Chemistry Letters Vol.33, No.10 (2004)
1379
Table 2. Thiolysis of 1,2-epoxides with aryl disulfides in the
presence of Zn/CeCl3. 7H2O-TBPB at 70 ꢁC
and reused in three runs without any loss of activity (Table 1,
Entries 1, 2).
In conclusion, a new, powerful, regioselective chemoselec-
tive and environmentally friendly method is described for thiol-
ysis of 1,2-epoxides with odorless aryl disulfides instead of the
thiols in good to high yields. In addition, short reaction times,
relatively mild reaction conditions and high yields with straight-
forward work-up, reusability, stability and non-toxicity of the
catalyst and ionic liquid make the present method efficient,
convenient and ‘green,’ which could be a very efficient alterna-
tive to the classic methodology.
Yield /%b/
Time /min
Entry R or Epoxide
Product a
HOCH2CHS
1
2
Ph
Ph
92/20(89)c
Ph
HOCH2CHS
Ph
CH3
90/20
HOCH2CHS
Ph
3
4
Ph
87/20
80/45
The authors thank to Razi University for financial
assistance.
S
O
O
O
References and Notes
OH
S
1
2
3
F. Viola, G. Balliano, P. Milla, L. Cattel, F. Rocco, and M.
Ceruti, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 8, 223 (2000).
M. E. Peach, ‘‘The Chemistry of the Thiol Group,’’ John
Wiley, New York (1974), Part 3, p 771.
a) D. Amantini, F. Fringuelli, F. Pizzo, S. Tortoioli, and L.
Vaccaro, Synlett, 2003, 2292. b) B. Movassagh, S. Sobhani,
F. Kheirdoush, and Z. Fadaei, Synth. Commun., 33, 3103
(2003). c) J. Downsland, F. Mckerlie, and D. J. Procter,
Tetrahedron Lett., 41, 4923 (2000).
CH3
5
6
80/55
78/50
OH
S
OH
4
F. Fringuelli, F. Pizzo, S. Tortoioli, and L. Vaccaro, J. Org.
Chem., 68, 8248 (2003).
7
8
9
PhOCH2
PhOCH2
90/30(87)c
89/35
PhOCH2CHCH2S-
OH
5
6
R. Fan and X.-L. Hou, J. Org. Chem., 68, 726 (2003).
S. Chanrasekar, C. R. Reddy, B. N. Babu, and G.
Chandrashekar, Tetrahedron Lett., 43, 3801 (2002).
a) F. Fringuelli, F. Pizzo, S. Tortoioli, and L. Vaccaro,
Adv. Synth. Catal., 344, 379 (2002). b) M. Romdhani Younes,
M. M. Chaabouni, and A. Baklouti, Tetrahedron Lett., 42,
3167 (2001).
a) J. S. Yadav, B. V. S. Reddy, A. K. Basak, and A. Venkat
Narsaiah, Tetrahedron Lett., 44, 1047 (2003).
a) R. Sheldon, Chem. Commun., 2001, 2399. b) P.
Wasserscheid and W. Keim, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 39,
3772 (2000).
PhOCH2CHCH2S-
OH
CH3
7
85/50
CH2CHCH2S
OH
O
O
8
9
O
10
11
80/55
85/30
CH2CHCH2S
OH
CH3
O
10 a) A. R. Khosropour, M. M. Khodaei, and K. Ghozati, Chem.
Lett., 34, 303 (2004). b) I. Mohammadpoor-Baltork and
A. R. Khosropour, Synth. Commun., 22, 3411 (2001).
CH3(CH2)4CH2
CH3(CH2)5 CH2CHCH2S
OH
11 M. M. Khodaei, A. R. Khosropour, and K. Ghozati,
Tetrahedron Lett., 45, 3525 (2004).
)
12
CH3(CH2 3OCH2
86/45
CH3(CH2)2CH2O CH2CHCH2S
OH
12 a) G. Bartoli, E. Marcantoni, and L. Sambri, Synlett, 2003,
2101. b) J. S. Yadav, B. V. S. Reddy, C. V. Rao, P. K. Chand,
and A. R. Prasad, Synlett, 2002, 137. c) J. S. Yadav, B. V. S.
Reddy, M. S. Reddy, and G. Sabitha, Synlett, 2001, 1134.
13 Typical procedure for preparation of trans-2-phenylthiocyclo-
hexanol (Table 2, Entry 4): To a molten mixture of (PhS)2
(1 mmol), CeCl3. 7H2O (0.2 mmol), and TBPB (0.5 mmol), cy-
clohexene oxide (1 mmol) and zinc powder (1 mmol) were
added. The reaction mixture was stirred at 70 ꢁC for 45 min
(monitored by TLC). After completion of the reaction, the mix-
ture was washed with Et2O (3 ꢂ 10 mL) and the organic layer
was evaporated. The residue was chromatographied on silica
gel (petroleum ether–EtOAc) to afford the pure product
Cl CH2CHCH2S
OH
82/60
13
ClCH2
aAll products were identified by comparison of their physical
and spectral data with those of authentic samples. bIsolated
yields. The yield achieved from the recycled promoter.
c
the case of strong Lewis acids with thiophenols.3–7
These results indicated that this reaction not only needs the
presence of the catalyst for proceeding, but also it is performed
only in the presence of the ionic liquids and among them TBPB
showed more effective in this transformation.
Another advantage of this method for this transformation is
recyclability of this promoter system. Since Zn–CeCl3.7H2O/
TBPB was weakly soluble in Et2O, this was separated by
washing with Et2O and dried at 80 ꢁC under reduced pressure
1
(80%). IR (KBr) ꢁmax 3620, 3200, 1580, 1435, 690. H NMR
(200 MHz, CDCl3): ꢂ 1.22–1.42 (m, 4H), 1.62–1.83 (m, 2H),
2.10–2.39 (m, 2H), 2.85 (ddd, 1H, J ¼ 11:6, 9.8, 4.5 Hz),
3.15 (br, 1H, OH), 3.42 (ddd, 1H, J ¼ 9:8, 9.8, 4.5 Hz),
7.25–7.42 (m, 5H). 13C NMR (50 MHz, CDCl3): ꢂ 24.7,
26.6, 33.1, 34.2, 56.9, 72.4, 128.2, 129.3, 133.0, 134.2. Anal.
Calcd. for C12H16OS (208.317): C, 69.19; H, 7.74; S,
15.39%. Found: C, 69.21; H, 7.76; S, 15.43%.
Published on the web (Advance View) September 25, 2004; DOI 10.1246/cl.2004.1378