Communications
tion by destabilizing the tertiary structure when located at
residues that populate the 2’-endo conformation in the folded
RNA.[2d,19,20] We observe no link between interference and
nucleoside analogues that preferentially populate the 2’-endo
conformation.[6,19] These sugar pucker preferences evidently
have little energetic influence on the DC209 P4-P6 tertiary
folding transition, which was monitored by using the electro-
phoretic mobility shift assay. We did not observe a link
between interference and the hydrophobic character of the
introduced substituent, though we cannot rule out the
possibility that hydrophobicity has some influence on tertiary
folding stability.[18] Overlapping molecular volumes exert the
most significant energetic force in biology, since the repulsive
energy between two atoms increases exponentially with the
inverse of the distance between the centers of the two
atoms.[21] Our observation that DC209 P4-P6 interferences
correlate with molecular volume is in agreement with this
relationship.
Figure 4. van der Waals repulsion determines the 2’-Cl/2’-CH3/2’-SH
In summary, we have synthesized 2’-chloro-, 2’-methyl-,
and 2’-sulfanylnucleoside-a-thiotriphosphates and have dem-
onstrated that T7 RNA polymerase efficiently incorporates
these compounds into RNA without sequence bias, which
renders interference mapping analysis possible. These nucleo-
side analogues span a narrow range of molecular volume
(DV= 1 0 3) and together provide a sensitive measure of the
spatial environment (the packing density) of a 2’-hydroxy
group within a structured RNA molecule. Many residues
within RNA bear nonfunctional hydroxy groups that reside
within the extensive packing interfaces formed by tertiary
folding. Our packing density metric (PDM) defines these
interfaces biochemically. PDM analysis may help to evaluate
the functional validity of crystallographic and biochemical
models of RNA structure and may reveal regions within RNA
that undergo structural changes whilst carrying out their
function.
interference profile. A) The dependence of van der Waals repulsion
energy on molecular volume. The interference profile for a given resi-
due matches its relative volume sensitivity. We used the Sybyl 6.9
molecular mechanics package[17] to calculate the change in van der
Waals energy upon introduction of variously sized atoms at the 2’-posi-
tion (O, Cl, S, Br). The calculation included all force potentials but
DC209 P4-P6 was held rigid so that DE represents solely changes in
van der Waals overlap. The smooth curves serve to guide the eye.
B) Representative close-packed hydroxy groups and their local environ-
ment in space-filling representation. The models contain sulfur atoms
(yellow) in place of the 2’-hydroxy groups.
30 3. These trends indicate that the interference profiles
reflect the volume–energy dependencies.
The multifunctional hydroxy group exerts its influence on
RNA structure and function in multiple ways, for example, by
mediating tertiary interactions through hydrogen bonding or
metal-ion coordination, or by serving as a scaffold for the
integral hydration network associated with RNA.[1] The 2’-
hydroxy group may also make indirect contributions to
structure and function as a consequence of its polar character
and capacity to fill space, or its ability to withdraw electrons
inductively or engender a ribonucleotide with a preference
for the 3’-endo sugar conformation.[18] These effects appa-
rently have no energetic significance for folding at residues
bearing dispensable 2’-hydroxy groups (that is, residues that
do not interfere upon 2’-deoxynucleotide substitution). Nev-
ertheless, the nucleotide analogues described herein can
“induce” DC209 P4-P6 folding interference when introduced
at these locations. The analogues may act at several levels,
which include, but are not necessarily limited to, 1) sugar
conformational preferences, 2) hydrophobicity, and 3) molec-
ular volume.
Received: December 18, 2003
Revised: March 15, 2004 [Z53575]
Keywords: hydrogen bonds · interfaces · nucleotides ·
.
RNA structures · RNA
[1] See, for example: a) S. A. Strobel, J. A. Doudna, Trends
Biochem. Sci. 1997, 22, 262 – 266; b) A. R. Ferre-D'Amare,
J. A. Doudna, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 1999, 28, 57 –
73; c) T. Hermann, D. J. Patel, J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 294, 829 – 849;
d) R. T. Batey, R. P. Rambo, J. A. Doudna, Angew. Chem. 1999,
111, 2472 – 2491; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2326 – 2343;
e) E. A. Doherty, J. A. Batey, B. Masquida, J. A. Doudna, Nat.
Struct. Biol. 2001, 8, 339 – 343; f) D. J. Battle, J. A. Doudna, Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 11676 – 11681.
[2] a) R. B. Waring, Nucleic Acids Res. 1989, 17, 10281 – 10293;
b) E. L. Christian, M. Yarus, J. Mol. Biol. 1992, 228, 743 – 758;
c) S. A. Strobel, K. Shetty, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94,
2903 – 2908; d) L. Ortoleva-Donnelly, A. A. Szewczak, R. R.
Gutell, S. A. Strobel, RNA 1998, 4, 498 – 519; e) S. P. Ryder, L.
Ortoleva-Donnelly, A. B. Kosek, S. A. Strobel, Methods Enzy-
mol. 2000, 317, 92 – 109, and references cited therein.
DC209 P4-P6 can be used as a model system to define the
influence of atomic modifications on folding.[6] In addition to
the analogues described herein, we have defined the influence
of 2’-fluoro-, 2’-amino-, and 2’-methoxynucleotides on folding
in the context of this RNA domain.[6,19] Only the 2’-
fluoronucleotide analogues induce interference in accordance
with their strong preference for the 3’-endo sugar conforma-
[3] a) F. L. Murphy, T. R. Cech, Biochemistry 1993, 32, 5291– 5300;
b) J. H. Cate, A. R. Gooding, E. Podell, K. Zhou, B. L. Golden,
3036
ꢀ 2004 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3033 –3037