Phenylethenyl-Substituted Triphenylamines
FULL PAPER
of 10 KminÀ1 under a nitrogen atmosphere. The Tg values for the investi-
gated compounds were determined during the second heating scan.
by illumination with pulses of a nitrogen laser (pulse duration=2 ns, l=
337 nm). The layer surface potential decrease as a result of pulse illumi-
nation was up to 1–5% of the initial potential before illumination. The
capacitance probe that was connected to the wide-frequency band elec-
trometer measured the speed of the surface potential decrease (dU/dt).
The transit time (tt) was determined by the kink on the curve of the
dU/dt transient on a linear or double logarithmic scale. The drift mobility
was calculated by the formula m=d2/U0tt (d is the layer thickness, U0 is
the surface potential at the moment of illumination).
Optical measurements: Absorption spectra of the dilute solutions in THF
were recorded on
a UV/Vis–NIR spectrophotometer, Lambda 950
(Perkin–Elmer). Fluorescence of the investigated compounds as PS- or
neat films was initiated by a light-emitting diode (l=365 nm; Nichia
NSHU590-B) and measured by using a back-thinned charge-coupled
device (CCD) spectrophotometer PMA-11 (Hamamatsu). For these
measurements, a dilute solution of the required compound was prepared
by dissolution in spectral-grade toluene (c=1ꢁ10À5 m). PS films with con-
centrations that ranged from 0.1–100 wt% were prepared by mixing the
dissolved compound with a solution of PS in toluene at the appropriate
ratio and casting the solutions on quartz substrates under ambient condi-
tions. Drop casting from solutions in toluene (1ꢁ10À3 m) was also em-
ployed to prepare neat films of the compounds. The FF of the solutions
were estimated by comparison of the wavelength-integrated photolumi-
nescence (PL) intensity of the compound solutions to that of quinine sul-
fate in a 0.1m aqueous solution of H2SO4 (FF =53Æ2.3) as a reference.[24]
Optical densities of the reference and sample solutions were kept below
0.05 to avoid reabsorption effects. Estimated quantum yields of the com-
pound solutions were verified by using the integrated-sphere method.[25]
An integrating sphere (Sphere Optics) coupled to the CCD spectrometer
by optical fiber was also employed to measure the FF of the neat and PS
films. Fluorescence transients of the samples were measured by using a
time-correlated single-photon-counting system PicoHarp 300 (Pico-
Quant), which utilizes a semiconductor diode laser (repetition rate=
1 MHz, pulse duration=70 ps, lemission =375 nm) as an excitation source.
Construction of the organic photoreceptor: Hole-transporting material
TPD was purchased from Sigma–Aldrich. The samples of electrophoto-
graphic layers were prepared on PS film substrates with a conducting Al
layer and CGL (0.5 mm thickness) composed of 2:1 mass proportion com-
position of titanyl phthalocyanine ELA7051 (H. W. Sands Co.) and poly-
vinyl butyral BX-1 (Sekisui). The HTM layers were coated by the doctor-
blade method from the 1:1 mass proportion mixtures of the transporting
materials and polycarbonate Z-200 (Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Co.) dis-
solved in THF. After coating, the samples were heated at 808C for 1 h to
dry. The thickness of the transporting layers was approximately 8 mm.
The electrophotographic parameters of the samples were measured as
described in the literature.[26]
General synthetic procedure: The appropriate triarylamine was dissolved
in toluene (20 mLgÀ1+volume of the Dean–Stark trap), CSA (1.0 equiv)
was added, and the mixture was heated at reflux for 20 min. Afterwards,
the required phenylacetaldehyde (1.2 equiv per reactive functional
group) was added, and heating at reflux was continued in apparatus
fitted with a Dean–Stark trap. After termination of the reaction, the mix-
ture was extracted with toluene. The organic layer was dried over anhy-
drous MgSO4, filtered, the solvent was removed, and the residue purified
by column chromatography.
CV measurements: The electrochemical studies were carried out by a
three-electrode assembly cell from Bio-Logic SAS and a micro-AUTO-
LAB Type III potentiostat–galvanostat. The measurements were carried
out with a glassy carbon electrode in dichloromethane solutions that con-
tained tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (0.1m) as the electro-
lyte, Ag/AgNO3 as the reference electrode, and a Pt wire counter elec-
trode. Each measurement was calibrated with ferrocene (Fc). Oxidation
Compound 1b: TPA (0.5 g, 2.04 mmol), CSA (0.47 g, 2.04 mmol), and
bis(4-methoxyphenyl)acetaldehyde (1.88 g, 7.34 mmol) were used (reac-
tion time=10 h). After extraction (toluene), the crude product was puri-
fied by column chromatography (2:23 acetone/n-hexane) to give 1b
(1.5 g, 77%) as a bright-yellow powder. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3,
258C, TMS): d=7.34–6.73 (m, 35H), 6.67 (d, J=7.2 Hz, 4H), 3.87–
3.68 ppm (m, 18H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3, 258C, TMS): d=145.7,
140.4, 136.7, 133.2, 132.5, 131.8, 131.6, 130.9, 130.4, 128.8, 128.3, 126.4,
125.9, 124.5, 124.0, 123.6, 114.3, 113.7, 113.6, 55.4 ppm; elemental analysis
calcd (%) for C66H57NO6: C 82.56, H 5.98, N 1.46; found: C 82.43, H
5.85, N 1.59.
potentials were obtained as an average value between each anodic (pa)
red=ox
1=2
and corresponding cathodic potential (pc) [E
=1/2ACHTUNGETRN(NUG Epc+Epa)]. The
optical bandgaps (Eogpt [eV]) were estimated from the edges of the elec-
tronic absorption spectra, ELUMO values by using the equation ELUMO
EHOMOÀEg.
=
Ionization-potential measurements: The ionization potential (Ip) of the
layers of the synthesized compounds was measured by electron photoem-
ission in air.[22] The samples were prepared by dissolution in CHCl3 and
the solutions were coated on Al plates pre-coated with approximately
0.5 mm thickness of a methylmethacrylate and methacrylic acid copoly-
mer adhesive layer. The thickness of the transporting material layer was
0.5–1 mm. The organic materials investigated are stable enough to oxygen
that the measurements may be carried out in the presence of air. The
samples were illuminated with monochromatic light from a quartz mono-
chromator fitted with a deuterium lamp. The power of the incident light
beam was 2–5ꢁ10À8 W. A negative voltage (À300 V) was supplied to the
sample substrate. The counter electrode with a 4.5ꢁ15 mm2 slit for illu-
mination was placed 8 mm from the sample surface. The counter elec-
trode was connected to the input of the BK2–16 type electrometer, work-
ing in the open input regime, for the photocurrent measurement. A
10À15–10À12 A photocurrent (I) flowed in the circuit under illumination.
The value of I is strongly dependent on the incident-light photon energy
(hn). The dependence I0.5 on incident-light quanta energy hn was plotted
from the experiment results. Usually the dependence of I on the incident
light quantum energy is described well by the linear relationship between
I0.5 and hn near the threshold.[22b,c] The linear part of this dependence was
extrapolated to the hn axis and the Ip value was determined as the
photon energy at the interception point.
Compound 2b: 4-Methyltriphenylamine (0.5 g, 1.93 mmol), CSA (0.45 g,
1.93 mmol), and bis(4-methoxyphenyl)acetaldehyde (1.19 g, 4.63 mmol)
were used (reaction time=6 h). After extraction (toluene), the crude
product was purified by column chromatography (3:22 acetone/n-hexane)
to give 2b (0.99 g, 70%) as a bright-yellow powder. 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3, 258C, TMS): d=7.29–6.94 (m, 16H), 6.92–6.84 (m, 4H), 6.82 (s,
2H), 6.80–6.74 (m, 8H), 3.81–3.72 (m, 12H), 2.31–2.27 ppm (m, 3H);
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3, 258C, TMS): d=159.2, 158.3, 146.1, 144.8,
140.1, 137.9, 136.8, 133.2, 131.6, 130.8, 130.2, 128.7, 128.2, 125.9, 125.6,
123.2, 122.7, 114.3, 113.8, 113.6, 55.4, 21.1 ppm; elemental analysis calcd
(%) for C51H45NO4: C 83.24, H 6.16, N 1.90; found: C 83.39, H 6.07, N
1.72.
Compound 3b: 4,4ꢂ-Dimethyltriphenylamine (0.5 g, 1.83 mmol), CSA
(0.42 g, 1.83 mmol), and bis(4-methoxyphenyl)acetaldehyde (0.56 g,
2.2 mmol) were used (reaction time=6 h). After extraction (toluene), the
crude product was purified by column chromatography (3:22 acetone/n-
hexane) to give 3b (0.7 g, 75%) as a bright-yellow powder. M.p. 167–
1698C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3, 258C, TMS): d=7.23 (d, J=8.9 Hz,
2H), 7.13 (d, J=8.7 Hz, 2H), 6.99 (dd, J=22.7, 8.4 Hz, 8H), 6.91–6.71
(m, 9H), 3.80 (d, J=6.5 Hz, 6H), 2.28 ppm (s, 6H); 13C NMR (75 MHz,
CDCl3, 258C, TMS): d=159.1, 159.0, 146.7, 145.2, 139.7, 136.8, 133.3,
132.8, 131.6, 131.0, 130.2, 130.0, 128.7, 126.1, 125.0, 121.5, 114.3, 113.7,
55.4, 21.0 ppm; elemental analysis calcd (%) for C36H33NO2: C 84.51, H
6.50, N 2.74; found: C 84.34, H 6.63, N 2.89.
Hole-drift-mobility measurements: The samples for the hole-drift-mobili-
ty measurements were prepared by spin coating solutions of the synthe-
sized compounds in toluene onto PS films with a conductive Al layer.
The layer thickness was in the range 5–10 mm. The hole drift mobility
was measured by XTOF.[17] An electric field was created by positive
corona charging. The charge carriers were generated at the layer surface
Compound 1c: TPA (0.5 g, 2.04 mmol), CSA (0.47 g, 2.04 mmol), and 2-
phenylpropionaldehyde (0.98 g, 7.34 mmol) were used (reaction time=
5 h). After extraction (toluene), the crude product was purified by
Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 15044 – 15056
ꢀ 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
15055