Wang et al.
of hexane and ethyl acetate (30:1) afforded 0.19 g of the cross
cally give the isomerically pure (Z)-acrylic esters or
conjugated dienes. These results are summarized in
Table 2.
coupling product as an oil. 19F NMR (CDCl3) δ -134.8 (d, J )
1
127.8 Hz, 1 F), -162.8 (d, J ) 127.8 Hz, 1 F) ppm; H NMR
(CDCl3) δ 7.53 (d, J ) 8.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.14 (d, J ) 8.1 Hz, 2 H),
4.27 (qd, J ) 7.1, 0.6 Hz, 2 H), 1.27 (td, J ) 7.1, 0.9 Hz, 3 H)
ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 160.1 (dd, J ) 29.9, 6.1 Hz), 155.8
(dd, J ) 58.7, 19.1 Hz), 141.7 (d, J ) 2.4 Hz), 139.2 (dd, J )
243.0, 44.0 Hz), 129.3 (d, J ) 2.5 Hz), 126.9 (dd, J ) 9.8, 8.6
Hz), 125.4 (dd, J ) 23.2, 6.1 Hz), 61.5, 12.3, 14.0 ppm; GC-
MS m/z (relative intensity): 226 (M+, 87), 197 (26), 181 (28),
154 (100); HRMS calcd 226.0805 for C12H12F2O2, found 226.0813.
Ethyl (Z)-2,3-Difluoro-2-propenoate (15). (E)-1,2-Di-
fluoro-1-iodoethylene (16.20 g, 85 mmol), triethylamine (12.0
mL, 86 mmol), PdCl2(PPh3)2 (0.72 g, 1 mmol), and EtOH (30
mL) were added to a 120-mL Hastelloy Parr pressure reactor
with a stirring bar (caution: the reaction should be carried
out behind a safety shield in a well-ventilated hood).The
pressure reactor was pressurized to 160 psi of CO, and the
pressure was released. This process was repeated 4 times to
rid the system of air. Finally, the reactor was pressurized to
160 psi of CO and was stirred vigorously at room temperature.
After 5 h, when the reaction was completed, the pressure was
carefully released. The mixture was transferred to a separatory
funnel containing 100 mL of ether. The organic layer was
washed with water (20 mL), 10% aqueous HCl (10 mL),
saturated aqueous NaHCO3 (10 mL), and brine (10 mL). The
organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concen-
trated by rotary evaporation. The crude product was purified
by fractional distillation (7.28 g colorless oil, yield: 63%, bp:
88-90 °C/760 mm). 19F NMR (CDCl3) δ -145.2 (dd, J ) 70.5,
6.8 Hz, 1 F), -151.6 (dd, J ) 14.1, 6.8 Hz, 1 F) ppm; 1H NMR
(CDCl3) δ 7.34 (dd, J ) 70.6, 14.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.32 (q, J ) 7.1
Hz, 2 H), 1.34 (t, J ) 7.1 Hz, 3 H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ
160.2 (dd, J ) 28.6, 8.5 Hz), 144.0 (dd, J ) 274.5, 10.4 Hz),
139.5 (dd, J ) 255.5, 9.1 Hz), 61.9, 14.1 ppm; HRMS for
C5H6F2O2 calcd 136.0336, found 136.0333.
Aryl iodides substituted with either electron-donating
or electron-withdrawing groups reacted smoothly with 16
under the coupling conditions to give the (Z)-acrylic esters
in good to excellent yields. With 1-bromo-4-iodobenzene
(entry 7) only the iodide site coupled. The (E)- and (Z)-
vinyl bromides readily coupled to stereospecifically give
the conjugated dienes.
The configuration of both the (Z)- and (E)-2,3-difluoro-
3-stannylacrylic esters, as well as the configuration of
the aryl acrylic esters and dienes, was unambiguously
1
assigned on the basis of 19F and H coupling constants.
All products exhibited vicinal couplings (3JF,F ) 0-22 Hz)
consistent with the cis-CFdCF- configuration versus the
vicinal coupling (3JF,F ) 100-140 Hz) for the trans-CFd
CF- configuration.18 Vicinal coupling of 3JH,H ) 6-12 Hz
for cis and 3JH,H ) 12-18 Hz for trans was used to assign
the configuration of the -CHdCH- unit in the dienes.22
Conclusions
We have developed a useful methodology for the
preparation of both (Z)- and (E)-2,3-difluoro-3-stannyl-
acrylic esters. These new synthons readily undergo cross-
coupling reactions under Liebeskind conditions [(Pd-
(PPh3)4/CuI)] with aryl iodides and vinyl bromides, as
well as 2-iodothiophene, to stereospecifically provide the
corresponding 2,3-difluoro-3-arylacrylate esters and con-
jugated dienes from a common synthon precursor, thus
providing a new, efficient entry to this important class
of compounds.
Ethyl
(E)-2,3-Difluoro-3-(tri-n-butyl)stannyl-2-pro-
Experimental Section
penoate (16). To a two-necked round-bottomed flask with a
stirring bar was added ethyl (Z)-2,3-difluoropropenoate (0.68
g, 5 mmol) and 1.68 mL of Bu3SnCl (6.2 mmol) in a mixture of
5 mL of dry THF and 5 mL of dry ether. The solution was
cooled to -100 °C in a hexane/liquid nitrogen bath. A solution
of LDA (6.2 mmol) (prepared by reaction of iPr2NH and n-BuLi)
was added dropwise, carefully maintaining the internal tem-
perature at -90 to -100 °C throughout the addition. After
the addition was completed, the reaction mixture was stirred
at -100 °C for 1 h and slowly warmed to room temperature.
Water (2 mL) was added to quench any unreacted base. The
mixture was transferred to a 125-mL separatory funnel
containing 50 mL of ether. The organic layer was washed with
20 mL of water and 5 mL of brine, dried over anhydrous Na2-
SO4, and concentrated by rotary evaporation. The crude
stannane was purified by silica gel chromatography (hexane/
ethyl acetate ) 30:1) to yield 1.61 g of colorless oil. 19F NMR
(CDCl3) δ -116.6 (s, 1 F), -138.6 (s, 1 F) ppm; 1H NMR (CDCl3)
δ 4.29 (q, J ) 7.1 Hz, 2 H), 1.62-1.44 (m, 6 H), 1.37-1.27 (m,
6 H), 1.10 (t, J ) 8.1 Hz, 3 H), 0.90 (t, J ) 7.3 Hz, 9 H) ppm;
13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 171.3 (dd, J ) 333.5, 7.7 Hz), 162.5 (dd, J
) 29.0, 12.3 Hz), 145.7 (dd, J ) 279.2, 10.7 Hz), 61.6, 28.7,
27.1, 14.2, 13.6, 11.2 ppm; HRMS calcd for C17H31F2O2120Sn-
C4H9 369.0688, found 369.0680.
The preparation of (Z)-2,3-difluoro-3-(tri-n-butyl)stannyl-
acrylate 3 has been described in a previous report.19 Compound
14 was prepared according to the reported procedure.8d
General Procedure for the Stille-Liebeskind Cross-
Coupling Reactions of Ethyl (Z)- or (E)-2,3-Difluoro-3-
(tri-n-butyl)stannylpropenoate with Aromatic Iodides
and Vinyl Bromides. A round-bottomed flask was charged
with a stirring bar and nitrogen tee, CuI (0.05 g, 0.26 mmol),
Pd(PPh3)4 (0.03 g, 0.026 mmol), and 3 mL of dry DMF. Ethyl
(Z)- or (E)-2,3-difluoro-3-(tri-n-butyl)stannylpropenoate (0.21
g, 0.5 mmol) and 0.55 mmol of aromatic iodide or vinyl bromide
were added sequentially. After the reaction was completed (the
reaction progress was monitored by TLC), the reaction mixture
was diluted with ether (100 mL) and washed with aqueous
KF solution (15%, 50 mL). The organic layer was dried over
Na2SO4 and concentrated. The crude product was purified by
silica gel column chromatography. An alternative procedure
of workup is to use Co(OAc)2‚4H2O23 instead of aqueous KF
solution. Therefore, after the reaction was completed, Co-
(OAc)2‚4H2O (0.25 g, 1 mmol) was added to the reaction
mixture, and the mixture was stirred for 10 min at room
temperature. Then the mixture was poured directly onto silica
gel and purified by column chromatography.
Ethyl (E)-2,3-Difluoro-3-(4-methylphenyl)-2-propenoate
(4). The reaction mixture of (Z)-2,3-difluoro-3-(tri-n-butyl)-
stannylpropenoate (0.50 g, 1.17 mmol) with 4-iodotoluene (0.22
g, 1.01 mmol) in the presence of Pd(PPh3)4 (0.05 g, 0.043 mmol),
CuI (0.10 g, 0.52 mmol) in DMF (5 mL) was stirred at room
temperature for 10 h. Column chromatography with a mixture
Acknowledgment. We greatly acknowledge the
National Science Foundation for their financial support
of this work.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental pro-
cedure for the synthesis of 5-13 and 17-25 and their
1
characterization by H, 19F, 13C NMR, GC-MS, and HRMS.
1
Copies of H, 19F, and 13C NMR of compounds 4-13 and 15-
(22) Silverstein, R. M.; Bassler, G. C.; Morrill, T. C. Spectrometric
Identification of Organic Compounds, 5th ed.; Wiley & Sons: New
York, 1991; p 221.
(23) Blumenthal, E. J. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Iowa, Iowa City,
IA, 2000; pp 122-144.
25. This material is available free of charge via the Internet
JO0517949
10746 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 70, No. 26, 2005