136
M. Sukwattanasinitt et al. / Carbohydrate Research 337 (2002) 133–137
Table 7
sis with six commercial enzymes (cellulase An, hemicel-
a
Effect of GlcNAc concentration on the production rate
lulase An, lipase An, pectinase An, cellulase Ac and
cellulase T6). The amorphous chitin and b-chitin con-
tained less than 1% ash content. The degrees of acetyla-
tion of the chitins determined from elemental analysis
Initial concentration of Yield of
GlcNAc (mg/mL)
Relative
production of
GlcNAc
GlcNAc
mg/mL)
b
(
were over 90%. The enzymes had protein (M \
W
0
4.9
4.6
4.1
4.0
100
94
84
10,000) content of around 10%. A typical reaction was
carried out by incubating a mixture of a known concen-
tration of enzyme and the substrate in a suitable buffer
2
5
8
.0
.0
.0
82
solution in the presence of NaN (500 ppm) preserva-
3
tive at 37 °C. The exact set of conditions for each
experiment was specified in the footnote of the table. At
each time point, a portion of the reaction mixture was
a
The reaction was carried out by using 9:1 cellulase
A:pectinase An mixed enzymes and b-chitin in citrate–phos-
phate buffer pH 3. [E]=10 mg/mL [S]=10 mg/mL at 37 °C.
b
sampled, diluted with water, then mixed with CH CN
The relative production of GlcNAc in the presence of x
3
mg/mL GlcNAc was calculated from 100×Yield /Yield .
(at the ratio of 30:70, v/v), filtered, and analyzed by
x
0
HPLC (column: Shodex Asahipak NH P-50; flow rate:
2
1
mL/min; mobile phase: 3:7 water–CH CN; detection:
3
gated by carrying out the reaction in the presence of
GlcNAc intentionally added in various concentrations
at the beginning of the reaction. The results showed
that the production rate decreased by less than 5%
when the initial concentration of GlcNAc was 2 mg/mL
UV at 210 nm). The amounts of GlcNAc and [Glc-
NAc] in the reaction mixtures were determined from
the calibration lines of the corresponding standards.
The percentage yields of GlcNAc or [GlcNAc] were
calculated based on the number of moles of the prod-
ucts produced against the number of moles of such
units presented in the starting chitin.
2
2
(
Table 7), which was the average concentration range in
the previous experiment. The results clearly indicated
that the product inhibition was the only minor cause of
the reduction in the production rate. However, enzyme
denaturation should not be the only reason accounting
for the rest of the rate decline since the rate looked
rather constant after 8 days (Table 6). We speculated
that the chitin substrate itself maybe the main reason
for the decrease in the GlcNAc production rate. The
substrate, b-chitin from squid pen, must contain both
amorphous and crystalline domains integrated in the
materials. The amorphous domains of the b-chitin par-
ticle are far more susceptible to enzymatic hydrolysis
than the crystalline domains. The hydrolysis rate was
thus faster at the beginning and slowed down as less of
the amorphous volume remained in the substrate.
Nonetheless, the b-chitin used mostly in this study
showed hydrolytic susceptibility to cellulase Ac notably
Acknowledgements
This work was sponsored by the Thailand–Japan
Technology Transfer Project (TJTTP) under the Over-
sea Economy Cooperation Fund (OECF), Agency of
Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) under the
Institute for Transfer of Industrial Technology (ITIT)
Fellowship Program, and Japan International Science
and Technology Exchange Center (JISTEC) under the
Science and Technology Agency (STA) Fellowship. We
also would like to thank Sunfive Co. for providing
b-chitin powder, Meiji Seika Co. for providing cellulase
Ac, and Amano Enzyme, Inc. for providing all other
enzymes used in this work.
7
higher than the more natural abundant a-chitin, but
comparable to the amorphous base-regenerated chitin.
In summary, the studies described here have shown the
potential use of some commercial non-chitinase en-
zymes from fungi for a convenient preparation of Glc-
NAc from b-chitin. We are currently developing a
simple and low-cost process for preparation of GlcNAc
References
1. Talent, J. M.; Gracy, R. W. Clin. Ther. 1996, 18, 1184–
1
190.
. Salvatore, S. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2000, 14, 1567–
579.
. Gindzienski, A.; Zwierz, K.; Rozanski, A. Biochem. Med.
971, 5, 188–194.
. Inouye, Y.; Onodera, K.; Kitaoka, S.; Hirano, S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1956, 78, 4722–4724.
2
3
4
5
6
and [GlcNAc] at multigram scale using b-chitin and
2
1
these commercial enzymes from fungi.
1
3. Experimental
. Haynes, C. A.; Aloise, P.; Creagh, A. L. US Patent 5 998
173, 1999.
Amorphous chitin or b-chitin powder (particle size 3
. Sashiwa, H.; Yamano, N.; Fujishima, S.; Kawasaki, N.;
Nakayama, A.; Sakamoto, K.; Hisato, O.; Nishikata, Y.;
mm) or [GlcNAc] were used as a substrate for hydroly-
2