C. Carboni et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 9649–9652
9651
The results in Table 1 also clearly indicate that the acyl-
Acknowledgements
ation of the aromatic D-amino acids methyl esters is
slower. This is in agreement with the structural basis
of PGA enantio-discrimination which was reported in
our previous study.8 Computational investigation of
the PGA active site demonstrated that in the case of
the bulkier aromatic amino acids the stabilising effect
of H-bonds between the acyl group and the PGA aminic
sub-site effectively occurs only with the L-enantiomer,
thus inducing enantio-discrimination. This is not the
case with the smaller aliphatic amino acids, where both
enantiomers can be accommodated inside the aminic
sub-site so to acquire a conformation able to engage sta-
bilising H-bonds with the active site. Thus, these theo-
retical calculations excellently explain the much lower
reactivity of the aromatic D-amino acids compared to
the aliphatic ones.
We are grateful to Boehringer–Mannheim for the gener-
ous gift of PGA-450. We further greatly acknowledge
Professor Cynthia Ebert and Dr. Alessandra Basso for
useful discussions and Mr. Luca Boscarol for the prep-
aration of the D-amino acids methyl esters.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be
ods for enzyme dehydration as also reported in Ref.
17; procedure for the determination of enzyme activity
as also described in Ref. 17; procedure for the determin-
ation of the water activity as also described in Ref. 17;
chemical synthesis of the D-amino acids methyl esters
starting from the corresponding D-amino acids, as also
described in Ref. 20; preparation of the free amines
starting from the corresponding hydrochloride salts.
The difference in activities cannot be ascribed simply to
solubility differences of the substrates since, for instance,
D-SerOMe, which is the most polar and least soluble
among the substrates considered, is completely acylated
in 24h even in dichloromethane, which had been demon-
strated to be a less efficient solvent than toluene.17 Final-
ly, early studies on PGA had already demonstrated that
the lower reactivity of the D-enantiomer was not ascrib-
able to an inhibitory effect on PGA but only to kinetic
factors.15
References and notes
1. Jakubke, H. D.; Kuhl, P.; Ko¨nnecke, A. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1985, 24, 85–93.
2. (a) Waldmann, H.; Sebastian, D. Chem. Rev. 1994, 911–
937, and references cited therein; (b) Fuganti, C.; Gras-
selli, P.; Casati, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 3191–3194.
3. Kreil, G. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1997, 66, 337–345, and
references cited therein.
It should be noted that in the case of D-TyrOMe and
D-PheOMe the higher enantioselectivity of PGA for the
L-enantiomers can be partially overcome by speeding
up the enzymatic acylation through a temperature incre-
ase to 40 or 50ꢁC, respectively.
4. Basso, A.; Biffi, S.; De Martin, L.; Ebert, C.; Gardossi, L.;
Linda, P. Croat. Chem. Acta 2001, 74, 757–762.
5. Didzˇiapetris, R.; Drabnig, B.; Schellenberger, V.;
Secondly, we investigated whether N-phenylacetyl-D-
amino acids methyl esters could also be smoothly and
quantitatively deprotected in aqueous solution using
immobilised PGA from both E. coli (PGA-450) and A.
faecalis. This latter amidase was selected because of
the very high specific activity of its immobilised form
(1390U/g compared to 155U/g of PGA-450) in order
to increase the very low reaction rates which were ex-
pected for the hydrolytic reactions in aqueous medium.
Furthermore, recent computational studies pointed out
some important structural differences at the level of
the aminic sub-site which induce to expect a wider sub-
strate tolerance.24 For the substrates tested (N-phenyl-
acetyl-D-AlaOMe and N-phenylacetyl-D-PheOMe) the
deprotection in buffered aqueous solution was complete
within 24h and 48h, respectively, demonstrating the
practical potential of the N-phenylacetyl protecting
group for D-amino acids, for instance in peptide
synthesis.25
ˇ
Jakubke, H.-D.; Svedas, V. K. FEBS 1991, 287, 31–33.
6. Duggleby, H. J.; Tolley, S. P.; Hill, C. P.; Dodson, E. J.;
Dodson, G.; Moody, P. C. E. Nature 1995, 373, 264–268.
7. McVey, C. E.; Walsh, M. A.; Dodson, G. G.; Wilson, K.
S.; Brannigan, J. A. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 313, 139–150.
8. Basso, A.; Braiuca, P.; Clementi, S.; Ebert, C.; Gardossi,
L.; Linda, P. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2002, 19–20, 423–
430.
9. Waldmann, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 3057–3058.
10. Rossi, D.; Calcagni, A.; Romeo, A. J. Org. Chem. 1979,
44, 2222–2225.
11. Zmijewski, M.; Briggs, B. S.; Thompson, A. R.; Wright, I.
G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 1621–1622.
12. (a) Bossi, A.; Cretich, M.; Righetti, P. G. Biotechnol.
Bioeng. 1998, 60, 454–461; (b) Fernandez-Lafuente, R.;
Rosell, C. M.; Guisan, J. M. Enzyme Microb. Technol.
1998, 22, 583–587.
ˇ
13. Didzˇiapetris, R.; Svedas, V. Biomed. Biochim. Acta 1991,
10/11, 237–242.
ˇ
14. Svedas, V. K.; Savchenko, M. V.; Beltser, A. I.; Gurunda,
D. F. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1996, 799, 659–669.
15. Pessina, A.; Luthi, P.; Luisi, P. L. Helv. Chim. Acta 1988,
71, 631–641.
16. Basso, A.; De Martin, L.; Ebert, C.; Gardossi, L.; Linda,
P. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 1999, 6, 437–445.
17. Basso, A.; De Martin, L.; Ebert, C.; Gardossi, L.; Linda,
P.; Zlatev, V. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym. 2001, 11, 851–855.
18. Basso, A.; Braiuca, P.; De Martin, L.; Ebert, C.; Gardossi,
L.; Linda, P. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 1789–
1796.
In conclusion, a fast, efficient and versatile method was
developed for the protection of D-amino acids esters by
exploiting the lower enantioselectivity displayed by
PGA in organic media. The procedure is of practical
importance due to the absence of hydrolytic side prod-
ucts and the easy work-up. The results obtained are in
agreement with previously reported theoretical
calculations.