Halogenation in Ionic Liquids
certed, although not necessarily simultaneous. Almost
pentacoordinated carbon atoms characterize the charge-
diffuse rate-determining transition state.
ing.11 In a reaction of the type of Br3- addition, in which
both bond making and bond breaking occur in the
transition state, the effect of the viscosity depends on the
position of the transition state. At variance with the
situation characterizing the addition in all the other ILs,
in [bmim][Br] the reaction occurs in the presence of a
large excess of Br-. This anion is probably the true
nucleophile of the addition process, and its presence in a
large excess may affect the position of the transition
state; bond making may prevail over bond breaking.
Viscosity can in this case enhance the reaction rate. At
variance, in all the other ILs a later transition state is
more probable and the effect of the viscosity decreases,
becoming the opposite if the bond breaking is more
advanced with respect to the bond making.
This mechanism is completely different from that
characterizing the addition of Br2 to alkenes and alkynes
in chlorinated solvents, which occurs through the for-
mation of an ionic intermediate, a bromiranium (or
bromirenium), or â-bromocarbenium tribromide ion pair.5,7
Although Br2 is a much better electrophile than Br3-, due
to the high formation constant of the tribromide ion in
chlorinated solvents,5,7 the addition of free Br2 is not able
to compete with the addition of Br3-. Also in ILs the
-
charge-diffuse Br3 anion is much more stable than the
Br- species;8 practically no free bromine is present in
-
solution,2c and Br3 is the sole electrophile both in DCE
and ILs.2c In DCE, an aprotic solvent of medium polarity,
the electrophile (Br3-) and the nucleophilic species (the
The values of the kinetic constants and activation
parameters, which are really apparent activation param-
-
formed Br- anion or the same Br3 anion) are surely
-
eters being kBr the product of two constants (KC and k2),
3
present in solution as ion pairs with the tetrabutyl-
ammonium cation. Since the activation parameters in ILs
are very similar to the parameters characterizing the
reaction of [Bu4N][Br3] in DCE, much like in the ionic
media the anions are coordinated by one or more cations
of the ionic liquid, forming species very similar to ion
pairs. The presence of ion pairs in ILs has been proposed9
also by Welton and co-worker on the basis of the kinetic
behavior of nucleophilic substitution reactions in some
ILs and dichloromethane.
Although we propose the same mechanism in the two
media (ionic and molecular), it is evident from the data
reported in Table 1 that the reactions in ILs are generally
faster that in DCE, showing that ILs are able to affect
the stability of reactants and/or transition state, probably
the latter being more important.
cannot give direct information about the properties of ILs.
Anyway, the comparison with the values related to the
reaction in molecular solvents may be useful for increas-
ing the knowledge of these new reaction media.
In chlorinated solvents, the reaction rate increases on
going from more polar DCE to less polar chlorinated
solvents, in agreement with the formation of a transition
state having more charge delocalization than the reac-
tants. Furthermore, reaction rate is positively affected
by the ability of the solvent (for example, chloroform) to
give hydrogen bonding.5 In particular, it was suggested5
that the electrophilic solvatation by hydrogen bonding
to the leaving bromide ion is the main factor affecting
reactivity when the reaction is carried out in chloroform.
Using solvatochromic dyes and partition methods, Welton
et al. have shown that the examined ILs have a different
hydrogen bonding acidity; [bmim][Tf2N] should be among
the employed ILs, having the higher hydrogen bonding
ability.12 Actually, the data reported in Table 2 show that
the activation parameters are very similar in all inves-
tigated ILs. Therefore, they seem to be not significantly
affected by the different ability of the investigated ILs
to give hydrogen bonding, although generally the activa-
tion enthalpies are lower in ILs than in DCE. The
apparent lower ability of the ionic liquids, with respect
chloroform, to affect reactivity through hydrogen bonding
can be a consequence of the fact that this effect is due to
the IL cation. Cation exerts the hydrogen bonding donor
ability both on the leaving and on the entering Br- anion.
If bond making and bond breaking occur simultaneously
in the rate-determining step, the hydrogen bonding
ability of the IL has practically no effect. At variance, in
chloroform the nucleophilic Br- is present in solution as
a tight ion pair with the counteranion, the tetraalkyl-
ammonium cation, and therefore the formation of hydro-
gen bonding between the entering Br- and the solvent
is not important. The solvent can instead hydrogen bond
with the liberated leaving group (the Br- anion), favoring
the Br-Br bond breaking. Therefore, although we hy-
pothesize the same mechanism in molecular and ionic
In a previous study on bromination of alkynes (includ-
ing 3a and 3b) in [bmim][Br], a very viscous IL, we have
proposed2b the hypothesis that the viscosity of the reac-
-
tion medium might affect the rate of Br3 addition.
Particularly, viscosity seemed2b to increase the kinetic
-
constant when, as in the case of alkyne 3a (kBr ) 1.25
3
× 10-3 M-1s-1), the substrate structure favored an earlier
transition state, in which bond making is favored with
respect to bond breaking. Since the viscosity of the ionic
liquids used in this work has been recently determined,10
we first checked if, also under the new conditions, the
viscosity played a main role in the bromination of 3a . At
25 °C, the order of increasing viscosity is [emim][Tf2N]
< [bmim][Tf2N] = [bpy][Tf2N] < [hmim][Tf2N] < [bm2im]-
[Tf2N] < [bmim][PF6] , [bmim][Br]. The data reported
in Table 1 for alkyne 3a clearly show that the reaction
rates do not depend on the viscosity of the ionic liquid
alone. A trend may be found only considering a more
homogeneous class of ILs, [emim][Tf2N] < [bmim][Tf2N]
< [hmim][Tf2N], although in this case the reaction rates
increase as the solvent viscosities decrease. Actually, the
viscosity can have opposite effects on the reaction rate;
indeed it favors bond making but disfavors bond break-
(8) Grodkowski, J .; Neta, P. J . Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 11130-
11134.
(9) Lancaster, N. L.; Salter, P. A.; Welton, T.; Young, G. B. J . Org.
Chem. 2002, 67, 8855-8861.
(10) (a) Dzyuba, S.; Bartsch, R. A. ChemPhysChem 2002, 3, 161-
166. (b) Carda-Broch, S.; Berthold, A.; Armstrong, D. W. Anal. Bioanal.
Chem. 2003, 375, 191-199. (c) Okoturo, O. O.; VanderNoot, T. J . J .
Electroanal. Chem. 2004, 568, 167-181.
(11) Swiss, K. A.; Firestone, R. A. J . Org. Chem. 1999, 103, 5369-
5372.
(12) (a) Crowhurst, L.; Mawdsley, P. R.; Perez-Arlandis, J . M.;
Salter, P. A.; Welton, T. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003, 5, 2790-2794.
(b) Anderson, J . L.; Ding, J .; Welton, T.; Armstrong, D. W. J . Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 14247-14254.
J . Org. Chem, Vol. 69, No. 18, 2004 6061