S. Wuyts, K. De Temmerman, D. De Vos, P. Jacobs, Chem. Commun.
2003, 1928–1929.
increasing the temperature to 8008Cat 10 8CminÀ1
.
IR spectroscopy of adsorbed pyridine was employed to determine the
type of acidic sites present on the zeolites. The IR spectra were recorded
by using a Bruker Equinox 55 with a resolution of 2 cmÀ1. Typically, sam-
ples were pressed into self-supported wafers of 8–10 mg. The wafer was
mounted inside a Pyrex IR cell with NaCl windows and dried under
vacuum (~10À3 mbar) for 2 h at 3008C. After cooling to RT, a back-
ground spectrum was recorded. Subsequently, the sample was exposed to
pyridine at 22 mbar for 15 min. The pyridine was pumped off and the
sample was evacuated under vacuum (~10À3 mbar) for 1 h before an IR
spectrum was recorded. The sample was then heated to 1008Cfor 1 h
under vacuum to desorb loosely bound pyridine, cooled to RT, and an-
other IR spectrum was recorded. A further measurement was taken after
desorption at 2008C.
Racemization of (S)-1-phenylethanol: The racemization of (S)-1-phenyle-
thanol was carried out in a two-necked round-bottomed flask equipped
with septum port, reflux condenser, and a guard tube. Typically, (S)-1-
phenylethanol (0.25 mmol; ee>99.5%) was dissolved in toluene (5 mL)
and heated to 608C. Catalyst (100 mg) was added to the reaction mixture
(time=0) Progress of the reaction and enantiomeric excess were moni-
tored by performing gas chromatography (column: Supelco Beta Dex 325
(250 mm0.25 mm25 m); flame ionization detector). Only the two iso-
mers of 1-phenylethanol, and the byproduct, styrene, were observed.
Dynamic kinetic resolution of 1-phenylethanol: The zeolite catalyst (50–
400 mg) was added to a reaction mixture of 1 mmol racemic (R,S)-1-phe-
nylethanol in solvent (5 mL) and Novozym 435 (30 mg). The reaction
slurry was stirred and heated to the desired temperature, normally 608C,
although temperatures of 50–808Cwere also studied. At time t=0, iso-
propenyl acetate (2 mmol) was added. The progress of the reaction was
monitored by performing gas chromatography using a Supelco Beta
Dex 325 chiral capillary column. The identity of the products was verified
by comparing the retention times and GC/MS spectra with authentic
samples. As well as isopropenyl acetate, other esters, such as vinyl ace-
tate, vinyl butyrate, and vinyl octanoate, were also used as acyl-transfer
reagents. A Supelco Beta Dex 120 column was used for separating the
enantiomers of phenyl butyrate and phenyl octanoate. Close to 100%
conversion was reached after about 2 h of reaction at 608C.
Scale-up to a semipreparative scale: 1-Phenylethanol (1.22 g, 10 mmol)
and vinyl octanoate (1.70 g, 10 mmol) were dissolved in toluene (5 mL),
and Novozyme 435 (150 mg) was added after the temperature had
reached 608C. After 2 h, zeolite beta Al-150 (250 mg) was added to the
reaction mixture and the reaction was allowed to proceed for another
4 h. At completion of reaction, the solid catalysts were removed by filtra-
tion, and toluene was distilled off under reduced pressure. The product
containing mainly 1-phenylethyl octanoate and side products, such as
styrene and octanoic acid (due to the hydrolysis of vinyl octanoate), were
redissolved in hexane (20 mL) and the octanoic acid was removed by
[15] A. Corma, M. E. Domine, S. Valencia, J. Catal. 2003, 215, 294–304.
[16] Y.-Z. Zhu, G. K. Chuah, S. Jaenicke, J. Catal. 2004, 227, 1–10.
[17] T. Blasco, M. A. Camblor, A. Corma, P. Esteve, J. M. Guil, A. Marti-
nez, J. A. Perdigꢄn-Melꢄn, S. Valencia, J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102,
75–88.
[18] M. A. Camblor, A. Corma, A. Mifud, J. Pꢅrez-Pariente, S. Valencia,
Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 1997, 105, 341–348.
Received: May 24, 2006
Published online: September 27, 2006
Chem. Eur. J. 2007, 13, 541 – 547
ꢁ 2007 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
547