1
12
M. Di Serio et al. / Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 239 (2005) 111–115
(
d) distillation refining method [5]: free fatty acids are dis-
acetate as catalyst [7]. They showed that this catalyst, operat-
◦
−3
tilled away from the oil;
ing in a temperature range 200–250 C and with 5 × 10 :1
weight ratio of catalyst to oil, can be used in the presence of a
high FFA concentration, obtaining after purification, a crude
ester phase a with very low FFA concentration and high con-
version of triglycerides. However, in other transesterification
reactions several acetates of bivalent metals have been used as
catalysts [8]. Since the activity of the catalysts is a function of
both metal acidity and ester and alcohol molecular structures,
every ester–alcohol couple will have a specific metal that will
give a maximum of activity [9]. Starting from these consid-
erations, this paper reports the results of a catalytic screening
of acetates of the following metals: Ca, Ba, Mg, Cd, Mn, Pb,
Zn, Co, Ni in the transesterification of the TG with methanol.
Moreover, the stearates of all the above metals were synthe-
sized and the influence of the molecular weight of catalyst
anion on the reaction have also been investigated. Further-
more, the influence of the presence of water and of FFA
respectively on the activity has been studied. Finally, we will
show the possibility to perform TG transesterification and
FFA esterification in a single step, using a low catalyst con-
centration. Amethodforremovingthemetalcatalysthasbeen
suggested.
(
e) pre-esterification method [2,5]: FFA are firstly esterified
to FAME by using an acid catalyst:
RCOOH + MeOH ꢀ RCOOMe + H2O
and then the transesterification is performed, as usual, by
using an alkaline catalyst;
f) use of Bronsted acid catalysts [3,6]: an esterification and
transesterification step are both promoted by a Bronsted
acid catalyst at high temperature.
(
All the first four methods (a–d) result in a loss of prod-
uct (biodiesel). Moreover, methods (a) and (b) give place
to problems during phase separation, method (a) before the
transesterification, method (b) after it because of the forma-
tion of emulsion due to the presence of soaps. Method (c)
requires a high solvent/oil weight ratio while methods (d)
and (e) require high energy use.
Methods (e) and (f) seems to be more attractive. The
acid-catalyzed pre-esterification of FFA – method (e) – is
a common practice in decreasing FFA levels in high FFA
feedstocks, before performing the base-catalyzed transester-
ification [3]. Zhang et al. [6] recently showed, by a techno-
logical assessment of different continuous processes, that the
acid-catalyzed process using waste oil is technically feasible
and less complex than two a step process (pre-esterification
with homogeneous acid catalyst and alkali catalyzed stages),
although no commercial biodiesel plants since the time of
their work have been reported to use the acid-catalyzed pro-
cess.
2. Experimental
2.1. Methods, techniques and reagents
The catalytic screening was performed in small stainless
steel vial reactors. The reaction was made by introducing
reagents (methanol and soybean oil with an acidity of 0.2%,
w/w) and a catalyst in each reactor. All reactor sets (6) were
then heated in a ventilated oven. The temperature of the
oven was increased from room temperature at a fixed rate
The main drawback of the pre-esterification method (e)
consists in the necessity to remove the homogeneous acid
catalyst from the oil after pre-esterification. This problem
can be solved with the use of an heterogeneous acid catalyst
◦
[3,4]. However, the necessity to eliminate the water formed in
(20 C/min) until reaching the reaction temperature of the
◦
FFA esterification still remains because the presence of water
may favour ester saponification under alkaline conditions
runs (150–200 C). Then, after 55 min the temperature was
quickly diminished by putting the vials in a cold bath. Exper-
imental runs were also made with the addition of water and
FFA to the reactants.
Acetates and the synthesized stearate of the following met-
als: Ca, Ba, Mg, Cd, Mn, Pb, Zn, Co, Ni were tested as
catalysts.
[
7].
The disadvantage of the acid-catalyzed process – method
f) – is that the reaction, normally, requires a high methanol
(
to oil molar ratio and high acid catalyst concentration. Zang
et al. [6] obtained a 97% oil conversion to FAME within
2
0
40 min, using a 50:1 molar ratio of methanol to oil and a
.14:1 weight ratio of sulphuric acid to oil at 80 C. How-
The syntheses of metal stearates were performed in a
magnetically stirred glass reactor. The jacketed reactor was
kept isothermal by recirculating a thermostated oil at 180 C.
The reactions were made by introducing a metal acetate
and stearic acid in stoichiometric amounts. The acetic acid
formed during the reaction (3 h) was stripped by a nitrogen
stream with flow rate 2 l/h and collected in a condenser. The
conversion obtained in the performed syntheses, reported in
Table 1, were calculated by measuring the amount of acetic
acid recovered.
◦
◦
ever, this process gives rise to problems linked with the
corrosive action of the liquid acid catalyst and to the high
quantity of obtained by-products [2]. Actually, a plant of
1
0,000 t/y of biodiesel co-produces 2000 t/y of CaSO4 [5]
with the sulphuric acid being neutralized with CaO. A solid
acid catalyst could to eliminate these problems but nowadays
the proposed catalysts have not yielded satisfactory results,
and much greater research efforts are necessary [2].
Basu and Norris proposed, as a possible solution to the
production of biodiesel from oil with a high FFA concen-
tration, the use of a mixture of calcium acetate and barium
The FAME yields, in the catalytic tests, were determined
using the H-NMR technique (Bruker 200 MHz) [10], i.e.,
measuring the area of H-NMR signal related to methoxylic