A. Khalafi-Nezhad et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 44 (2003) 7325–7328
7327
were obtained in good yields but the presence of a
References
hydroxyl group on the aromatic ring (entry g) lowered
the yield. The aromatic carboxylic acids undergo reac-
tion relative slowly than aliphatic ones. In the case of
aromatic carboxylic acids, the presence of electron-
withdrawing groups on the aromatic ring accelerated
the reaction rate and increasing the reaction yields
1. (a) March, J. Advanced Organic Chemistry; John Wiley &
Sons: New York, 1992; pp. 416–425; (b) Comprehensive
Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M., Ed.; Pergamon Press:
Oxford, 1991; Vol. 6, pp. 381–417.
. Brown, W. Idrugs 1999, 2, 1059–1068.
. Sheehan, J. C.; Hess, G. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77,
067–1068.
. Wilson, J. D.; Hobbs, C. F; Wengaten, H. J. Org. Chem.
970, 15, 1542–1545.
. Yasuhara, T.; Nagaka, Y.; Tomioka, K. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 2000, 2901–2901.
2
3
(
entries i and n).
1
4
5
6
To explore the formation of acid anhydrides during
reaction progress a mixture of benzoic acid, imidazole
and urea was exposed to microwave irradiation. TLC
monitoring of this reaction mixture after each 30 s for
1
. Burnell-Curty, C.; Roskamp, E. J. Tetrahedron Lett.
993, 34, 5193–5196.
. Froyen, P. Synth. Commun. 1995, 25, 959–968.
6
min showed us that benzoic anhydride was not
1
formed in this conditions. Similarly an experiment with
a mixture of benzoic acid and imidazole also confirmed
the above result.
7
8
. Jang, D. O.; Park, D. J.; Kim, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999,
4
0, 5323–5326.
. Ishihara, K.; Ohara, S.; Yamamoto, H. J. Org. Chem.
996, 61, 4196–4199.
0. Thorsen, J. D.; Andersen, T. P.; Pedersen, U.; Yde, B.;
Leweson, S. Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 5633–5636.
1. Basel, Y.; Hassner, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 2529–
533.
2. Sanchez, R.; Vest, G.; Depres, L. Synth. Commun. 1989,
9, 2909–2913.
9
In addition, the effect of different ammonia sources on
the reaction progress was studied by using several
ammonium salts such as ammonium acetate, ammo-
nium chloride, ammonium sulfate, and ammonium car-
bonate. The results obtained showed that urea is the
most suitable source for in situ generation of ammonia.
1
1
1
1
2
1
17,29
As previously reported
we suggest that this reaction
13. Bailen, M. A.; Chinchilla, R.; Dodsworth, D. J.; Najera,
might be proceeding firstly by formation of an imida-
zolium carboxylate salt. This salt increases the absorp-
tion of the microwave energy and this energy
absorption increment causes the pyrolysis of urea and
liberation of ammonia. In the second step the imidazole
is exchanged by ammonia to form the ammonium
carboxylate salt, and finally strong heating of the
ammonium carboxylate salt gives the corresponding
carboxamide.
C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 9809–9813.
14. Varma, R. S. Green Chem. 1999, 43–55.
15. Loupy, A.; Petit, A.; Hamelin, J.; Texier-Boullet, F.;
Francoise, P.; Mathe, D. Synthesis 1998, 1213–1234.
16. Lidstron, P.; Tierney, J.; Wathey, B.; Westman, J. Tetra-
hedron 2001, 57, 9225–9283.
17. Baldwin, B. W.; Hirose, T.; Wang, Z. H. Chem. Commun.
1
996, 2669–2670.
8. Varma, R. S.; Naicker, K. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40,
177–6180.
9. Perreux, L.; Loupy, A.; Volatron, F. Tetrahedron 2002,
8, 2155–2162.
1
1
2
2
2
6
In summary, the present microwave-assisted procedure
provides an efficient and very simple methodology for
the preparation of primary amides using urea as a very
cheap and safe ammonia source with good yields under
solvent free conditions.
5
0. Sharifi, A.; Mohsenzadeh, M.; Mojtahedi, M.; Saidi, M.
R.; Balalaie, S. Synth. Commun. 2001, 31, 431–434.
1. Khadikar, B. M.; Madyar, V. R. Synth. Commun. 2002,
3
2, 1731–1734.
2. (a) Khalafi-Nezhad, A.; Hashemi, A. J. Chem. Res. (S)
999, 12, 720–721; (b) Khalafi-Nezhad, A.; Fareghi
Alamdari, R.; Zekri, N. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 7503–7506;
c) Khalafi-Nezhad, A.; Hashemi, A. J. Chem. Chem.
1
General procedure
(
Eng. 2001, 20, 9–12; (d) Khalafi-Nezhad, A.; Soltani Rad,
M. N.; Hakimelahi, G. H. Helv. Chem. Acta 2003, 86,
Our procedure entails the grinding of the mixture of
carboxylic acid (1 mmol), urea (2 mmol), imidazole (1
mmol). The mixture was exposed to microwave irradia-
tion in domestic MW oven for appropriate time and
power of MW oven (300 W). The resulting crude
product extracted was purified by column chromatogra-
phy using silica gel and EtOAc/n-hexane as eluent.
2
396–2403.
3. Kingston, B. H. M.; Carey, J. J.; Hellwig, B. Anal. Chem.
969, 41, 86–89.
4. Loupy, A.; Pigeon, P.; Ramdani, M. Tetrahedron 1996,
2, 6705–6712.
2
2
2
2
2
1
5
5. Garrigues, B.; Laporte, C.; Laurent, R.; Laporterie, A.;
Dubac, J. Liebigs Ann. 1996, 739–742.
6. CRC, Handbook of Tables for Organic Compound Iden-
th
th
Acknowledgements
tification, 54 and 80 .
7. Chen, S. T.; Wu, S. H.; Wang, K. T. Synthesis 1989,
3
7–38.
1
We thank Shiraz University research council for the
financial support for this work. We also thank Mr
Sajedian Fard for running the NMR spectra.
28. Selected H NMR data (DMSO-d , 250 MHz) for prod-
6
ucts c, d, k, o. c: l 3.72 (s, 2H, CH ), 6.30 (s, 2H, NH ),
7.13–7.27 (m, 5H, Ar). d: l 1.61 (s, 9H, 3CH ), 3.83 (s,
2
2
3