9
72
J IRAN CHEM SOC (2012) 9:971–975
0
(
(
P680) and ultraviolet–visible light detector (UVD) system
170U). Diacovery C18 column was used for the HPLC
4,4 -Dinitrostilbene
analysis with a mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile and
methanol [11].
Yellow needles, mp 292–293 °C (lit [15]. mp
1
294–295 °C); H NMR (CDCl
.72 (s, 4H); 7.33 (m, 2H). IR (KBr): 3,109, 3,097, 3,087,
3,040, 1,606, 1,604, 1,594, 1,376, 1,342, 1,318, 1,274,
,259, 1,179, 1,110, 1,093, 976, 967, 862, 852, 821, 816,
-d6): d (ppm) 8.28 (s, 4H);
3
7
Experimental procedure
1
0
0
0
-1
2
,2 ,4,4 ,6,6 -Hexanitrobibenzyl (HNBB) was prepared by
767, 742, 696, 636, 516, 509, 476 [cm ].
1
the procedure given in the literature [12]. H NMR
0 0
4,4 -Dinitrostilbene-2,2 -disulfonic acid
(
DMSO-d6): d (ppm) 3.344 (s, 4H, CH ); 9.098 (s, 4H, Ar–
2
H). IR (KBr): 3,103, 2,888, 1,821, 1,641, 1,545, 1,468,
-
,356, 1,226, 1166, 1089, 916, 804, 710 [cm ].
1
1
1
mp 264–266 °C (lit [16] mp 266 °C); H NMR (CDCl
-
3
d6): d (ppm) 7.9 (d; 1H); 8.3 (d; 1H); 8.4 (s; 2H); 8.6 (s;
1H). IR (KBr): 3,400, 2,800, 1,664, 1,590, 1,576, 1,520,
1,484, 1,475, 1,350, 1,296, 1,140, 1,080, 976, 968, 876,
Representative procedure for the of dehydrogenation
HNBB
-
1
848, 752, 628 [cm ].
-
A mixture of HNBB (2.2 9 10 mol), TEMPO (1.3 9
3
-
4
-4
mol), and transition metal salts (1.4 9 10 mol) in
1
0
DMSO (15 mL) were added in a 50 mL four-neck round
flask equipped with magnetic stirring apparatus and water-
Results and discussion
bath. O was bubbled into the flask at the flow rate of
2
Direct dehydrogenation of HNBB to HNS
2
0 mL/h. The reaction mixture was stirred and then poured
into excess water. After standing for about 2 h to allow
formation of the precipitate, the solid formed was filtered
off. The crude product was washed with hot acetone and
dried (80 % yield). Then the product was analyzed by HPLC
and identified through comparison of the authentic sample.
The dehydrogenation of HNBB was chosen as a model
reaction (Scheme 1) and carried out in the presence of
catalytic amounts of TEMPO and metal salts under various
conditions (Table 1).
HNBB was allowed to react under O (1 atm) catalyzed
2
by TEMPO (6 mol %) and metal salts (6.5 mol %) in
DMSO (15 mL), leading to HNS in 80 % yield (Run 1).
When the reaction was carried out using lower amount of
TEMPO, the yield decreased (Runs 2 and 3). Removing of
TEMPO from the oxidation system resulted in 20 % yield
(Run 4) and the yield of HNS was only 10 % in the absence
of metal salts under these conditions (Run 5). The base
basically did not influence the yield (Run 18). Substitution
of TEMPO by 4-hydroxy-TEMPO led to a slightly lower
yield (Run 19). The oxidation of HNBB under air was also
examined and found to afford HNS in moderate yield
HNS
1
Yellow needles, mp 316–317 °C (lit [13] 318 °C).
NMR (DMSO-d ): d (ppm) 7.142 (s, 2H); 9.111 (s, 4H); IR
H
6
(
KBr): 3,102, 2,894, 1,610, 1,600, 1,534, 1,477, 1,341,
-
1
1
,268, 1,176, 1,075, 960, 917, 794, 722, 556, 514 [cm ].
In a similar way, the following nitro stilbenes were
obtained and characterized.
0 0
,2 ,4,4 -Tetranitrostilbene
2
(
Run 20).
1
Yellow needles, mp 268–269 °C (lit [14] 260 °C);
H
To optimize the yield of HNS, several metal salts co-
NMR (DMSO-d ): d (ppm) 8.81 (d, 2H); 8.62 (m, 2H);
catalysts were screened in combination with TEMPO. In
contrast to the relative catalytic activity of metal ion, the
decreasing order observed was: Fe(II) [ Cu(I) [ Zn(II) [
Co(II) [ Mn(II) [ Ni(II) [ Fe(III) [ Cu(II) (Run 1, Runs
6
8
1
7
.21 (m, 2H); 7.79 (s, 2H). IR (KBr): 3,201, 2,857, 1,606,
,596, 1,520, 1,450, 1,345, 1,224, 1,180, 1,056, 950, 920,
-
80, 710, 558, 510 [cm ].
1
7
–13). The catalytic activity of the transition metal was
0
2
,2 -Dinitrostilbene
mainly due to the fact that it could undergo an oxygen-
rebound reaction in which the transition metal served as a
relay for the oxygen atom transfer from the terminal oxi-
dant to the HNBB via an oxotransition metal reactive
intermediate. The transition metal in the reaction was
capable of readily undergoing one-electron changes [e.g.,
Fe(II) ? Fe(III) and Cu(I) ? Cu(II)] [17], however,
Ni(II), Fe(III) and Cu(II) were difficult to accept any
1
Yellow needles, mp 195–195.5 °C (lit [1] 196 °C); H
NMR (CDCl -d6): d (ppm) 7.50 (t, 2H); 7.58 (s, 2H); 7.70
3
(
t, 2H, H meta); 7.83 (dt, 2H); 8.06 (dt, 2H). IR (KBr):
3
1
6
,050, 2,840, 1,784, 1,636, 1,533, 1,443, 1,347, 1,328,
,290, 1,020, 996, 920, 892, 786, 775, 736, 708, 692, 636,
-
00, 472 [cm ].
1
1
23