J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4835-4836
4835
Reconstructing Aldolase Antibodies to Alter Their
Substrate Specificity and Turnover
Although these antibodies possess unusually promiscuous active
sites capable of catalyzing a wide variety of aldol and retro-aldol
reactions, the efficiency with which any given aldol is processed
can vary significantly. For example, retro-aldol reactions of
cyclohexanone-aldols 2 are relatively slow compared to those
involving acetone-aldols 3. The keto functionality appears to be
key in determining the relative efficiency of processing by these
catalysts since 3 with a wide variety of R groups are processed
efficiently. Therefore, we focused on the alteration of substrate
specificity using this strategy with the aim of preparing catalysts
that would more efficiently process 2.
Fujie Tanaka, Richard A. Lerner,* and Carlos F. Barbas, III*
The Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology and the
Department of Molecular Biology,
The Scripps Research Institute
0550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037
1
ReceiVed February 15, 2000
To retain the catalytic function of the residue LysH93, we took
Many enzymes use common catalytic mechanisms in the
catalysis of analogous chemical transformations, for example in
the hydrolysis of esters and amides. Conservation of catalytic
mechanism is observed not only among evolutionarily related and
highly homologous enzymes but also between structurally dif-
advantage of information provided by the crystal structure of
a
3
3F12.6 The structure showed the reactive lysine at the bottom
of a deep binding pocket where most of the residues within a 4
Å radius of the ꢀ-amino group of LysH93 are hydrophobic and
are thus likely key in tuning the pK of this amine group. These
a
residues are SerH35, ValH37, TrpH47, TyrH95, TrpH103, and
PheL98. TyrH95 and TrpH103 are found in HCDR3 (heavy chain
complementarity determining region 3), and PheL98 is in LCDR3.
Therefore, the sequences of the LysH93, HCDR3, and LCDR3
of the aldolase antibodies were retained in the library. A naive
1
ferent and evolutionarily unrelated enzymes. Such observations
provide evidence for evolutionary convergence at the level of
chemical mechanism. It is anticipated that structural heterogeneity
may provide for distinct opportunities for the optimization of
catalytic efficiency with different substrates where chemical
mechanism is conserved. In the case of catalytic antibodies,
immunization of mice with transition-state analogues designed
for the preparation of hydrolytic antibodies has provided a variety
of catalytic antibodies that demonstrate high levels of homology
H
antibody heavy chain variable domain (V ) library was generated
using human bone marrow cDNA and fused to the parental heavy
8
chain sequences at H93. The LCDR3 sequences of the parental
2
antibodies were placed in the context of an unrelated human light
chain, that possessed a radically different amino acid sequence
at both structural and mechanistic levels. While the immune
repertoire provides a highly diverse array of antibody genes from
which to select catalysts, immune responses to haptens are often
9
as compared to the parental aldolase antibodies. The phage
displayed libraries8 were selected by three rounds of panning
against 1,3-diketones 4- and 1-BSA (bovine serum albumin) in
order to select antibodies that would accept both 2 and 3. In a
,10
3
highly restricted to a few favored V genes. This fact acts to
experimentally limit our opportunities to probe the structural
repertoire available to antibodies more completely. To search for
novel aldolase antibodies we sought a strategy that would not be
limited by the need to reimmunize animals but one that would
take advantage of insights gained by the study of existing catalysts.
Here we examine a new strategy to obtain improved catalytic
antibodies by recombining the catalytic machinery of parental
antibodies with a naive V gene repertoire. Antibody libraries of
this type may provide new evolutionary opportunities for catalysis
not accessible through the relatively small, five or six amino acid
4
residues changes in protein sequence that are typically probed
to prepare modified or enhanced catalysts.
Aldolase antibodies 38C2 and 33F12 were previously generated
5
by reactive immunization with 1,3-diketone 1. The antibodies
subsequent diversification step, V libraries were combined with
L
are highly homologous with respect to sequence, structure, and
the selected V libraries, and three additional rounds of selection
H
catalytic mechansim.5 Both antibodies possess a highly reactive
,6
were performed.
Screening of the phage selected clones by ELISA for the
production of soluble Fab capable of binding to both 4- and
7
lysine residue (LysH93) in their active sites that is essential to
their catalytic mechanism. The ꢀ-amino group of the lysine residue
is key in the formation of Schiff base and enamine intermediates
that appear along the reaction coordinate of the aldol reaction.5,6
(6) (a) Barbas, C. F., III; Heine, A.; Zhong, G.; Hoffmann, T.; Gramatikova,
S.; Bj o¨ rnestedt, R.; List, B.; Anderson, J.; Stura, E. A.; Wilson, I. A.; Lerner,
R. A. Science 1997, 278, 2085. (b) Hoffmann, T.; Zhong, G.; List, B.; Shabat,
D.; Anderson, J.; Gramatikova, S.; Lerner, R. A.; Barbas, C. F., III. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 2768. (c) Zhong, G.; Hoffmann, T.; Lerner, R. A.;
Danishefsky, S.; Barbas, C. F., III. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 8131. (d)
List, B.; Shabat, D.; Barbas, C. F., III; Lerner, R. A. Chem. Eur. J. 1998, 4,
881. (e) Zhong, G.; Shabat, D.; List, B.; Anderson, J.; Sinha, R. A.; Lerner,
R. A.; Barbas, C. F., III. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 110, 2609. (f) List, B.;
Shabat, D.; Zhong, G.; Turner, J. M.; Li, A.; Bui, T.; Anderson, J.; Lerner, R.
A.; Barbas, C. F., III. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 7283. (g) Shabat, D.;
Rader, C.; List, B.; Lerner, R. A.; Barbas, C. F., III. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1999, 96, 6925. (h) List, B.; Lerner, R. A.; Barbas, C. F., III. Org.
Lett. 1999, 1, 59. (i) Shabat, D.; List, B.; Lerner, R. A.; Barbas, C. F., III.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999. 40, 1437. (j) Sinha, S.; Barbas, C. F., III; Lerner, R.
A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 14603.
(7) The numbering is according to Kabat et al. Kabat, E. A.; Wu, T. T.;
Perry, H. M.; Gottesman, K. S.; Foeller, C. Sequences of Proteins of
Immunological Interest, 5th ed.; U.S. Public Health Service, National Institute
of Health: Bethesda, MD, 1991.
(8) Barbas, C. F., III, Burton, D. R., Scott, J., Silverman, G., Eds. Phage
Display of Proteins and Peptides: A Laboratory Manual; Cold Spring Harbor
Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, New York, 2000.
(
1) (a) Branden, C.; Tooze, J. Introduction to Protein Structure; Garland
Publishing: New York, 1991; p 236. (b) Russell, R. B. J. Mol. Biol. 1998,
2
79, 1211. (c) Rao, J. K.; Erickson, J. W.; Wlodawer, A. Biochemistry 1991,
0, 4663.
3
(
2) (a) Angeles, T. S.; Smith, R. G.; Darsley, M. J.; Sugasawara, R.;
Sanchez, R. I.; Kenten, J.; Schultz, P. G.; Martin, M. T. Biochemistry 1993,
3
2, 12128. (b) Miyashita, H.; Hara, T.; Tanimura, R.; Tanaka, F.; Kikuchi,
M.; Fujii, I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994, 91, 6045. (c) Fujii, I.; Tanaka,
F.; Miyashita, H.; Tanimura, R.; Kinoshita, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,
6
199. (d) MacBeath, G.; Hilvert, D. Chem. Biol. 1996, 3, 433. (e) Buchbinder,
J. L.; Stephenson, R. C.; Scanlan, T. S.; Fletterick, R. J. J. Mol. Biol. 1998,
2
82, 1033. (f) Charbonnier J.-B.; Golinelli-Pimpaneau, B.; Gigant, B.; Tawfik,
D. S.; Chap, R.; Scindler, D. G.; Kim, S.-H.; Green, B. S.; Eshhar, Z.;
Knossow, M. Science 1997, 275, 1140.
(
3) Kaartinen, M.; Solin, M.-L.; M a¨ kel a¨ , O. Eur. J. Immunol. 1991, 21,
2
863.
(
4) (a) Baca, M.; Scanlan, T. S.; Stephenson, R. C.; Wells, J. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94, 10063. (b) Fujii, I.; Fukuyama, S.; Iwabuchi, Y.;
Tanimura, R. Nat. Biotechnol. 1998, 16, 463.
(
5) Wagner, J.; Lerner, R. A.; Barbas, C. F., III. Science 1995, 270, 1797.
1
0.1021/ja0005441 CCC: $19.00 © 2000 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 04/29/2000