JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH 2013 465
Table 2 Preparation of the 1-substituted tetrazoles (2a–k) by reaction of different amines (1a–k) with sodium azide and triethyl
b
c
3 2
orthoformate in the presence of FeCl –SiO under conventional conditions or ultrasound irradiation
Entry
1
R in R–NH
2
R in 1-substituted 1H-1,2,3,4-tetrazoles
-2a
Time/h
Yield/%a
Ref.
2.30b
95 , 92
b
d
7, 19
C
6
H
5
-1a
6 5
C H
c
c
2.0
96
b
c
b
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3-H
4-H
2-H
4-ClC
2-ClC
4-BrC
3-F CC
4-H CCOC
2,4-(H
3
CC
CC
CC
6
H
4
-1b
3-H
4-H
2-H
4-ClC
2-ClC
4-BrC
3-F CC
4-H CCOC
2,4-(H C)
3
CC
CC
CC
6
H
4
-2b
2.45
.45
90
7
7, 19
19
c
1
92
b
c
b
3
6
H
4
-1c
-1d
-1e
3
6
H
4
-2c
-2d
-2e
2.15
.45
85
c
1
92
b
b
3
6
H
4
3
6
H
4
3.0
75
c
b
c
c
2.30
79
b
6
H
4
6
H
4
2.45
93
7, 19
7
c
1
.30
95
b
b
6
H
4
-1f
6
H
4
-2f
3.0
79
c
c
2.15
83
b
c
b
6
H
4
-1g
6
H
4
-2g
2.45
85
23
c
2.00
89
b
c
b
3
6
H
4
-1h
-1i
-1j
3
6
H
4
-2h
-2i
-2j
2.30
.45
84
23
c
1
89
b
c
b
3
6
H
4
3
6
H
4
2.45
.45
87
19
c
1
2.30
89
b
c
b
1
1
0
1
3
C)
2
C
6
H
3
3
2
C
6
H
3
76
23
c
2
.00
.30
82
b
c
b
3
71
c
2-H
2
NC
6
H
4
-1k
3.00
74
23
2k
a
Yield refers to the pure isolated product.
Under thermal conditions at 130 °C.
Under ultrasound irradiation conditions at 45 °C.
Yield after the third cycle.
b
c
d
3 2 3
Table 3 Comparison of FeCl –SiO with AcOH, ionic liquid and Yb(OTf) in synthesis of 1-phenyl-1H-1,2,3,4-tetrazole (2a)
Entry
Catalyst
Amine:orthoformate:sodium azide:catalyst mol %, reaction conditions
Time
Yield/%
1
2
3
4
AcOH
1:3:1.1:70 %, AcOH, reflux, recrystallisation
2.5 h
6 h
25 min
90 min
85
85
89
95
Yb(OTf)
3
3 2 4
1:1.2:1:20 %, CH OC H OH, 100 °C, recrystallisation
Ionic liquid
FeCl –SiO
3 2
1:1.2:1:30 %, Ionic liquid, 100 °C, column chromatography
2:2.4:2:20 %, Solvent-free, 130 °C, recrystallisation
Experimental
combined organic layers were washed with brine and dried over
anhydrous Na SO . After concentration, the product was crystallised
from EtOAc–hexane to afford the pure product.
All reagents were purchased from the Merck and Aldrich chemical
companies and used without further purification. Products were
characterised by spectroscopy data (FT-IR, H NMR and C NMR
spectra), elemental analysis (CHN) and melting points. The NMR
spectra were recorded in DMSO and CDCl . H NMR spectra were
2
4
1
13
The products were characterised by spectroscopic methods,
elemental analysis (CHN) and melting points and the physical data
of known compounds were found to be identical with those reported
1
3
7
13
in the literature. C NMR spectra displayed signals about δ = 147–
recorded on a Bruker Avance DRX 90 MHz instrument. The chemical
shifts (δ) are reported in ppm relative to the TMS as internal standard
1
9
1
57 ppm for C5 of tetrazole ring.
1-Phenyl-1H-1,2,3,4-tetrazole (2a, Table 2, entry 1): M.p. 65–
13
and J values are given in Hz. C NMR spectra were recorded at
2.5 Hz. FT-IR (KBr) spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer 781
spectrophotometer. Ultrasonication was performed in a PARSONIC
600s ultrasound cleaner with a frequency of 28 kHz and an output
7
1
6
6 °C (lit: 64–65 °C) ; H NMR (90 MHz, CDCl ): δ = 7.39–6.99 (m,
3
2
4
H), 8.21 (s, 1H).
1
-(3-Methylphenyl)-1H-1,2,3,4-tetrazole (2b, Table 2, entry 2):
2
7 1
M.p. 53–55 °C (lit: 53–54 °C) ; H NMR (90 MHz, CDCl ): δ = 2.30
3
power of 50 W (Builtin heating, 20–70 °C thermostatically adjust-
able). Melting points were taken in open capillary tubes with a BUCHI
(
s, 3H), 6.82–7.19 (m, 4H), 8.19 (s, 1H).
-(4-Methylphenyl)-1H-1,2,3,4-tetrazole (2c, Table 2, entry 3):
1
5
10 melting point apparatus and were uncorrected. The elemental
7
1
M.p. 94–95 °C (lit: 93–94 °C) ; H NMR (90 MHz, CDCl ): δ = 2.30
3
analysis was performed using Heraeus CHN–O-Rapid analyser. TLC
was performed on silica gel polygram SIL G/UV 254 plates.
(
s, 3H), 6.92–7.27 (m, 4H), 8.16 (s, 1H).
-(2-Methylphenyl)-1H-1,2,3,4-tetrazole (2d, Table 2, entry 4):
1
22
1
21
M.p. 153–155 °C (lit: 153–155 °C) ; H NMR (90 MHz, CDCl ):
Preparation of FeCl –SiO catalyst
3
3
2
δ = 3.38 (s, 3H), 6.88–7.17 (m, 4H), 7.87 (s, 1H).
Silica gel (10 g, 70–230 mesh) was added to a solution of ferric
chloride hexahydrate (1.2 g) in acetone (16 mL), at room temperature.
The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and the resulting
yellow powder was kept under nitrogen at room temperature for
further reactions.
1
-(4-Chlorophenyl)-1H-1,2,3,4-tetrazole (2e, Table 2, entry 5):
7
1
M.p. 156–158 °C (lit: 157–158 °C) ; H NMR (90 MHz, CDCl ):
3
δ = 6.96 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 7.28 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 8.09 (s, 1H).
1
-(2-Chlorophenyl)-1H-1,2,3,4-tetrazole (2f, Table 2, entry 6):
22
1
M.p. 127–131 °C (lit: 127–131 °C) ; H NMR (90 MHz, CDCl ):
3
Synthesis of the 1-aryl-1H-1,2,3,4-tetrazoles; typical procedure
δ = 7.10–7.44 (m, 4H), 8.07 (s, 1H).
FeCl –SiO (0.02 g) was added to a mixture of amine (2 mM), NaN
1-(4-Bromophenyl)-1H-1,2,3,4-tetrazole (2g, Table 2, entry 7):
3
2
3
22
1
(2 mM), triethyl orthoformate (2.4 mM) and stirred at 130 °C or soni-
M.p. 183–185 °C (lit: 183–185 °C) ; H NMR (90 MHz, CDCl ):
3
cated in an ultrasonic cleaner water bath at 45 °C for the appropriate
time (Table 2). After completion (as monitored by TLC), the reaction
mixture was diluted with cold water (5 mL) and extracted with ethyl
acetate (3×10 mL). The catalyst was removed by filtration and the
δ = 6.90 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.40 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 8.07 (s, 1H).
1-(3-Trifluoromethylphenyl)-1H-1,2,3,4-tetrazole (2h, Table 2,
22
1
entry 8): M.p. 125–127 °C (lit: 125–127 °C) ; H NMR (90 MHz,
DMSO–d ): δ = 7.60–7.20 (m, 4H), 8.19 (s, 1H).
6