RESEARCH
| REPORTS
radicals are obtained from stable, and in the case
of aryl chlorides, inexpensive bulk chemicals, under
very mild and metal-free reaction conditions.
REFERENCES AND NOTES
1. J. J. Concepcion, R. L. House, J. M. Papanikolas, T. J. Meyer,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 15560–15564 (2012).
2. D. M. Schultz, T. P. Yoon, Science 343, 1239176 (2014).
3. C. K. Prier, D. A. Rankic, D. W. C. MacMillan, Chem. Rev. 113,
5322–5363 (2013).
4. J. Xuan, W. J. Xiao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 6828–6838 (2012).
5. F. Teplý, Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 76, 859–917 (2011).
6. D. P. Hari, P. Schroll, B. Koenig, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134,
2958–2961 (2012).
7. D. Ravelli, D. Dondi, M. Fagnoni, A. Albini, Chem. Soc. Rev. 38,
1999–2011 (2009).
Fig. 4. Proposed catalytic mechanism. S–H, solvents.
8. D. P. Hari, B. Koenig, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 4734–4743 (2013).
9. J. D. Nguyen, E. M. D’Amato, J. M. R. Narayanam,
C. R. J. Stephenson, Nat. Chem. 4, 854–859 (2012).
10. D. P. Hari, T. Hering, B. Koenig, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 725 (2014).
11. Y. X. Liu et al., Synlett 24, 507–513 (2013).
moisture-sensitive donor molecules, which require
strict inert reaction conditions, UV-A irradiation,
and strongly basic conditions that are incom-
patible with many functional groups. Aryl chlorides
bearing electron withdrawing groups gave the cor-
responding reduction products with good to ex-
cellent yields in photocatalytic conditions (entries
13 to 17 in Fig. 2) that require only mixing of sub-
strates, PDI, Et3N, and irradiation with visible light.
Next, we applied the aryl radical intermediates
for C–C bond-forming arylation reactions. Chal-
lenge in this case is competition from fast hy-
drogen abstraction of the aryl radical from the
solvent and the radical cation of Et3N (33). We
therefore selected as the reaction partner N-
heterocyclic pyrroles, which were found to have
high reaction rates in the addition of radicals.
Substantial amounts of the expected arylation
product were indeed obtained by irradiating aryl
halides in the presence of N-methylpyrrole and
catalytic amounts of PDI. The reduction product
is a minor by-product but dominates when fu-
ran or thiophene are used as reaction partner.
Changing the solvent from DMF, which favors
the reduction product, to DMSO improved the
yields greatly. Isolated yields of functionalized
N-methylpyrrole derivatives obtained from differ-
ent substituted aryl halides are depicted in Fig. 3.
As in the photoreduction reaction, the C–H aryl-
ation reaction with N-methylpyrrole could also
be performed with N,N′-bis(3-pentyl)perylene-
3,4,9,10-bis(dicarboximide) (entry 6 in Fig. 3).
The reaction scope was extended to other pyrrole
derivatives affording arylated products in good
to excellent yields (Fig. 3).
The photoreduction of aryl halides appears to
proceed via a radical mechanism (23, 34), as evi-
denced by the conversion of 2-(allyloxy)-1,3,5-
tribromobenzene to the 5-exo cyclization product
5,7-dibromo-3-methyl-2,3-dihydrobenzofuran
(entry 12, Fig. 3), which implies a radical inter-
mediate (12, 34). Furthermore, the reduction reac-
tion of 4′-bromoacetophenone in the presence
of 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidinoxyl (TEMPO) gave
the expected TEMPO adduct (see the supplemen-
tary materials). The formation of a PDI dianion,
which could be formed via a two-electron reduc-
tion (35), was not detected under the reaction
conditions (compare Fig. 1B and fig. S4 with
fig. S3; fig. S3 shows the absorption spectrum
of the electrochemically generated PDI dianion).
The photoreduction of 4′-bromoacetophenone
was minimal in air, preventing the formation
of the PDI radical anion (entry 6 in table S1,
Fig. 1B, and fig. S5). In the absence of light, no
reduction product is obtained: 4′-bromoaceto-
phenone added to a photochemically gener-
ated PDI radical anion (by photo-irradiating
the mixture of PDI and Et3N) and kept in the
dark for 4 hours was not converted (entries 9
and 11 in table S1). When the reaction mixture
was then illuminated with 455-nm light, aceto-
phenone was obtained in yields comparable to
the normal photoreduction protocol. Reduc-
tion of 4′-bromoacetophenone also did not occur
when the substrate was added to a chemically
generated [using (Et4N)2S2O4 as chemical reduc-
tant of PDI] radical anion (see entry 10 in table
S1). Degradation products of the catalyst formed
during the course of the reaction may still con-
tribute to substrate conversion because only the
perylene core is required (compare PDI and N,N′-
bis(3-pentyl)perylene-3,4,9,10-bis(dicarboximide):
The substituents in the amide nitrogens of per-
ylene have almost no influence on the photo-
physical properties and are mainly introduced to
increase the solubility of perylene diimides) (25).
All experiments support the proposed catalytic
cycle shown in Fig. 4. Excited PDI* is reductively
quenched by Et3N to give PDI•– and the radical
cation of triethylamine (Et3N•+) (27). Upon the
second excitation, PDI•–* reduces the substrate yield-
ing the aryl radical precursor (ArX•–) and regen-
erating the neutral PDI. Fragmentation of ArX•–
yields the aryl radical, which abstracts a hydro-
gen atom from either Et3N•+ or solvents to yield
the reduction products, or reacts with unsat-
urated compounds yielding C–C coupling pro-
ducts. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry
(GC-MS) analysis of the crude product mixture
confirmed the formation of diethylamine, and
hydrogen atom abstraction reduction reactions
in D7-DMF gave deuterated products (see the
supplementary materials).
12. H. Kim, C. Lee, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 12303–12306 (2012).
13. The excited state redox potential of fac-Ir(ppy)3 is estimated
to be –1.73 versus SCE (9). Some metal complexes with even
stronger reducing power in the excited state have been
reported but have not been applied to photoredox catalysis (14).
14. S. B. Harkins, J. C. Peters, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 2030–2031 (2005).
15. The Rehm-Weller equation estimates the reduction potential
of a photoredox catalyst in its excited state from the ground-
state redox potential and the E0-0 transition energy (28).
16. For a recent example of two-step photoexcitation (Z scheme)
of heterogeneous semiconductor in water splitting, see (24).
17. M. T. Pirnot, D. A. Rankic, D. B. C. Martin, D. W. C. MacMillan,
Science 339, 1593–1596 (2013).
18. L. Furst, B. S. Matsuura, J. M. R. Narayanam, J. W. Tucker,
C. R. J. Stephenson, Org. Lett. 12, 3104–3107 (2010).
19. J. M. R. Narayanam, J. W. Tucker, C. R. J. Stephenson, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 131, 8756–8757 (2009).
20. D. A. Nicewicz, D. W. C. MacMillan, Science 322, 77–80 (2008).
21. E. Cahard et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 3673–3676 (2012).
22. C. Costentin, M. Robert, J. M. Savéant, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126,
16051–16057 (2004).
23. L. Pause, M. Robert, J. M. Saveant, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121,
7158–7159 (1999).
24. Y. Sasaki, H. Kato, A. Kudo, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 5441–5449
(2013).
25. F. Würthner, Chem. Commun. 2004 (14), 1564–1579 (2004).
26. D. Gosztola, M. P. Niemczyk, W. Svec, A. S. Lukas,
M. R. Wasielewski, J. Phys. Chem. A 104, 6545–6551 (2000).
27. M. J. Tauber, R. F. Kelley, J. M. Giaimo, B. Rybtchinski,
M. R. Wasielewski, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 1782–1783 (2006).
28. D. Rehm, A. Weller, Isr. J. Chem. 8, 259–271 (1970).
29. C. Ramanan, A. L. Smeigh, J. E. Anthony, T. J. Marks,
M. R. Wasielewski, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 386–397 (2012).
30. M. E. Budén, J. F. Guastavino, R. A. Rossi, Org. Lett. 15,
1174–1177 (2013).
31. Y. Cheng, X. Gu, P. Li, Org. Lett. 15, 2664–2667 (2013).
32. R. A. Rossi, A. B. Pierini, A. B. Peñéñory, Chem. Rev. 103,
71–168 (2003).
33. Z. Chami, M. Gareil, J. Pinson, J. M. Saveant, A. Thiebault,
J. Org. Chem. 56, 586–595 (1991).
34. M. Newcomb, in Encyclopedia of Radicals in Chemistry,
Biology and Materials, C. S. Chatgilialoglu, A. Studer, Eds.
(Wiley, Chichester, UK, 2012)pp. 107–124.
35. E. Shirman et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 8855–8858 (2008).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (GRK 1626)
for financial support. J.I.B. thanks the Alexander von Humboldt
Foundation for a scholarship. We thank R. Vasold for his assistance
in GC-MS measurements.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
Materials and Methods
Supplementary Text
Figs. S1 to S5
Table S1
References (36–39)
Two conPET steps using perylene diimide
dyes accumulate the energy from two visible light
excitations. The process is a minimalistic chem-
ical model of the Z scheme in biological pho-
tosynthesis and extends the scope of visible light
photocatalysis to aryl chlorides. Highly reactive aryl
2 July 2014; accepted 1 October 2014
10.1126/science.1258232
728 7 NOVEMBER 2014 • VOL 346 ISSUE 6210
sciencemag.org SCIENCE