1
N-[(2-Hydroxydibenzofuran-1-yl)(4-methoxyphenyl)methyl)-3-methylbenzamide: H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 2.42 (s, 3H,
CH3), 3.77 (s, 3H, OCH3), 6.97 (d, 2H, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.03 (d, 1H, J = 8.5 Hz, CH), 7.11-7.36 (m, 6H), 7.44 (t, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.63 (d,
1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.70 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.75 (d, 1H, J = 8.3 Hz), 7.91-7.96 (m, 2H), 8.74 (d, 1H, J = 8.5 Hz, NH), 10.05 (s, 1H, OH);
13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 21.0, 55.9, 57.0, 111.8, 112.4, 114.1, 119.6, 119.9, 122.5, 122.9, 124.6, 125.3, 127.4, 127.7, 128.5,
128.7, 130.6, 130.9, 135.8, 137.7, 142.7, 154.1, 155.6, 156.9, 160.6, 167.1; Calcd. for C28H23NO4: C, 76.87; H, 5.30; N, 3.20, Found:
C, 77.06; H, 5.42; N, 3.35.
N-[(2-Hydroxydibenzofuran-1-yl)(3-nitrophenyl)methyl)-3-methylbenzamide: 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 2.43 (s, 3H, CH3),
7.08 (d, 1H, J = 8.5 Hz, CH), 7.14 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.20 (t, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.27 (t, 1H, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.35 (d, 1H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.43-
7.46 (m, 2H), 7.63 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.70 (d, 1H, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.75 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.89-7.95 (m, 3H), 8.06 (s, 1H), 8.21 (d, 1H,
J = 7.9 Hz), 8.81 (d, 1H, J = 8.5 Hz, NH), 10.15 (s, 1H, OH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 21.2, 57.6, 111.9, 112.6, 119.7,
119.9, 122.6, 122.9, 124.7, 124.9, 125.5, 125.8, 127.0, 127.5, 127.9, 128.4, 128.7, 129.0, 130.8, 135.8, 137.7, 139.8, 145.3, 153.8,
155.3, 156.9, 167.2; Calcd. for C27H20N2O5: C, 71.67; H, 4.46; N, 6.19, Found: C, 71.78; H, 4.59; N, 6.34.
1
N-[(2-Hydroxydibenzofuran-1-yl)(4-bromophenyl)methyl)-3-methylbenzamide: H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 2.42 (s, 3H,
CH3), 7.04 (d, 1H, J = 8.6 Hz, CH), 7.14 (d, 1H, J = 8.3 Hz), 7.18-7.37 (m, 7H), 7.44 (t, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.63 (d, 1H, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.69-
7.75 (m, 2H), 7.89-7.93 (m, 2H), 8.79 (d, 1H, J = 8.6 Hz, NH), 9.96 (s, 1H, OH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 21.3, 57.3, 111.8,
112.3, 119.6, 119.9, 122.5, 122.9, 124.5, 124.9, 125.4, 127.6, 127.7, 128.6, 128.9, 129.2, 130.4, 131.6, 135.8, 137.7, 142.7, 153.9,
155.4, 156.9, 167.3; Calcd. for C27H20BrNO3: C, 66.68; H, 4.14; N, 2.88, Found: C, 76.85; H, 4.29; N, 3.01.
1
N-[(2-Hydroxydibenzofuran-1-yl)(3-nitrophenyl)methyl)benzamide: H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.07 (d, 1H, J = 8.6 Hz,
CH), 7.14 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.19-7.28 (m, 2H), 7.46 (d, 1H, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.51-7.64 (m, 4H), 7.69-7.76 (m, 2H), 7.87-7.92 (m, 3H),
8.04 (s, 1H), 8.21 (d, 1H, J = 7.9 Hz), 8.86 (d, 1H, J = 8.5 Hz, NH), 10.21 (s, 1H, OH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 57.5, 111.8,
112.5, 119.5, 119.8, 122.5, 122.8, 124.7, 124.8, 125.6, 125.9, 127.0, 127.6, 127.9, 128.6, 128.7, 129.1, 135.2, 139.5, 145.4, 153.8,
155.2, 156.8, 167.0; Calcd. for C26H18N2O5: C, 71.23; H, 4.14; N, 6.39, Found: C, 71.41; H, 4.39; N, 6.47 .
1
N-[(2-Hydroxydibenzofuran-1-yl)(4-bromophenyl)methyl)benzamide: H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 7.05 (d, 1H, J = 8.5 Hz,
CH), 7.13 (d, 1H, J = 8.2 Hz), 7.18-7.41 (m, 6H), 7.52-7.75 (m, 6H), 7.88 (d, 2H, J = 7.8 Hz), 8.65 (d, 1H, J = 8.5 Hz, NH), 9.84 (s,
1H, OH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 57.6, 111.9, 112.5, 119.6, 119.9, 122.5, 122.9, 124.3, 124.7, 125.4, 127.4, 127.8, 128.8,
128.9 (2C), 131.6, 134.9, 143.0, 153.8, 155.7, 156.9, 167.2; Calcd. for C26H18BrNO3: C, 66.11; H, 3.84; N, 2.97, Found: C, 66.26; H,
3.95; N, 3.11.
N-[(2-Hydroxydibenzofuran-1-yl)(4-bromophenyl)methyl)acetamide: 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 2.01 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.91 (d,
1H, J = 8.4 Hz, CH), 7.13 (d, 1H, J = 8.3 Hz), 7.19 (t, 1H, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.28 (t, 1H, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.35-7.41 (m, 4H), 7.63 (d, 1H, J = 7.9
Hz), 7.70-7.75 (m, 2H), 8.24 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, NH), 9.14 (s, 1H, OH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 23.3, 57.0, 111.9, 112.6,
119.5, 119.8, 122.5, 122.7, 124.3, 124.8, 125.6, 127.7, 128.9, 131.7, 142.8, 153.9, 155.7, 156.9, 169.4; Calcd. for C21H16BrNO3: C,
61.48; H, 3.93; N, 3.41, Found: C, 61.66; H, 4.11; N, 3.59.
3. Results and discussion
In order to determine the crystalline structure and phase composition of the Ba3(PO4)2 nano-powder, X-ray diffraction (XRD)
analysis using Cu-Kα radiation was applied (Fig. 1). The XRD pattern of Ba3(PO4)2 nano-powder exhibited diffraction pattern
characteristics of the tetragonal structure with pronounced 18.32, 26.47, 28.82, 32.77, 38.17, 38.52, 42.22, 43.42, 48.27, 48.72, 52.77
and 54.57 peaks (Fig. 1). The average crystallite diameter of the as prepared powder was determined by XRD, using the highest peak
of the Ba3(PO4)2 phase, according to the Scherrer equation. The average crystalline size estimated at 80 nm.
The average crystalline size of the Ba3(PO4)2 nano-powder was characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-
SEM). Fig. 2 shows the FE-SEM micrographs of the Ba3(PO4)2 nano-particles. Based on the FE-SEM observation, the Ba3(PO4)2 nano-
particles contain spherical or ellipsoidal shapes. The particle sizes were mainly distributed in the range of 60-200 nm. The size of about
50 particles of Ba3(PO4)2 was measured and the average particle size was obtained as 85 nm.
The dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis was used to determine the particle size distribution of Ba3(PO4)2 nano-powder. Fig. 3
shows grain size distributions of Ba3(PO4)2 nano-powders. The powder milled for 2 h and sonicated in ethanol for 1 h had monomodal
distributions with median particle size of 88 nm.
In order to introduce the application of Ba3(PO4)2 nanopowders in organic synthesis, the preparation of 1-amidoalkyl-2-naphthol
derivatives was investigated, and as a preliminary test reaction, catalytic three-component reaction of bezaldehyde, 2-naphthol and an
acetamide in the presence of Ba3(PO4)2 nanopowder as a catalyst was examined (Scheme 1). Ba3(PO4)2 nanopowder exhibited high
activity and the corresponding product was produced in high yield (Table 1). The use of bulk commercial Ba3(PO4)2 instead of
Ba3(PO4)2 nanopowder in the test reaction gives the product in lower yield (72%) under the same reaction condition as solvent-free,
catalyst (0.083 mmol), T = 100 °C, time: 45 min. The higher surface area of Ba3(PO4)2 nanopowder is the reason for better catalytic
activities than those of bulk material.
To optimize the reaction conditions, the reaction was carried out using different solvents (Table 1, entries 2-7) or solvent-free
condition (Table 1, entry 1). It was found that solvent-free is the best conditions of the reaction in terms of reaction times and yields
(Table 1, entry 1). Polar solvents gave a low yield of product, but non-polar solvents did not affect the reaction, and no yield of product
was obtained in non-polar media.
Page 4 of 10