Mendeleev Commun., 2020, 30, 112–113
reaction atmosphere and the formate structure (HCOOBui,
support by RUDN ‘5-100’program. NMR studies were supported
by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian
Federation and were carried out using the equipment of Center
for Molecular Composition Studies of A. N. Nesmeyanov
Institute of Organoelement Compounds, Russian Academy of
Sciences.
HCOOBn, HCOOMe). The detailed optimization data is
provided in the Online Supplementary Materials. As a result, the
combination of methyl formate in the presence of 10 equiv.
sodium acetate or sodium hydrogen carbonate and 1 mol% of
rhodium(iii) chloride as a catalyst at 160 °C under nitrogen
atmosphere was found to be optimal. With these conditions in
hands, we investigated the substrate scope (Scheme 1). Aromatic
amines with both electron donating and electron withdrawing
groups were benzylated in the yields around 70% (3a and 3c).
Electron withdrawing chlorine atom in aldehyde 2b led to
decrease in the yield of product 3b due to elevated reduction rate
of this aldehyde into 4-chlorobenzyl alcohol. Acetone 2c could
be used for the preparation of N-isopropylamine derivative 3d,
however, N-isopropyl-N-methyl derivative 3'd was also formed.
This fact reveals the possibility of N-methylation by methanol in
the presence of the metal catalyst. Starting from diamine 4, a
mixture of mono- and dialkylation products 5a,b was generated
(see Scheme 1). Although yields are moderate, the developed
procedure is tolerant to reducible functional groups such as
sulfone. For example, aromatic chlorides can be easily reduced
with molecular hydrogen,8,27 but the chlorine atom persists under
the developed conditions.
The suggested procedure was found to be suitable for
N-methylation of amines by formaldehyde (Scheme 2). Anilines
with electron donating groups (1a, 7a) and electron withdrawing
groups (1b, 7b) were dimethylated in good to quantitative yields.
When diphenylamine 9 was used as a substrate, along with
product 10, the comparable amount of compound 10' was
detected, whose formation can be rationalized considering the
phenol-formaldehyde type condensation. However, no conden-
sation of this type was observed for substituted anilines, which
may be accounted for the inductive effect of methoxy group.
In conclusion, the new procedure for the reductive amination
comprising alkyl formates as reducing agents has been developed.
It does not require corrosive or complex reagents. The limitations
of the method were examined and the optimal conditions were
found.
Online Supplementary Materials
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found
in the online version at doi: 10.1016/j.mencom.2020.01.037.
References
1 A. N. Vereshchagin, K. A. Karpenko, M. N. Elinson, E. O. Dorofeeva,
A. S. Goloveshkin and M. P. Egorov, Mendeleev Commun., 2018, 28,
384.
2 K. P. Trainov, R. F. Salikov, Yu. N. Luponosov, P. S. Savchenko,
A. L. Mannanov, S.A. Ponomarenko, D. N. Platonov andYu.V. Tomilov,
Mendeleev Commun., 2019, 29, 304.
3 V.V. Baranov,Ya.A. Barsegyan, N. G. Kolotyrkina andA. N. Kravchenko,
Mendeleev Commun., 2019, 29, 323.
4 K. N. Gusak, Zh. V. Ignatovich and E. V. Koroleva, Russ. Chem. Rev.,
2015, 84, 288.
5 A. F. Abdel-Magid, K. G. Carson, B. D. Harris, C. A. Maryanoff and
R. D. Shah, J. Org. Chem., 1996, 61, 3849.
6 T. C. Nugent and M. El-Shazly, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2010, 352, 753.
7 R. P. Tripathi, S. S. Verma, J. Pandey and V. K. Tiwari, Curr. Org.
Chem., 2008, 12, 1093.
8 E. Podyacheva, O. I. Afanasyev, A. A. Tsygankov, M. Makarova and
D. Chusov, Synthesis, 2019, 51, 2667.
9 D. Chusov and B. List, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 5199.
10 N. V. Shvydkiy, E. A. Trifonova, A. M. Shved, Y. V. Nelyubina,
D. Chusov, D. S. Perekalin and A. R. Kudinov, Organometallics, 2016,
35, 3025.
11 A. A. Tsygankov, M. Makarova and D. Chusov, Mendeleev Commun.,
2018, 28, 113.
12 J. W. Park and Y. K. Chung, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 4846.
13 O. I. Afanasyev, A. A. Tsygankov, D. L. Usanov, D. S. Perekalin,
N. V. Shvydkiy, V. I. Maleev, A. R. Kudinov and D. Chusov, ACS Catal.,
2016, 6, 2043.
14 D. Formenti, F. Ferretti and F. Ragaini, ChemCatChem, 2018, 10, 148.
15 S. N. Gockel and K. L. Hull, Org. Lett., 2015, 17, 3236.
16 P. Hermange, A. T. Lindhardt, R. H. Taaning, K. Bjerglund, D. Lupp and
T. Skrydstrup, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 6061.
17 N. Jana, F. Zhou and T. G. Driver, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 6738.
18 O. I. Afanasyev, D. L. Usanov and D. Chusov, Org. Biomol. Chem.,
2017, 15, 10164.
This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic
Research (grant no. 18-33-00037). O.C. acknowledges the
19 O. I. Afanasyev, A. Zarochintsev, T. Petrushina, A. Cherkasova, G. Denisov,
I. Cherkashchenko, O. Chusova, O. Jinho, C. Man-Seog, D. L. Usanov,
S. E. Semenov and D. Chusov, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2019, 32.
20 H. Li, H. Neumann, M. Beller and X.-F. Wu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2014, 53, 3183.
R
i
R
NH2
CH2O
+
N
Me
Me
1a,b
6a,b
21 Y. Katafuchi, T. Fujihara, T. Iwai, J. Terao and Y. Tsuji, Adv. Synth.
a R = 4-MeOC6H4 (73%)
b R = 4-EtO2CC6H4 (85%)
Catal., 2011, 353, 475.
22 S. P. Chavan and B. M. Bhanage, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2015, 2405.
23 W. Chang, J. Li, W. Ren and Y. Shi, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2016, 14,
3047.
24 H. Konishi, H. Nagase and K. Manabe, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51,
1854.
Me
N
Me
N
i
Z
NH2
+
CH O
2
Me
Me
25 T. Ueda, H. Konishi and K. Manabe, Org. Lett., 2012, 14, 3100.
26 T. Fujihara, T. Hosoki, Y. Katafuchi, T. Iwai, J. Terao and Y. Tsuji,
Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 8012.
27 S. K. Aavula, A. Chikkulapalli, N. Hanumanthappa, I. Jyothi,
C. H. V. Kumar and S. G. Manjunatha, Tetrahedron Lett., 2013, 54,
5690.
2
Z
7a,b
8a,b
a Z = O (76%)
b Z = SO2 (99%)
Me
Me
N
N
H
i
N
CH2O
+
+
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
9
10 (32%)
10' (30%)
Scheme 2 Reagents and conditions: i, RhCl3 (1 mol%), CH2O
(12–20 equiv.), HCO2Me (10 equiv.), NaOAc (15 equiv.), MeOH (or EtOH
for 1b), H2O, 160 °C, 24 h.
Received: 2nd August 2019; Com. 19/6005
– 113 –