7
70
C. Torres et al.
catalytic performance; this is due to the better distribution of
the active phase on the support which indicate that even
though the different size particle the Au NPs behave in
similar way. The lower catalytic performance of the Au/
SiO –H catalyst is attributed to the possible loss of active
grateful to CONICYT for their doctoral Fellowship. We also thanks
to REDOC.CTA Universidad de Concepci o´ n.
References
2
2
sites due to particle size agglomeration as determined by
1
. Mao J, Yan X, Gu H, Jiang L (2009) Chin J Catal 30:182
XRD and DRS UV–Vis results. Au/SiO –U was the less
2
2. Fan G-Y, Fu Zhang Lei, Yuan Hai-Yan, Lin Mao, Li R-XC, Li
Hua, Jun Xian (2010) Catal Commun 11:451
active one, this can explain due to the higher metal particle
size determined by HR-TEM. Table 4 compiled the reaction
rate constants determined for all the studied catalysts.
3
. H o¨ ller V, Wegricht D, Yuranov I, Kiwi-Minsker L, Renken A
2000) Chem Eng Technol 23:251
(
4
. Zhao F, Fujita S-i, Sun J, Ikushima Y, Arai M (2004) Catal Today
98:523
The Au/SiO –U catalyst contains the largest metal par-
2
5
6
7
. Han X, Zhou R, Lai G, Zheng X (2004) Catal Today 93–95:433
. Tijani A, Coq B, Figueras F (1991) Appl Catal 76:255
. Coq B, Tijani A, Dutartre R, Figueras F (1993) J Mol Catal A
Chem 79:253
ticles as demonstrated by HR-TEM and DRS UV–Vis
which revealed an intense plasmon at 550 nm, suggesting
that most of the nanocrystals are larger than 10 nm. This
explains why this catalyst showed a higher concentration of
intermediates within the studied time interval, leading to
the direct loss of yield to the product of interest (see
Fig. 8). It was detected a change in the conversion attrib-
uted to the catalyst deactivation for hydroxylamine irre-
versible adsorption. The products show the same tendency
up to 18 % conversion, and at higher conversion levels the
production of aniline and hidroxilamine and increment
nitrosobenzene (in this case k –k ) take place. We attrib-
8. Wang F, Liu J, Xu X (2008) Chem Commun 44:2040
. Li H, Zhao Q, Li H (2008) J Mol Catal A Chem 285:29
9
1
0. Torres GC, Jablonski EL, Baronetti GT, Castro AA, de Miguel
SR, Scelza OA, Blanco MD, Pena Jimenez MA, Fierro JLG
(
11. Tafesh AM, Weiguny J (1996) Chem Rev 96:2035
2. Escaffre P, Thorez A, Kalck P (1985) J Mol Catal A Chem 33:87
3. Figueras F, Coq B (2001) J Mol Catal A Chem 173:117
4. Augustine R (1996) Heterogeneous Catalysis for the Synthetic
Chemist. Marcel Dekker, New York
15. Auer E, Berweiler M, Gross M, Pietsch J (2000). In: Ford ME (ed)
Catalysis by Organic Reactions, vol 82. Marcel Dekker, New York,
p 293
1997) Appl Catal A 161:213
1
1
1
g
1
uted this behavior to the presence of hydroxyl groups (Si–
OH) remaining after metal deposition-reduction on the
1
6. Nishimura Handbook (2001) of Heterogeneous Catalytic
Hydrogenation for Organic Synthesis. Wiley, New York
SiO surface [45, 46]. Despite the calcination, the silanol
2
groups can be interacting with the intermediate products
from catalytic performance as shown in Fig. 9.
17. Dubois V, James G, Dallons JL, Geysel AV (1994). In: Ford M
ed) Catalysis of Organic Reactions, Marcel Dekker, New York,
p 82
(
1
1
8. Raims RK, Lambers EA, Genetti RA (1996). In: Maltz RE (ed)
Catalysis of Organic Reactions, vol 68. Marcel Dekker, New
York, p 43
9. Dale DJ, Dunn PJ, Golightly C, Hughes ML, Levett PC, Pearce
AK, Searle PM, Ward G, Wood AS (1999) Org Process Res Dev
4
Conclusions
All the catalytic systems were active in the hydrogenation of
nitrobenzene being the most active catalyst those prepared
by deposition–precipitation with NaOH at 100 °C, due to
these catalysts contain the smallest metallic crystals. The
TiO supported catalysts performed better than the SiO -
4
:17
2
2
2
0. Bond GC (2006) C. Catalysis By Gold, Imperial College Press,
Louis and D.T. Thompson
1. Zhang J, Wang Y, Ji H, Wei Y, Wu N, Zuo B, Wang Q (2005) J
Catal 229:114
2. Wang X, Liang M, Liu H, Wang Y (2007) J Mol Catal A Chem
2
2
supported counterpart. It is has been clearly shown that the
Au deposition on a support during preparation is controlled
by the metal/support interaction, which in turn influences the
stability of the catalyst. Characterization results suggested a
2
73:160
23. Corma A, Boronat M, Gonz a´ lez S, Illas F (2007) Chem Commun
2:3371
2
2
3
4. Blaser HU (2006) Science 313:312–313
5. Gomez S, Torres C, Fierro JLG, Apesteguia CR, Reyes P (2012) J
Chil Chem Soc 57:1194
stronger metal/support interaction for the TiO -supported
2
catalysts compared to the silica-supported catalyst. No
preparation method used favored a complete Au deposition
26. Sangeetha P, Shanthi K, Rao KSR, Viswanathan B, Selvam P
2009) Appl Catal A 353:160
(
2
2
2
3
3
7. Relvas J, Andrade R, Freire FG, Lemos F, Ara u´ jo P, Pinho MJ,
Nunes CP, Ribeiro FR (2008) Catal Today 133–135:828
8. Nieto-M a´ rquez A, Valverde JL, Keane MA (2009) Appl Catal A
352:159
on SiO catalysts despite displaying reactivity in the NB
2
hydrogenation.
Reaction intermediates were found as products for all
the catalytic systems but it is important to mention that the
second step (formation of nitrosobenzene) is very fast and
in some cases this product was not detected.
9. Sangeetha P, Seetharamulu P, Shanthi K, Narayanan S, Rama
Rao KS (2007) J Mol Catal A Chem 273:244
0. Corma A, Serna P, P. C, Calvino JJ (2008) J Am Chem Soc
1
1. Corma A, Serna P (2006) Science 313:332
30:8748
Acknowledgments The authors thank the Project FONDECYT
1
32. Zhou J, Ralston J, Sedev R, Beattie DA, Col J (2009) Int Sci
331:251–262
100259 for funding this research. C. Torres and C. Campos are
1
23